Re: 30 percent less birds
[Re: nate]
#6639316
10/14/19 08:34 AM
10/14/19 08:34 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 7,240 West Michigan
Getting There
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 7,240
West Michigan
|
WNV really hit our raptor in my area, never have recovered fully.
To Old U.S. Army 60-63 SGT.
|
|
|
Re: 30 percent less birds
[Re: tomahawker]
#6639320
10/14/19 08:37 AM
10/14/19 08:37 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,795 IA
teepee2
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,795
IA
|
Scientists/biologists and their surveys like this drive me nuts. Really? 30% less. Not 32 or 28? How wonderfully exact. Who’s counting now, who counted then? Where? What season?, time of day? Did a group of coyotes just hunt through that section? Point being there are so many stinking variables, the arrogance of science is thinly veiled. Here’s a scenario-last couple years I’ve always bumped a couple does out of a wood lot. This year zero. As a good biologist I declare the population is down 100%. You could have an Army counting birds and you would never be able to count them all, never. Yet, omnipotent science declares...down 30%. Of course populations rise and fall, we all know that. Here’s one for you pheasant experts. Where’s the pheasant population compared to 150 years ago? Up or down? I always like when the experts say pen raised birds can’t survive in the wild. Really? How did the pheasants get here? Fly?...from China. I can tell you why birds are down here. There’s no place to live. I can show you thousands and thousands of acres that are faunal deserts; no brush, no fence rows, no cover for a mile in any direction. I agree 100%.
|
|
|
Re: 30 percent less birds
[Re: tomahawker]
#6639354
10/14/19 09:22 AM
10/14/19 09:22 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,220 Northern Minnesota
BernieB.
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,220
Northern Minnesota
|
Scientists/biologists and their surveys like this drive me nuts. Really? 30% less. Not 32 or 28? How wonderfully exact. Who’s counting now, who counted then? Where? What season?, time of day? Did a group of coyotes just hunt through that section? Point being there are so many stinking variables, the arrogance of science is thinly veiled. Here’s a scenario-last couple years I’ve always bumped a couple does out of a wood lot. This year zero. As a good biologist I declare the population is down 100%. You could have an Army counting birds and you would never be able to count them all, never. Yet, omnipotent science declares...down 30%. Of course populations rise and fall, we all know that. Here’s one for you pheasant experts. Where’s the pheasant population compared to 150 years ago? Up or down? I always like when the experts say pen raised birds can’t survive in the wild. Really? How did the pheasants get here? Fly?...from China. I can tell you why birds are down here. There’s no place to live. I can show you thousands and thousands of acres that are faunal deserts; no brush, no fence rows, no cover for a mile in any direction. Trying to make sense of this post. 30% is just a number just like 28 or 32% but you are saying you would believe them if it wasn't a round number? That's irrational. The Cornell college or ornithology is a world respected school on everything to do with birds and they have decades of track record of unbiased studies all over the world. They are the ones who finally brought the problem with feral cats into the public. eye. If you don't believe them, you won't believe anyone. Period. No matter how much proof is put in front of you. Finally, your last sentence hit the target. All you have to do to know that there is a serious problem with birds is get outdoors more. Especially anywhere in farm country where habitat is being destroyed at an alarming rate and pesticides are killing off the food birds rely on. I don't need a college to tell me that bird numbers are down, all I need are simple powers of observation and enough common sense to look at the factors that add up to an environment where fewer birds can survive.
Last edited by BernieB.; 10/14/19 09:23 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 30 percent less birds
[Re: run]
#6639358
10/14/19 09:26 AM
10/14/19 09:26 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 18,624 Green County Wisconsin
GREENCOUNTYPETE
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 18,624
Green County Wisconsin
|
Organic agriculture is supposed to have wild life buffers. Does anyone know if the organic farmers are actually using wildlife friendly practices? not sure about all of them, I am sure some are just regular with different chemicals "organic chemicals" however I have a friend who is all organic meat , he rotational grazes his cattle , sheep and chickens all move to new grass every 2 days , turkeys pen moves every week , pigs have a large pasture to roam but due to possibility for escape it has to be fenced more than the Little that will keep the beef in . he wants trees because they provide shade panted a hundred last spring, has bees and wild flower buffer strips. his neighbor is all cash crop , you can see the erosion because he has grazed some areas more than 10 years next to the neighbors and the ground is lower on the other side of the fence . one brings in a millions of dollars in equipment at planting and harvest the other makes a trip out on a 4 wheeler each day to check his heard. he definitely has wild life , sometimes a bit too much and I have to help him out with some of it. this seems like a very sustainable model as long as there is a market for the meat. very easy on the land.
America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
|
|
|
Re: 30 percent less birds
[Re: GREENCOUNTYPETE]
#6639458
10/14/19 12:28 PM
10/14/19 12:28 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,693 S.E. Ohio
M.Magis
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,693
S.E. Ohio
|
Organic agriculture is supposed to have wild life buffers. Does anyone know if the organic farmers are actually using wildlife friendly practices? not sure about all of them, I am sure some are just regular with different chemicals "organic chemicals" however I have a friend who is all organic meat , he rotational grazes his cattle , sheep and chickens all move to new grass every 2 days , turkeys pen moves every week , pigs have a large pasture to roam but due to possibility for escape it has to be fenced more than the Little that will keep the beef in . he wants trees because they provide shade panted a hundred last spring, has bees and wild flower buffer strips. his neighbor is all cash crop , you can see the erosion because he has grazed some areas more than 10 years next to the neighbors and the ground is lower on the other side of the fence . one brings in a millions of dollars in equipment at planting and harvest the other makes a trip out on a 4 wheeler each day to check his heard. he definitely has wild life , sometimes a bit too much and I have to help him out with some of it. this seems like a very sustainable model as long as there is a market for the meat. very easy on the land. You're comparing a professional rowcrop farm to a hobby farm. Apples to banana comparison.
|
|
|
Re: 30 percent less birds
[Re: coonlove]
#6639620
10/14/19 06:26 PM
10/14/19 06:26 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,021 USA MN
Snowpa
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,021
USA MN
|
I have heard from many about the windmills. I can see about 50 of them from where i am typing-a couple are 1/4 mile from my house. I have frequently walked under them and have never seen a dead bird. I HAVE watched flocks of geese fly right through them like they weren't there and have never seen one hit. Not saying it doesn't happen-just that I have a ringside seat and it's not happening in my area. X2 live by hundreds and never seen a bird dead
Never Confuse Stupid With Crazy
|
|
|
Re: 30 percent less birds
[Re: BernieB.]
#6641992
10/17/19 01:55 PM
10/17/19 01:55 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 548 NY
whartonrattrappe
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 548
NY
|
The Cornell college or ornithology is a world respected school on everything to do with birds and they have decades of track record of unbiased studies all over the world. They are the ones who finally brought the problem with feral cats into the public. eye. If you don't believe them, you won't believe anyone. Period. No matter how much proof is put in front of you.
FYI the Cornell of the 21st century is not to trusted with these matters anymore.
|
|
|
Re: 30 percent less birds
[Re: charles]
#6642199
10/17/19 08:02 PM
10/17/19 08:02 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,585 MN
Donnersurvivor
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,585
MN
|
In the late 60s, I had a friend whose grandfather had been the light keeper of the Cape Hatteras Lighthouse. He told her that following foggy nights in the winter months, he would pick up dead Canada geese that that flown into the lighthouse during the night. Canada geese rarely come this far south anymore. that has more to do with agriculture than anything else. Plenty of Corn and wheat fields for geese to winter in as well as Nuclear power plant discharge areas for water.
|
|
|
Re: 30 percent less birds
[Re: nate]
#6642206
10/17/19 08:15 PM
10/17/19 08:15 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,619 N. Carolina
Scout1
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,619
N. Carolina
|
Hey, I finally figured something out!
------------------------------------- DJT & MTG in 2024!
|
|
|
Re: 30 percent less birds
[Re: nate]
#6642208
10/17/19 08:23 PM
10/17/19 08:23 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,514 Orergon
alaska viking
"Made it two years not being censored"
|
"Made it two years not being censored"
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,514
Orergon
|
No doubt that multitudes of birds die crashing into windows, hit by cars, get shreaed by windmills of various designs. However, current agricultural practices are not conducive to birds. No insects equals very few of certain bird varieties. This shouldn't be a big surprise to anyone that knows diddly about the "woods".
Just doing what I want now.
|
|
|
|
|