Re: The Rio Grande and the Wall
[Re: GritGuy]
#6434839
01/20/19 02:37 PM
01/20/19 02:37 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,722 pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,722
pa
|
If an oil line can be built in sub arctic areas and under thousands of feet of ocean, then a wall can be built where it should not have to be, Danny your grasping at straws. Obama said we all could keep our health programs we liked too, see how that went !
Yes there are more pressing needs but your missing the point here of one against the many, if either wins then the other loses everything, that's why neither wants to give in.
Your seeing the same thing with SS and Medicare, welfare, there is no compromise to work things out, regardless of both sides seeing the need for it.
Demo's know for a fact the people want illegals curbed, they have admitted to the need, they want to control, therefore their need out weighs the need of the many in this country, so its a giant stall.
Rebup's don't wish to support a business back ground President for fear they will be seen as non-political so they behind his back come up with ideas to circumnavigate his shutdown, no one wins, the whole lot need excavated and replaced on both sides, with people who do want this country back where it's supposed to be ! Spot on. The dems voted for exactly what Trump is proposing now but are suddenly against it whole-sale. Go figure.
|
|
|
Re: The Rio Grande and the Wall
[Re: GritGuy]
#6434914
01/20/19 03:49 PM
01/20/19 03:49 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 16,953 OH
Catch22
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 16,953
OH
|
If an oil line can be built in sub arctic areas and under thousands of feet of ocean, then a wall can be built where it should not have to be, Danny your grasping at straws. Obama said we all could keep our health programs we liked too, see how that went !
Yes there are more pressing needs but your missing the point here of one against the many, if either wins then the other loses everything, that's why neither wants to give in.
Your seeing the same thing with SS and Medicare, welfare, there is no compromise to work things out, regardless of both sides seeing the need for it.
Demo's know for a fact the people want illegals curbed, they have admitted to the need, they want to control, therefore their need out weighs the need of the many in this country, so its a giant stall.
Rebup's don't wish to support a business back ground President for fear they will be seen as non-political so they behind his back come up with ideas to circumnavigate his shutdown, no one wins, the whole lot need excavated and replaced on both sides, with people who do want this country back where it's supposed to be ! I am shuttered, because I fully agree with what Johnny Raincloud said here. Great post Grit!
I wonder if tap dancers walk into a room, look at the floor, and think, I'd tap that. I wonder about things.....
|
|
|
Re: The Rio Grande and the Wall
[Re: hudsonfur]
#6434920
01/20/19 03:51 PM
01/20/19 03:51 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,722 pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,722
pa
|
Yes, Trump was offered around 30 Billion for his wall but turned it down. And amnisty for all illegals. noooooo
|
|
|
Re: The Rio Grande and the Wall
[Re: hudsonfur]
#6434943
01/20/19 04:18 PM
01/20/19 04:18 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 16,953 OH
Catch22
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 16,953
OH
|
But hudson fur, what about the bump stock ban, you have failed to mention that on this thread, unlike all the rest lol.
I wonder if tap dancers walk into a room, look at the floor, and think, I'd tap that. I wonder about things.....
|
|
|
Re: The Rio Grande and the Wall
[Re: hudsonfur]
#6434971
01/20/19 05:03 PM
01/20/19 05:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,505 central Haudenosaunee, the De...
white marlin
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,505
central Haudenosaunee, the De...
|
My original "point" was to ask about U.S. citizens losing their right to a natural resource which includes hunting, trapping and fishing along with some other outdoor activities. if the barrier was built on the line, we'd still have access to half the river, yes? the same half we NOW can legally fish, hunt, trap...
|
|
|
Re: The Rio Grande and the Wall
[Re: Rat Masterson]
#6434978
01/20/19 05:11 PM
01/20/19 05:11 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 7,735 Virginia
52Carl
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 7,735
Virginia
|
My understanding is illegals get to keep their bump stocks. I have suffered through all of the obscure points of view of this thread, waiting for just one justifiable reason to continue to the end. And hear it is! I don't laugh out loud very often, I did just now though. Well done Rat, well done.
|
|
|
Re: The Rio Grande and the Wall
[Re: Rat Masterson]
#6434983
01/20/19 05:19 PM
01/20/19 05:19 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 17,740 Central Oregon
AntiGov
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 17,740
Central Oregon
|
And chain migration. nooooo What we need is chain deportation to clean up the mess
Report a post club - Non member
|
|
|
Re: The Rio Grande and the Wall
[Re: hudsonfur]
#6435006
01/20/19 05:51 PM
01/20/19 05:51 PM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,119 Champaign County, Ohio.
