No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: goldy] #6552940
06/10/19 08:52 PM
06/10/19 08:52 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,390
western mn
B
bucksnbears Offline
trapper
bucksnbears  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,390
western mn
Originally Posted by goldy
I largley blame the DNR for the fact wolves haven't been delisted. By them lieing about the actual numbers, they have delayed the process. How they can say we have the same amount of wolves as we did in the mid-1990s is ridiculous. Anybody that spends any amount of time in the woods in Wolf country knows there are far more wolves now than there were back in the 90s, and it's not even close. Moose will never recover until we manage wolves

BAMM, there it is!!!!


swampgas chili and schmidt beer makes for a deadly combo

You have to remember that 1 out of 3 Democratic Voters is just as dumb as the other two.
Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: goldy] #6552953
06/10/19 09:02 PM
06/10/19 09:02 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,470
MN
W
walleye101 Offline
trapper
walleye101  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,470
MN
Originally Posted by goldy
I largley blame the DNR for the fact wolves haven't been delisted. By them lieing about the actual numbers, they have delayed the process. How they can say we have the same amount of wolves as we did in the mid-1990s is ridiculous. Anybody that spends any amount of time in the woods in Wolf country knows there are far more wolves now than there were back in the 90s, and it's not even close. Moose will never recover until we manage wolves


Exactly. MN DNR could have made a very strong case for wolf delisting by exposing the real impact wolf predation is having on calf recruitment to the moose population. Instead they have been content with status quo, hiding behind the existing Federal protection as an excuse not to take any management action. The issue at the Governors level is between sport hunting seasons (which he opposes) or some modest level of control for livestock depredation issues. The topic of significant population reduction measures in the moose zone is not even in the conversation.

Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: walleye101] #6553111
06/11/19 01:42 AM
06/11/19 01:42 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,858
Beaver Bayou MN
Mike Kelly Offline
trapper
Mike Kelly  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,858
Beaver Bayou MN
Originally Posted by walleye101


Exactly. MN DNR could have made a very strong case for wolf delisting by exposing the real impact wolf predation is having on calf recruitment to the moose population.


Bears likely have a larger impact on moose calf survival.

No federal protection, and the state keeps reducing license numbers.


www.WildRiverTraps.com - Oversized Pans for you Mink, Muskrat and Bobcat Traps!
Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: Mike Kelly] #6553175
06/11/19 07:43 AM
06/11/19 07:43 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,470
MN
W
walleye101 Offline
trapper
walleye101  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,470
MN
Originally Posted by Mike Kelly
Originally Posted by walleye101


Exactly. MN DNR could have made a very strong case for wolf delisting by exposing the real impact wolf predation is having on calf recruitment to the moose population.


Bears likely have a larger impact on moose calf survival.

No federal protection, and the state keeps reducing license numbers.


Possibly, but if there were genuine concern for the declining moose population you have to consider the cumulative effect of both. Predation just does not fit their desired narrative. My point is that they claim Federal protection has their hands tied, but they have done very little to get that protection removed.

Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: Donnersurvivor] #6553218
06/11/19 08:44 AM
06/11/19 08:44 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 63,120
Minnesota
330-Trapper Offline

trapper
330-Trapper  Offline

trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 63,120
Minnesota
....but....but it's Everything else " in print" besides Wolves. Weather, Bears, People... ticks, Deer and their affect. But never Wolves, couldnt be them , Somehow they're "Organic & Natural "

....Like Goldy says, Admit the Real Wolf Numbers!!!


NRA and NTA Life Member
www.BackroadsRevised@etsy.com




Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: 330-Trapper] #6553222
06/11/19 08:55 AM
06/11/19 08:55 AM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,941
east central WI
D
Dirty D Offline
trapper
Dirty D  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,941
east central WI
Originally Posted by 330-Trapper
....but....but it's Everything else " in print" besides Wolves. Weather, Bears, People... ticks, Deer and their affect. But never Wolves, couldnt be them , Somehow they're "Organic & Natural "

....Like Goldy says, Admit the Real Wolf Numbers!!!


Maybe, just maybe it IS more than just wolves.
Sure wolves kill moose but are wolves ALONE the reason for the decline?
There doesn't have to be just ONE reason.

Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: Dirty D] #6553277
06/11/19 10:17 AM
06/11/19 10:17 AM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,584
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Offline OP
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Offline OP
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,584
MN
Originally Posted by Dirty D
Originally Posted by 330-Trapper
....but....but it's Everything else " in print" besides Wolves. Weather, Bears, People... ticks, Deer and their affect. But never Wolves, couldnt be them , Somehow they're "Organic & Natural "

....Like Goldy says, Admit the Real Wolf Numbers!!!


Maybe, just maybe it IS more than just wolves.
Sure wolves kill moose but are wolves ALONE the reason for the decline?
There doesn't have to be just ONE reason.



