Guy I work with pretty regular joined the operators union out of MO and took a job with a Kansas City company. He was back in a truck and on the same job I was this week. Said he got laid off. Union wouldnt send out him out on any other jobs. He is not the kind to draw unemployment. I asked him if the union bosses heard him bashing Joe Biden. He just grinned. Anyway he is non union now. The way I understand it he is now blackballed from being a union man since he went back to a non union job.

again, biden just showed the railroad unions how much he loves them. you think after he burned them they're still fans? if any of them were to begin with!?!?!

I don't need to check on anything.He LOVES your tax dollars to fund anti gun policies.Send him extra.

I think I'll withhold my opinion of unions. I don't want the Boss to give me my first banishment.

Me and the company I worked for had a good relationship.I pretended to work,,,and they pretended to pay me.

You clearly have trouble connecting the dots. Don't worry though, you can't be fired for it.

"Eight unions voted to support that agreement, but four did not. The legislation under consideration would impose the deal on all 12 unions, effectively forcing union employees to continue working"

Looks like 2/3rd's will be happy.

Blaine County: aren't you a Biden supporter? Reap what you sewed sonny boy.

Negative. Try again.

OK denial ,,how do you like your tax dollars going to support anti gun legislation??

You who choose to live in New York, pay union dues that go straight to liberal goals, including doing away with the second, call somebody else a liberal? Paying taxes is a law not a choice like your dues. I would try to explain more to you and have a battle of wits but you are unarmed. I would post more but I don't think a short bus rider who lives on this site because he doesn't have a life would understand. So in parting I will stay in my state where we can carry without a permit and you stay in your liberal Biden loving state.

You aint the sharpest knife in the drawer are ya.

Why wouldn’t they send him out on other jobs?

I
Funny how around in Owensboro and Henderson and srounding areas of KY have a very large % of the population driving to Indiana to work becuse the pay and benefits in KY are lower. Your homeschooling laws are ok but more restrictive than Indiana. O and you don't need a permit to open Carry but conceal carry and you need your concealed deadly weapons permit. That requires shooting and classes and fees. Indiana you can conceal Carry or open carry with out a concealed carry permit. And if you want a permit for when you travel to other states it's available free if you get the one that is good for 4 years. $125 for our lifetime permit and no classes or requirements to get just finger prints and money to the county and state police. So Indiana has you on that


Wyoming has both our states beat with no income tax and lowered tax rates. There is always some place better.
You sound like a 2 year old my state is better than yours. It's not like any of us had a darn thing to do with any of the laws in our states.

Becuse theee is much more to the story than the guy is telling.

Janus 100% applies to public sector unions, it was the public sector teachers union that spawned that lawsuit. The only union that I will ever talk bad about is the teachers union because it's the most corrupt organization to exist and does nothing to help teachers except to propogate a false reality of what should be or what shouldn't be. My family is full of teachers and educators, and my wife is a certified teacher. Despite my family being very pro union, my wife and I had nothing but problem after problem with the teachers union.

Maybe but thats all I got. He did say they asked why with all his construction experience he was so worried about a layoff, wasn't he used to it? Told me he replied " not for three weeks ".

LOL,,thats what I said."are you sure that the decision DOESNT apply ONLY to the public sector unions.Misunderstanding I guess.

Oh yeah, ok total misunderstanding there, my bad. I thought you were asking the question in sincerity, but now that you point that out I understand the rhetorical nature of it!

I was implying to Walleyed,,that the decision ONLY was for public sector unions.