Leo Terrell ,a black civil rights attorney stated Kyle has an excellent case for suing Biden since he was a private citizen at time of statement.

I’m glad he was found not guilty, after seeing Kyle’s emotions during the trial I think he and his support network should be more concerned about him getting some mental help than going after people for lawsuits, he has gone through a very traumatic experience and will need as much help as he can get going forward.

https://thepostmillennial.com/flash...-was-part-of-a-white-supremacist-militia

"I don't know enough to know whether that 17-year-old kid, exactly what he did, but allegedly he's part of a militia coming out of the state of Illinois. Have you ever heard this president say one negative thing about white supremacists? Have you ever heard it? That's the reason I got back in this race because what happened in Charlottesville," Biden said in a 2020 interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper.

I don't believe that is quite accurate.


There was a campaign video that showed the Unite the Right rally in Charlotte on one side of the screen and a still picture of KR in Kenosha the night of the riot. on the other side

It is a Biden campaign video. The video APPEARS to equate KR to the "white supremacists" in Charlotte.

Those words are never used. It is only implied.

The only statements I can find from Biden are in reference to Trump. Not KR

Jim, you haven't looked into this very much. Try Googling "Biden tweets Rittenhouse is white supremacist" that occurred on the campaign trail in Sept. of 2020.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/rittenhouse-defamation-biden-tweet

Here's one of several videos of candidate Biden referring to Rittenhouse a's past of a white supremacist militia.

Biden also had a tweet or 2 calling him a racist and supremacist but I don't have Twitter

https://rumble.com/vphtcz-flashback...5NK-DEXho201xacBzi1nSUmGI163V4a424XLyLgA

After reading some of that, I'd say Kyle may have a case--after Biden leaves office.

Jim

Maybe, but wasn't the Paula Jones vs Slick Willie brought forward while the Rapist in Chief was still in the oral office due to the fact the exposure occurred prior to entering the office.

What's Clinton got to do with the not guilty verdict?

Jim

I think he's trying to say that he thinks a President can be charged while in office, for a crime he committed before taking office?

Oh.

I can't remember the details there. Was the civil lawsuit brought (I think) by Paula Jones and others allowed to proceed while Clinton was in office?

I've been wrong before, but I thought the law was that lawsuits are stayed pending a president's term. The policy for such a rule is that the president has more important duties than to answer civil lawsuits, which after all might be brought for political purposes.

Jim

Going only on my memory the supremes allowed the sexual assault civil trial to go forward because it was before his election

Willie the pervert was later in hot water for lying under oath that he "never had sex with that woman" when his trysts with Monica were brought up in the civil suit to show a pattern of sketchy sexual behavior. Monica saying they were in love and Willie was going to leave Hillary for her.

Btw, Biden didn't commit a crime. He may have slandered Kyle, but here in the US (as opposed to Europe, where they have no First Amendment) slander isn't a crime.

Also, btw, and apropos of nothing, I never voted for Clinton. I was a strict Libertarian in those days.

Jim

That's ringing a bell here. The lying scumbag should have been prosecuted for perjury.

Jim

Yeah after I wrote it I realized "crime" wasn't the right word, since we're talking about a civil case. But, you got my meaning, lol.

Willie so far as I can tell broke no laws either till he said under oath, "I never had sex with that woman". Saying later that oral copulation was not sex and it depends on what the meaning of the word is is.

That is all going off my memory which has some flaws these days.

Clinton was stupid in his arrogance. He should have settled with the plaintiffs before his deposition.

He had to know the question was coming. That means he didn't speak spontaneously. He planned to commit perjury.

Jim