KeithC
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,119
Champaign County, Ohio.
|
My original "point" was to ask about U.S. citizens losing their right to a natural resource which includes hunting, trapping and fishing along with some other outdoor activities. There is an enormous multutide of better, safer places for US Citizens to hunt trap and fish. Millions of acres of better places were made illegal for Americans to acces by obama. Fortunately President Donald Trump got rid of those executive orders by obama. The only reason I see that anyone would bring up US Citizens losing acesss to the Rio Grande, to attack our President, is that they are a liberal troll, probably the same liberal troll who has been banned from this site several times and who has snuck back once again. Keith
|
|
|
Re: The Rio Grande and the Wall
[Re: KeithC]
#6435030
01/20/19 06:23 PM
01/20/19 06:23 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 189 ny
hudsonfur
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 189
ny
|
My original "point" was to ask about U.S. citizens losing their right to a natural resource which includes hunting, trapping and fishing along with some other outdoor activities. There is an enormous multutide of better, safer places for US Citizens to hunt trap and fish. Millions of acres of better places were made illegal for Americans to acces by obama. Fortunately President Donald Trump got rid of those executive orders by obama. The only reason I see that anyone would bring up US Citizens losing acesss to the Rio Grande, to attack our President, is that they are a liberal troll, probably the same liberal troll who has been banned from this site several times and who has snuck back once again. Keith I thought of this when I was watching the Texas Game Warden program and they were going down the river cutting the mexican's gill nets in half.
|
|
|
Re: The Rio Grande and the Wall
[Re: hudsonfur]
#6435079
01/20/19 06:56 PM
01/20/19 06:56 PM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,119 Champaign County, Ohio.
KeithC
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,119
Champaign County, Ohio.
|
There is an enormous multutide of better, safer places for US Citizens to hunt trap and fish. Millions of acres of better places were made illegal for Americans to acces by obama. Fortunately President Donald Trump got rid of those executive orders by obama.
The only reason I see that anyone would bring up US Citizens losing acesss to the Rio Grande, to attack our President, is that they are a liberal troll, probably the same liberal troll who has been banned from this site several times and who has snuck back once again.
Keith
I thought of this when I was watching the Texas Game Warden program and they were going down the river cutting the mexican's gill nets in half. Notice there is no denial that the troll was not banned before. Look at it's current body of work. It has gotten more clever after being banned repeatedly, but uses the same words and sentence structure. Keith
|
|
|
Re: The Rio Grande and the Wall
[Re: hudsonfur]
#6435082
01/20/19 06:59 PM
01/20/19 06:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,505 central Haudenosaunee, the De...
white marlin
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,505
central Haudenosaunee, the De...
|
There is an enormous multutide of better, safer places for US Citizens to hunt trap and fish. Millions of acres of better places were made illegal for Americans to acces by obama. Fortunately President Donald Trump got rid of those executive orders by obama.
The only reason I see that anyone would bring up US Citizens losing acesss to the Rio Grande, to attack our President, is that they are a liberal troll, probably the same liberal troll who has been banned from this site several times and who has snuck back once again.Keith I thought of this when I was watching the Texas Game Warden program and they were going down the river cutting the mexican's gill nets in half. Mexican's breaking American law???? say it aint so!!!! and what ABOUT Obama locking up millions of acres?
Last edited by white marlin; 01/20/19 06:59 PM.
|
|
|
Re: The Rio Grande and the Wall
[Re: hudsonfur]
#6435094
01/20/19 07:09 PM
01/20/19 07:09 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,229 Armpit, ak
Dirt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,229
Armpit, ak
|
My original "point" was to ask about U.S. citizens losing their right to a natural resource which includes hunting, trapping and fishing along with some other outdoor activities. The right to a natural resource is right next to the right to a bump stock in the Constitution.
Last edited by Dirt; 01/20/19 07:10 PM.
Who is John Galt?
|
|
|
Re: The Rio Grande and the Wall
[Re: KeithC]
#6435098
01/20/19 07:11 PM
01/20/19 07:11 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,198 SEPA
Lugnut
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,198
SEPA
|
[quote=KeithC]
There is an enormous multutide of better, safer places for US Citizens to hunt trap and fish. Millions of acres of better places were made illegal for Americans to acces by obama. Fortunately President Donald Trump got rid of those executive orders by obama.
The only reason I see that anyone would bring up US Citizens losing acesss to the Rio Grande, to attack our President, is that they are a liberal troll, probably the same liberal troll who has been banned from this site several times and who has snuck back once again.
Keith I thought of this when I was watching the Texas Game Warden program and they were going down the river cutting the mexican's gill nets in half. Notice there is no denial that the troll was not banned before. Look at it's current body of work. It has gotten more clever after being banned repeatedly, but uses the same words and sentence structure.
Keith Yet folks continue to feed it.
Eh...wot?
|
|
|
|
|