Tucker and Sund interview - Trapperman Forums

No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter

Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum

~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~

Minnesota Trapline Products

Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products

Register Log In Home Forums Trapper Talk Tucker and Sund interview

Print Thread

Hop To

Page 4 of 4

1

2

3

4

Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: adam m] #7927656 08/13/23 09:26 PM 08/13/23 09:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2006 Very SE Nebraska G Gary Benson trapper
Gary Benson trapper G Joined: Dec 2006 Very SE Nebraska	Life ain't supposed to be easy.

Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: James] #7927661 08/13/23 09:30 PM 08/13/23 09:30 PM
Joined: Nov 2007 St. Cloud, MN trapperkeck trapper
trapperkeck trapper Joined: Nov 2007 St. Cloud, MN	Originally Posted by James Originally Posted by bucksnbears James is not one bit interested in this. He's just stirring the pot and you guys keep engaging him. If you keep telling lies about me, I'm liable to get riled. Just because I play around with Hal and have a sense of humor. Sometime I'll explain what that is, and maybe light will dawn. I appreciate those who provided information in their replies. So Sund was fired. Does he have a wrongful termination lawsuit? Jim And just who would he file it with? Surely, we do not need to define corruption.? "The voice of reason!"

Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: adam m] #7927685 08/13/23 10:00 PM 08/13/23 10:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2007 Missouri ol' dad trapper
ol' dad trapper Joined: Dec 2007 Missouri	Good point trapperkeck. If the law was straight forward there would be no need for lawyers. Lawyers are good at creating doubt which equals more money. Look how many couples there are who start their divorce amicable and end up hating each other and spending their kids college fund on attorney fees. Same with personal injury... And the list goes on.... Ol dad

Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: James] #7927704 08/13/23 10:23 PM 08/13/23 10:23 PM
Joined: Feb 2014 nm A adam m OP trapper
adam m OP trapper A Joined: Feb 2014 nm	Originally Posted by James Originally Posted by bucksnbears James is not one bit interested in this. He's just stirring the pot and you guys keep engaging him. If you keep telling lies about me, I'm liable to get riled. Just because I play around with Hal and have a sense of humor. Sometime I'll explain what that is, and maybe light will dawn. I appreciate those who provided information in their replies. So Sund was fired. Does he have a wrongful termination lawsuit? Jim He didn't say.

Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: adam m] #7927760 08/14/23 12:56 AM 08/14/23 12:56 AM
Joined: Mar 2014 Central Texas C Chancey trapper
Chancey trapper C Joined: Mar 2014 Central Texas	This country is toast if we don't come to some common ground. For the life of me, I can't find any common ground either side can get on. המשיח הוא המלך

Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: adam m] #7927763 08/14/23 01:29 AM 08/14/23 01:29 AM
Joined: Dec 2006 Coeur d' Alene, Idaho J James "Minka"
James "Minka" J Joined: Dec 2006 Coeur d' Alene, Idaho	People used to find a measure of common ground by doing something no one on either side now wants to do: Compromise! Jim Forum Infidel since 2001 "And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco

Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: adam m] #7927770 08/14/23 03:10 AM 08/14/23 03:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2008 Thailand Y yukonjeff trapper
yukonjeff trapper Y Joined: Jan 2008 Thailand	If I remember correctly republicans have been voting Bidenomics crazy spending bills into law. Now that's a compromise, and the destruction of our country by both parties. https://www.youtube.com/user/yukonjeffimagery/videos?disable_polymer=1

Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: James] #7927838 08/14/23 08:00 AM 08/14/23 08:00 AM
Joined: Sep 2008 NC B bowhunter27295 trapper
bowhunter27295 trapper B Joined: Sep 2008 NC	Originally Posted by James Walleye, that does seem odd. But the Congressional January 6 Committee was a one-sided investigation. Most Republicans refused to participate, and Trump chose not to appear. The January 6 Committee's work and report won't be allowed in Trump's criminal trial. I don't see how it's relevant at this point. I'm speaking of the federal trial over the January 6 and later events, not the trial about documents Trump had and refused to return. Allegedly. Jim DEAR LORD for a supposed educated man you sure do throw around a bunch of mistruths as if you know the facts. Jim, how about looking up who appointed the "republicans" on the J6 committee. How about looking up what republicans WANTED to be on that committee. Most republicans refused to participate after seeing what a circus it was going to become as history has proven. Just go look. You won't believe me if I post it. Go look on your favorite news site. Whatever that is. If anyone who isn't ignored wants to post the answers, feel free. Somebody copy and reply to this so Heir James will see this. He ignores me. How many lies will people believe before they realize their own idiocy?

Page 4 of 4

1

2

3

4

Moderated by 330-Trapper, Bogmaster, Cindy, cotton, Drifter, Maddog47, Paul Dobbins, Sharon, USMC47 🦫, Wolfdog91

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1