All true based on what I've read.

Making a huge difference right now for thousands who will have avoided an abortion and was born. Some day this horrible practice will be purged from those states who love life. You have reminded me of something I have known for a long time. You say you are not for abortion but defend it anyway. Lawyers rarely have a conscience. Especially liberal ones.

Answer my question counselor. LLL

I think many of you are celebrating way too soon. SCOTUS did not rule on the constitutionality of the Texas law. Their decision was based on the fact that the plaintiffs (abortion providers) have suffered no harm because no one ......not the state and no individuals.....is enforcing this law. Consequently, the plaintiffs have no standing.

Also, if you actually read the decision, the court says ......."Federal courts enjoy the power to enjoin individuals tasked with enforcing laws, not the laws themselves." Since no one is enforcing this law.......there is no one to enjoin.

Nevertheless this law will, IMO, eventually be declared unconstitutional because it does NOT include exceptions for rape & incest...............a clear violation of both Roe & Casey.

Regardless of your position on abortion, I would think most of us would want this Texas law thrown out. It sets a precedent that will allow any citizen to sue any other person for almost any reason...........like owning a gun. It is a terrible law IMO..based solely on that possibility.

I've never understood how abortion is a thing . Every argument for it falls flat.

Say you have a tooth that you want pulled . Nothing wrong with it , just don't want it. It'll take some dentist shopping to find one that'll pull a viable tooth " just because ". Let alone limbs or organs . Bizarre .

"During the Holocaust, Nazis referred to Jews as rats. Hutus involved in the Rwanda genocide called Tutsis cockroaches. Slave owners throughout history considered slaves subhuman animals. In Less Than Human, David Livingstone Smith argues that it's important to define and describe dehumanization, because it's what opens the door for cruelty and genocide."

You define undesirables as not human, then it is legal to dispose of the undesirables.

Your both so hard headed, believing your so right you can't and won't even try to reason any thing out. Now go ahead an give me heck, I won't click this topic again.