Re: Model 70 super grade maple or walnut featherweight
[Re: Bruce T]
#7468482
01/21/22 07:42 PM
01/21/22 07:42 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,671 MN
160user
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,671
MN
|
Calling the Maple a "Super Grade" should be criminal! Just tell it like it is, people won't pay for Super Grade quality walnut anymore. I love my model 70 SG's but they are a tad heavy.
I have nothing clever to put here.
|
|
|
Re: Model 70 super grade maple or walnut featherweight
[Re: Bruce T]
#7468493
01/21/22 07:46 PM
01/21/22 07:46 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 24,828 New Hampshire
Nessmuck
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 24,828
New Hampshire
|
I would spend my money on a nice pre-64 Model 70
It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
|
|
|
Re: Model 70 super grade maple or walnut featherweight
[Re: 160user]
#7468496
01/21/22 07:47 PM
01/21/22 07:47 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,933 Northern Maine
Bruce T
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,933
Northern Maine
|
Calling the Maple a "Super Grade" should be criminal! Just tell it like it is, people won't pay for Super Grade quality walnut anymore. I love my model 70 SG's but they are a tad heavy. All I know is they are calling it super grade AAA maple and it sure is pretty.
Nevada bound
|
|
|
Re: Model 70 super grade maple or walnut featherweight
[Re: Nessmuck]
#7468514
01/21/22 07:58 PM
01/21/22 07:58 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 270 PA
Snyde901
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 270
PA
|
I like the walnut best but end of day your money up to you There is only one right answer: Buy both!!!
BTW, I don't think the lower pic is of a featherweight. Doesn't have the Schnabel forend. Agree those are both super grades I would spend my money on a nice pre-64 Model 70 This, I'm a huge winchester fan and have several but none of the newer ones since they left Connecticut
|
|
|
Re: Model 70 super grade maple or walnut featherweight
[Re: Nessmuck]
#7468515
01/21/22 07:59 PM
01/21/22 07:59 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,933 Northern Maine
Bruce T
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,933
Northern Maine
|
I would spend my money on a nice pre-64 Model 70 Of course they are trying to sell guns but.... [Quote]For me to say that the current production Model 70 is a better rifle than the original pre-64 will likely be regarded as sacrilege by some. But the current model blends the best features of the original pre-64, with the anti-bind feature of the later post-64, and puts them together in a rifle that is arguably better made, better finished, and with quality control second to none.[Quote]
Nevada bound
|
|
|
Re: Model 70 super grade maple or walnut featherweight
[Re: Snyde901]
#7468519
01/21/22 08:00 PM
01/21/22 08:00 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,933 Northern Maine
Bruce T
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,933
Northern Maine
|
I like the walnut best but end of day your money up to you There is only one right answer: Buy both!!!
BTW, I don't think the lower pic is of a featherweight. Doesn't have the Schnabel forend. Agree those are both super grades I would spend my money on a nice pre-64 Model 70 This, I'm a huge winchester fan and have several but none of the newer ones since they left Connecticut Plus you can't get a pre 64 in 6.8 western
Nevada bound
|
|
|
Re: Model 70 super grade maple or walnut featherweight
[Re: headache73]
#7468529
01/21/22 08:06 PM
01/21/22 08:06 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 24,828 New Hampshire
Nessmuck
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 24,828
New Hampshire
|
I'm a sucker for a featherweight. To me that maple looks cheap.... I agree on that. Curley Maple should look like this…
It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
|
|
|
Re: Model 70 super grade maple or walnut featherweight
[Re: Bruce T]
#7468534
01/21/22 08:11 PM
01/21/22 08:11 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 46,929 james bay frontierOnt.
Boco
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 46,929
james bay frontierOnt.
|
Personally, I like the look of the walnut much better. The checkering stands out better on the maple though but that may just be in the photo.
Last edited by Boco; 01/21/22 08:13 PM.
Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
|
|
|
Re: Model 70 super grade maple or walnut featherweight
[Re: Bruce T]
#7468549
01/21/22 08:24 PM
01/21/22 08:24 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 24,828 New Hampshire
Nessmuck
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 24,828
New Hampshire
|
Blonde guns don’t do it for me,…..but then again ,Iam not the one buying it
It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
|
|
|
Re: Model 70 super grade maple or walnut featherweight
[Re: Bruce T]
#7468556
01/21/22 08:31 PM
01/21/22 08:31 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,671 MN
160user
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,671
MN
|
Calling the Maple a "Super Grade" should be criminal! Just tell it like it is, people won't pay for Super Grade quality walnut anymore. I love my model 70 SG's but they are a tad heavy. All I know is they are calling it super grade AAA maple and it sure is pretty. Yes, I know that they are calling it a SG but they are NOTHING like the old ones. How much are they? Around $1500?
I have nothing clever to put here.
|
|
|
|
|