Nobody can compete with Pontification Farm LOL. In addition to driving 65 hours to his 96 hours of work and managing the Indiana version of the Yellowstone Ranch he has time to type hours upon hours here. [/quote]
Now that there is funny

Impressive vocabulary left lane. You got the hours worked kind of right but really over shot the drive time. To get home is only 2.5hr less if there is no traffic. When I'm at mom's it's about 14 to 17 min to work.

Don't feel bad few can keep up with me at much. Keep trying I'm geting older and slowing down some and it's always good to have your goals set high.

Oh, so now you live with your parents, you win again, I had to move out years ago.

Which side of the 40 do you put your signs...? Doesn't seem like a well written law...2 signs arent much for covering 4 sides of a 40[/quote]


this is per WI law.

"1. If a sign at least 11 inches square is placed in at least 2 conspicuous places for every 40 acres to be protected. The sign must provide an appropriate notice and the name of the person giving the notice followed by the word “owner" if the person giving the notice is the holder of legal title to the land and by the word “occupant" if the person giving the notice is not the holder of legal title but is a lawful occupant of the land. Proof that appropriate signs as provided in this subdivision were erected or in existence upon the premises to be protected prior to the event complained of shall be prima facie proof that the premises to be protected were posted as provided in this subdivision."

i see no problem with this. it puts the burden on the trespasser to know where they are, not on the land owner.
Put 2 signs up on your forty where they are easily seen and your good.
After that call the sheriff and get any trespasser charged.
As it should be.
No need for silly marking every so many feet or what ever.

Yes I stay at mom's condo when I'm at work instead of my paid off 2nd house . I promise you don't want to try to have a contest with me regarding success. but if you do we can pm assets and net worth if you want .

It's nice to spend time with mom since she has had cancer. And you didn't think to ask who is buying mom's condo. like I said you truthfully do not want to try to have a contest with me. I'm actually surprised you moved out and are not still in the trailer park with your mother with your I can hunt and run my dogs on anyone's property. sure seems like that type of failed upbringing and lack of respect for others property.

In which way?

Im guessing a severe Napolean complex.

general when people are morality wrong and can't win an debate they switch to personal attacks and name calling. generally it is common with the left and those lacking intelligence.

Your wrong. You think it's OK to trespass. You can't back up your claims dogs can legally do what they want and your attempt to show law only proved your wrong. Then you move on to personal attacks generally the tactics of mentally immature and intellectually challenged. Several other here show the same traits often so your not alone.

if you or Mr. Left lane want to continue the back an further we can move to pm so this thread dose not get removed.

I sent a pm to diggerman would you like to move to pms.as requested?

Well. This sure escalated.

Now that there is funny[/quote]
Ahm the rootinest,tootinist, shootinest hardworkinest longestdrivinest mosthomeowninest ranchinest hombre east west north and south of the Missisipi

and don't you forget it diggerman;) check you pms yet? I could probably tell you fine non judmental fellows I also stay with my inlaws sometimes as well as mom. I know what a low life looser right! but you may want to consider I own the the house they live in and they rent it for an extremely low price basically for taxes and insurance cost. I'm sure you all are stepping up and supplying your parents and older families housing.

and Leftlane your right I also sunk just a touch and did the same thing and I'm aware.. care to continue in pm's.

I have not got a response from diggerman yet.

Again, I rest my case.

Naw..., turned into a chitshow.
$$$ is involved in EVERY aspect of PFs life. Every waking minute, (and most likely sleep time also).

Was just a few days ago he said guote " a man should be productive" or something similar.
Yet spent how many hours revisiting this thread and posting?

No one gives 2 craps about your net "worth".

or people's property rights trespassing or game laws apparently.

We're just sharing our perspectives. It doesn't need to devolve into personal insults. The insults detract from the overall value of the site. That said...

My perspective is that, if the dogs' owner couldn't stop them going on to OP's property, they should of at least leashed them and led them off without shooting once the bear treed. Shooting the bear on private property they didn't have permission to be on was unethical.

.

Don't know about the laws in other states, but here you can go retrieve the dogs without permission, but not take the game. I would think that with fifty states that there are fifty different rules on this, if not more.