because I am being realistic , the folks with Massive money in MGs are also huge contributors to campaigns , and they will not like thier investment peices made near worthless by open access.

but your suppressor and SBR folks are only loosing 200 dollars each and want to buy several more items without tax stamps

I htink repealing NFA would take a lot longer and a lot less likely to happen unless you get the court to do it.

either would be better than what I expect will actually happen. which is nothing will change.

How about protecting the 2A by prosecuting and locking up those prohibited possessors? Get those criminals statistics out of the 2A arguments and we would be better off.

I must have missed the protecting investments of wealthy donors language in the 2A.

Oh I know shall not be infringed , just we are at 90 years of infringement , I don't see that getting undone in a single term.

I would like to be wrong on this , but my view of the world is that money tells the people they bought what to do and not what is right.

specifically the SBR language was a mistake left in after they were told they could not ban handguns , they only went after SBR becuase they were sure that Americans would make light handy easy to carry rifles and shotguns after handguns were made illegal and there is a history of the Gov changing it in 1936 when they realized they had made a huge number of very common 22 rifles illegal and again in 1968 after they had sold millions of M1 carbines aka SBRs at the time to civilians in direct sales.

suppressors never fit the definition of a firearm they were regulated under.

X 2