No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting [Re: coondagger2] #7500773
02/18/22 05:09 PM
02/18/22 05:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 10,216
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
"Callie's little brother"
Yes sir  Offline
"Callie's little brother"
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 10,216
Marion Kansas
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
I Believe the President can and has stopped hunting on public land. President Obama to a tune of 550 million acres I believe. Wish I could post links they are pretty easy to find.

Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting [Re: MattLA] #7500814
02/18/22 05:41 PM
02/18/22 05:41 PM
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 182
Georgia
W
Wiz Offline
trapper
Wiz  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 182
Georgia
Originally Posted by Tofan
https://www.regulations.gov/document/FWS-HQ-NWRS-2021-0027-0467

I don't mean to be this way, and I am prepared for all the hate comments, but we shouldn't just read what somebody says and assume the worst. The way that the GOV works is that unless it's an emergency, ALL CHANGES must follow a certain path before they can get enacted. There is no "private settling going on" with non profits, for profits or any other non-gov entity, for MeatEater to publish that is beyond disappointing and just fear mongering. It's also important to not blanket copy messages and just put your name in it and hope that it does something, personalized different messages are the way to go about this. It also looks like this is not something new at all, and has been one of the disputed things since the proposed rule took comments and went into effect.

The argument that the group is using presents a few issues for everybody, number 1 they are using the only angle (lead ammo) they have to try and get hunting overturned. Number 2, they bring up a perfectly valid point in that if you cant use lead shotgun ammo, why can you use lead rifle ammo. The worst thing that is going to come out of this is that you cannot use lead ammunition so close to water, or a full out ban on lead ammo. The FWS already received, noted and said that it understood the positions of worrying about lead ammunition, so they are pretty much good to go.


I wish I shared your optimism on this but damages that are included in this lawsuit are listed beginning on page 5 of the referenced filing (see below) suggest that this is far less about lead ammo:


Case No. CV-21-144-DWM

A few of the “damages” of the Plaintiff’s member include but are not limited to the following: risk to Grizzly Bears from legally hunting Black Bear that reduces the member’s ability to see the bears or their tracks and scat during future visits to the Swan River NWR in Montana

Reducing member’s ability to see Jaguars on the Leslie Canyon NWR in Arizona

Harming the spiritual, personal, and aesthetic interests of a member because hunting reduces her ability to view Ocelots and Jaguarundi at the Laguna Atascosa NWR

These animals may be involved in vehicle collisions with hunter’s vehicles

Reducing a member’s ability to photograph Audubon’s Crested Caracara and Wood Stork in the Everglades and St. Marks NWR in Florida because of noise associated with hunting.



This is one of several recent lawsuits that have been filed in the Missoula District Court. Another from this past fall resulted in the judge ruling that the Canada Lynx distinct population in the lower 48 states should stay listed under the ESA even though the best available science included in its Species Status Assessment prepared by the FWS and species experts from around the country found that the Lynx no longer met the definition of a threatened species and has exceeded historical abundance throughout much of its range in the lower 48 states.

Why, because if the Lynx stay listed, this gives the CBD and AR groups ammo in the form of the ESA to make a legal argument against delisting the wolf and curtailing any control of their populations which also greatly exceed their recovery goals in much of their range.

Make no mistake, this isn't just about lead ammo and this won't be the last of these lawsuits.

Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting [Re: coondagger2] #7500870
02/18/22 06:15 PM
02/18/22 06:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21,716
Sandhills Nebraska
G
Gary Benson Offline
trapper
Gary Benson  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21,716
Sandhills Nebraska
[Linked Image]


Life ain't supposed to be easy.
Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting [Re: coondagger2] #7500879
02/18/22 06:20 PM
02/18/22 06:20 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,994
Central, SD
Law Dog Offline
trapper
Law Dog  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,994
Central, SD
This is where the “I’ll waste my vote for a guy who can never win” comes back to bite us all in the rear.


Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!

Jerry Herbst
Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting [Re: MattLA] #7500908
02/18/22 06:51 PM
02/18/22 06:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,473
Over there.
F
Flicker Shad Offline
trapper
Flicker Shad  Offline
trapper
F

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,473
Over there.
Originally Posted by Tofan
https://www.regulations.gov/document/FWS-HQ-NWRS-2021-0027-0467

I don't mean to be this way, and I am prepared for all the hate comments, but we shouldn't just read what somebody says and assume the worst. The way that the GOV works is that unless it's an emergency, ALL CHANGES must follow a certain path before they can get enacted. There is no "private settling going on" with non profits, for profits or any other non-gov entity, for MeatEater to publish that is beyond disappointing and just fear mongering. It's also important to not blanket copy messages and just put your name in it and hope that it does something, personalized different messages are the way to go about this. It also looks like this is not something new at all, and has been one of the disputed things since the proposed rule took comments and went into effect.

The argument that the group is using presents a few issues for everybody, number 1 they are using the only angle (lead ammo) they have to try and get hunting overturned. Number 2, they bring up a perfectly valid point in that if you cant use lead shotgun ammo, why can you use lead rifle ammo. The worst thing that is going to come out of this is that you cannot use lead ammunition so close to water, or a full out ban on lead ammo. The FWS already received, noted and said that it understood the positions of worrying about lead ammunition, so they are pretty much good to go.

The way the government works is by legal bribery from lobbyists. How you're thinking is long gone and the ways of the past.

Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting [Re: Flicker Shad] #7500973
02/18/22 07:59 PM
02/18/22 07:59 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 679
michigan
C
coyote 1 Offline
trapper
coyote 1  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 679
michigan
Originally Posted by Flicker Shad
Originally Posted by Tofan
https://www.regulations.gov/document/FWS-HQ-NWRS-2021-0027-0467

I don't mean to be this way, and I am prepared for all the hate comments, but we shouldn't just read what somebody says and assume the worst. The way that the GOV works is that unless it's an emergency, ALL CHANGES must follow a certain path before they can get enacted. There is no "private settling going on" with non profits, for profits or any other non-gov entity, for MeatEater to publish that is beyond disappointing and just fear mongering. It's also important to not blanket copy messages and just put your name in it and hope that it does something, personalized different messages are the way to go about this. It also looks like this is not something new at all, and has been one of the disputed things since the proposed rule took comments and went into effect.

The argument that the group is using presents a few issues for everybody, number 1 they are using the only angle (lead ammo) they have to try and get hunting overturned. Number 2, they bring up a perfectly valid point in that if you cant use lead shotgun ammo, why can you use lead rifle ammo. The worst thing that is going to come out of this is that you cannot use lead ammunition so close to water, or a full out ban on lead ammo. The FWS already received, noted and said that it understood the positions of worrying about lead ammunition, so they are pretty much good to go.

The way the government works is by legal bribery from lobbyists. How you're thinking is long gone and the ways of the past.



X2. One judge just listed Midwest wolves again. The system is broken.


United we stand,divided we fall.
Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting [Re: Flicker Shad] #7501029
02/18/22 08:46 PM
02/18/22 08:46 PM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 986
Louisiana
M
MattLA Offline
trapper
MattLA  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 986
Louisiana
Originally Posted by Flicker Shad

The way the government works is by legal bribery from lobbyists. How you're thinking is long gone and the ways of the past. [/quote]

I understand what you are saying, but this part of the gov still works that way. It's still done by notice of intent, proposed rule, modifications to proposed rule, finalized rule, etc and so forth. Sure, sometimes the gov no matter what the comments say, are going to do what they are going to do, but the FWS historically is not that way at all. Public comments on things like this play a HUGE role in how the government decides how to do things.

@Wiz, I know man I understand they don't really care about lead ammo and want to just ban hunting, but they will use lead ammo as that means trust me. Depending on how the FWS argues, most of those points will be invalid due to other circumstances, it's just annoying because this is an example of what happens when you lose playing by the rules so you just resort to something that ends up making everybody worse off(lawsuits).

Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting [Re: Gary Benson] #7501103
02/18/22 09:49 PM
02/18/22 09:49 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,217
Armpit, ak
D
Dirt Offline
trapper
Dirt  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,217
Armpit, ak
Originally Posted by Gary Benson
[Linked Image]


"The Biden Administration’s expansion of hunting and fishing on 90 refuges covering 2.1 million acres in August 2021 is not being contested."

You are welcome!


Who is John Galt?
Re: Biden Admin. to close Public Land to Hunting [Re: coondagger2] #7501130
02/18/22 10:11 PM
02/18/22 10:11 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,043
wyoming southeast
D
danvee Offline
trapper
danvee  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,043
wyoming southeast
Will be writing to my reps this weekend hope the rest of you do the same, complaining on this site is not going to do any good. Like I have said before trappers are not an organized bunch for the most part to few are members of state or national organizations. Write to your reps this weekend and pass the word it could make a difference.

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread