Re: Teeth on a beaver trap
[Re: AJE]
#5709973
11/24/16 12:01 PM
11/24/16 12:01 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,535 Orergon
alaska viking
"Made it two years not being censored"
|
"Made it two years not being censored"
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,535
Orergon
|
Well, I use OV-14's for wolverine, and spring strength has never been an issue. However, they have cast jaws, so, a hairline crack in a jaw, (dry-fire?) is a remote possibility. I also use them for otter at times, and have a couple that are sporting about a 1/4" off-set, due to the otter getting tangled up and working the trap hard. As an aside, the factory pan/dog leaves a bit to be desired. WOBBLY! All mine now have the PIT system.
Just doing what I want now.
|
|
|
Re: Teeth on a beaver trap
[Re: AJE]
#5709977
11/24/16 12:06 PM
11/24/16 12:06 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 46,945 james bay frontierOnt.
Boco
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 46,945
james bay frontierOnt.
|
Problem with toothed traps is they couldn't pass aihts or bmps because the injuries they caused were not within acceptable parameters of the injury scale 8 times out of 10. Not trying to start a debate about traps, just stating the facts why they are no longer made.
Last edited by Boco; 11/24/16 12:08 PM.
Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
|
|
|
Re: Teeth on a beaver trap
[Re: AJE]
#5710025
11/24/16 12:35 PM
11/24/16 12:35 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,076 Maine
mainer
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,076
Maine
|
AJE, traps like the #14 and similar toothed traps are perfectly legal to use in Wisconsin as long as "such traps are located completely underwater at all times" (page 9 in the Wisconsin 2016 Trapping Regulations). So you can ignore Boco's pseudo-problem of following AIHTS, which doesn't apply in your state or any other state in the United States.
And those are the facts.
"...in a very few days we succeeded in taking over one hundred beaver, the skins of which were worth ten dollars per pound." Jim Beckwourth (1856)
|
|
|
|
|