What if Wolf numbers decline, In response Deer numbers go up and due to that Moose decline further. Seems like a possibility at this point but who knows.

Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: Donnersurvivor] #6553592
06/11/19 08:08 PM
06/11/19 08:08 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,470
MN
W
walleye101 Offline
trapper
walleye101  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,470
MN
With 1/2 Million deer hunters you can manage deer numbers to any level you want them. That is active wildlife management, not passive observation.

Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: walleye101] #6553597
06/11/19 08:15 PM
06/11/19 08:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,584
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Offline OP
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Offline OP
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,584
MN
Originally Posted by walleye101
With 1/2 Million deer hunters you can manage deer numbers to any level you want them. That is active wildlife management, not passive observation.

Very true. It would be great to see a "Moose zone" established where management was based boosting Moose in the state. I would be immensely interested to see a county sized zone with few deer and major predator reduction.

Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: Donnersurvivor] #6553633
06/11/19 09:26 PM
06/11/19 09:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 9,324
Northern MN
O
Osky Offline
trapper
Osky  Offline
trapper
O

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 9,324
Northern MN
If anything is endangered in our state it's the moose, yet they fawn and whine over a wolf boom. As said above, the state is obviously lying about the wolf population numbers and the bear population numbers. Without truthful accounting there is no factual basis for a solution.

I agree, I would love to see a designated moose zone. I would probably never hunt one here, never did in the past either here but I sure do miss seeing those goofballs around my place.

Osky


"A womans heart is the hardest rock the Almighty has put on this earth, and I can find no sign on it"

Jabless in Minnesota

www.SureDockusa.com
Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: Donnersurvivor] #6553639
06/11/19 09:43 PM
06/11/19 09:43 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 10,485
MN
S
Steven 49er Offline
trapper
Steven 49er  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 10,485
MN
It’s been about 4 5 years since I’ve physically seen one around here Osky.

We had more than a few moose around here until what I would guess was the mid 90s. I won’t comment for any other region but I would equivocally say the Timberwolf wasn’t the cause of their demise at that time.

Last edited by Steven 49er; 06/11/19 09:44 PM.

"Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon". Milton Friedman.
Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: Donnersurvivor] #6553656
06/11/19 10:16 PM
06/11/19 10:16 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 25,413
williams,mn
trapper les Offline
trapper
trapper les  Offline
trapper

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 25,413
williams,mn
Open season on deer in the new moose zone.


"Those who hammer their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not."
Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: Donnersurvivor] #6553658
06/11/19 10:21 PM
06/11/19 10:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 256
Montana
J
Jackdale Offline
trapper
Jackdale  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 256
Montana
Common sense would tell wildlife managers in NE MN fewer deer, wolves and increased timber harvest would help moose numbers. They don't seem concerned though. It's a shame.

Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: Osky] #6553660
06/11/19 10:21 PM
06/11/19 10:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,470
MN
W
walleye101 Offline
trapper
walleye101  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,470
MN
Originally Posted by Osky
I would probably never hunt one here, never did in the past either here but I sure do miss seeing those goofballs around my place.

Osky


I would love to take part in a Minnesota moose hunt some day, only because it would represent a tremendous wildlife management success story to bring them back to sustainable harvest levels again. But I'm really not convinced that is the goal of the management agency.

Re: Minnesota Moose [Re: Steven 49er] #6553661
06/11/19 10:24 PM
06/11/19 10:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 9,324
Northern MN
O
Osky Offline
trapper
Osky  Offline
trapper
O

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 9,324
Northern MN
Originally Posted by Steven 49er
It’s been about 4 5 years since I’ve physically seen one around here Osky.

We had more than a few moose around here until what I would guess was the mid 90s. I won’t comment for any other region but I would equivocally say the Timberwolf wasn’t the cause of their demise at that time.



Steven.
The 90's is when the moose here started to fade away. That is when the wolf population picked up big time. As far as whitetail influence, they have been here since the mid 1800's and the two seemed to do fairly well together.
My private drive is a dead end at the place and is 2 miles long. It comes off a small gravel road. Along my 2 mile drive until the later 90's there was not a time coming in or out you did not spot a moose particularly in the low wet areas and often feeding on the trail in itself. During the early 2000's they started the trimming of bear tags. We have now got so many bears it's crazy. Wolves, well we've beat that explosion to death. I think the the expanding of the two A-team predators is the Biggy here.
As a side note, there are two places well seperate from each other but within 20 miles of me where I could take you tomorrow and we can find some moose. I shake my head when I think of those spots because you wouldn't think it but they are always there. To a point the big dummies have something figured out right..

Osky


"A womans heart is the hardest rock the Almighty has put on this earth, and I can find no sign on it"

Jabless in Minnesota

www.SureDockusa.com
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread