Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting
[Re: MattLA]
#7500814
02/18/22 05:41 PM
02/18/22 05:41 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 182 Georgia
Wiz
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 182
Georgia
|
https://www.regulations.gov/document/FWS-HQ-NWRS-2021-0027-0467I don't mean to be this way, and I am prepared for all the hate comments, but we shouldn't just read what somebody says and assume the worst. The way that the GOV works is that unless it's an emergency, ALL CHANGES must follow a certain path before they can get enacted. There is no "private settling going on" with non profits, for profits or any other non-gov entity, for MeatEater to publish that is beyond disappointing and just fear mongering. It's also important to not blanket copy messages and just put your name in it and hope that it does something, personalized different messages are the way to go about this. It also looks like this is not something new at all, and has been one of the disputed things since the proposed rule took comments and went into effect. The argument that the group is using presents a few issues for everybody, number 1 they are using the only angle (lead ammo) they have to try and get hunting overturned. Number 2, they bring up a perfectly valid point in that if you cant use lead shotgun ammo, why can you use lead rifle ammo. The worst thing that is going to come out of this is that you cannot use lead ammunition so close to water, or a full out ban on lead ammo. The FWS already received, noted and said that it understood the positions of worrying about lead ammunition, so they are pretty much good to go. I wish I shared your optimism on this but damages that are included in this lawsuit are listed beginning on page 5 of the referenced filing (see below) suggest that this is far less about lead ammo: Case No. CV-21-144-DWMA few of the “damages” of the Plaintiff’s member include but are not limited to the following: risk to Grizzly Bears from legally hunting Black Bear that reduces the member’s ability to see the bears or their tracks and scat during future visits to the Swan River NWR in Montana Reducing member’s ability to see Jaguars on the Leslie Canyon NWR in Arizona Harming the spiritual, personal, and aesthetic interests of a member because hunting reduces her ability to view Ocelots and Jaguarundi at the Laguna Atascosa NWR These animals may be involved in vehicle collisions with hunter’s vehicles Reducing a member’s ability to photograph Audubon’s Crested Caracara and Wood Stork in the Everglades and St. Marks NWR in Florida because of noise associated with hunting. This is one of several recent lawsuits that have been filed in the Missoula District Court. Another from this past fall resulted in the judge ruling that the Canada Lynx distinct population in the lower 48 states should stay listed under the ESA even though the best available science included in its Species Status Assessment prepared by the FWS and species experts from around the country found that the Lynx no longer met the definition of a threatened species and has exceeded historical abundance throughout much of its range in the lower 48 states. Why, because if the Lynx stay listed, this gives the CBD and AR groups ammo in the form of the ESA to make a legal argument against delisting the wolf and curtailing any control of their populations which also greatly exceed their recovery goals in much of their range. Make no mistake, this isn't just about lead ammo and this won't be the last of these lawsuits.
|
|
|
Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting
[Re: coondagger2]
#7500879
02/18/22 06:20 PM
02/18/22 06:20 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,994 Central, SD
Law Dog
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,994
Central, SD
|
This is where the “I’ll waste my vote for a guy who can never win” comes back to bite us all in the rear.
Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!
Jerry Herbst
|
|
|
Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting
[Re: MattLA]
#7500908
02/18/22 06:51 PM
02/18/22 06:51 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,473 Over there.
Flicker Shad
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,473
Over there.
|
https://www.regulations.gov/document/FWS-HQ-NWRS-2021-0027-0467I don't mean to be this way, and I am prepared for all the hate comments, but we shouldn't just read what somebody says and assume the worst. The way that the GOV works is that unless it's an emergency, ALL CHANGES must follow a certain path before they can get enacted. There is no "private settling going on" with non profits, for profits or any other non-gov entity, for MeatEater to publish that is beyond disappointing and just fear mongering. It's also important to not blanket copy messages and just put your name in it and hope that it does something, personalized different messages are the way to go about this. It also looks like this is not something new at all, and has been one of the disputed things since the proposed rule took comments and went into effect. The argument that the group is using presents a few issues for everybody, number 1 they are using the only angle (lead ammo) they have to try and get hunting overturned. Number 2, they bring up a perfectly valid point in that if you cant use lead shotgun ammo, why can you use lead rifle ammo. The worst thing that is going to come out of this is that you cannot use lead ammunition so close to water, or a full out ban on lead ammo. The FWS already received, noted and said that it understood the positions of worrying about lead ammunition, so they are pretty much good to go. The way the government works is by legal bribery from lobbyists. How you're thinking is long gone and the ways of the past.
|
|
|
Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting
[Re: Flicker Shad]
#7500973
02/18/22 07:59 PM
02/18/22 07:59 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 679 michigan
coyote 1
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 679
michigan
|
https://www.regulations.gov/document/FWS-HQ-NWRS-2021-0027-0467I don't mean to be this way, and I am prepared for all the hate comments, but we shouldn't just read what somebody says and assume the worst. The way that the GOV works is that unless it's an emergency, ALL CHANGES must follow a certain path before they can get enacted. There is no "private settling going on" with non profits, for profits or any other non-gov entity, for MeatEater to publish that is beyond disappointing and just fear mongering. It's also important to not blanket copy messages and just put your name in it and hope that it does something, personalized different messages are the way to go about this. It also looks like this is not something new at all, and has been one of the disputed things since the proposed rule took comments and went into effect. The argument that the group is using presents a few issues for everybody, number 1 they are using the only angle (lead ammo) they have to try and get hunting overturned. Number 2, they bring up a perfectly valid point in that if you cant use lead shotgun ammo, why can you use lead rifle ammo. The worst thing that is going to come out of this is that you cannot use lead ammunition so close to water, or a full out ban on lead ammo. The FWS already received, noted and said that it understood the positions of worrying about lead ammunition, so they are pretty much good to go. The way the government works is by legal bribery from lobbyists. How you're thinking is long gone and the ways of the past. X2. One judge just listed Midwest wolves again. The system is broken.
United we stand,divided we fall.
|
|
|
Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting
[Re: Flicker Shad]
#7501029
02/18/22 08:46 PM
02/18/22 08:46 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 986 Louisiana
MattLA
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 986
Louisiana
|
The way the government works is by legal bribery from lobbyists. How you're thinking is long gone and the ways of the past. [/quote] I understand what you are saying, but this part of the gov still works that way. It's still done by notice of intent, proposed rule, modifications to proposed rule, finalized rule, etc and so forth. Sure, sometimes the gov no matter what the comments say, are going to do what they are going to do, but the FWS historically is not that way at all. Public comments on things like this play a HUGE role in how the government decides how to do things. @Wiz, I know man I understand they don't really care about lead ammo and want to just ban hunting, but they will use lead ammo as that means trust me. Depending on how the FWS argues, most of those points will be invalid due to other circumstances, it's just annoying because this is an example of what happens when you lose playing by the rules so you just resort to something that ends up making everybody worse off(lawsuits).
|
|
|
Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting
[Re: Gary Benson]
#7501103
02/18/22 09:49 PM
02/18/22 09:49 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,217 Armpit, ak
Dirt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,217
Armpit, ak
|
"The Biden Administration’s expansion of hunting and fishing on 90 refuges covering 2.1 million acres in August 2021 is not being contested." You are welcome!
Who is John Galt?
|
|
|
|
|