No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: adam m] #7927656
08/13/23 09:26 PM
08/13/23 09:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Very SE Nebraska
G
Gary Benson Offline
trapper
Gary Benson  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2006
Very SE Nebraska
[Linked Image]


Life ain't supposed to be easy.
Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: James] #7927661
08/13/23 09:30 PM
08/13/23 09:30 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
St. Cloud, MN
trapperkeck Offline
trapper
trapperkeck  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2007
St. Cloud, MN
Originally Posted by James
Originally Posted by bucksnbears
James is not one bit interested in this.
He's just stirring the pot and you guys keep engaging him.



If you keep telling lies about me, I'm liable to get riled. Just because I play around with Hal and have a sense of humor. Sometime I'll explain what that is, and maybe light will dawn.

I appreciate those who provided information in their replies.

So Sund was fired. Does he have a wrongful termination lawsuit?

Jim

And just who would he file it with? Surely, we do not need to define corruption.?


"The voice of reason!"
Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: adam m] #7927685
08/13/23 10:00 PM
08/13/23 10:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Missouri
ol' dad Offline
trapper
ol' dad  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2007
Missouri
Good point trapperkeck. If the law was straight forward there would be no need for lawyers. Lawyers are good at creating doubt which equals more money. Look how many couples there are who start their divorce amicable and end up hating each other and spending their kids college fund on attorney fees. Same with personal injury... And the list goes on....

Ol dad

Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: James] #7927704
08/13/23 10:23 PM
08/13/23 10:23 PM
Joined: Feb 2014
nm
A
adam m Offline OP
trapper
adam m  Offline OP
trapper
A

Joined: Feb 2014
nm
Originally Posted by James
Originally Posted by bucksnbears
James is not one bit interested in this.
He's just stirring the pot and you guys keep engaging him.



If you keep telling lies about me, I'm liable to get riled. Just because I play around with Hal and have a sense of humor. Sometime I'll explain what that is, and maybe light will dawn.

I appreciate those who provided information in their replies.

So Sund was fired. Does he have a wrongful termination lawsuit?

Jim

He didn't say.

Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: adam m] #7927760
08/14/23 12:56 AM
08/14/23 12:56 AM
Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
C
Chancey Offline
trapper
Chancey  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
This country is toast if we don't come to some common ground. For the life of me, I can't find any common ground either side can get on.


המשיח הוא המלך
Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: adam m] #7927763
08/14/23 01:29 AM
08/14/23 01:29 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
J
James Offline
"Minka"
James  Offline
"Minka"
J

Joined: Dec 2006
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
People used to find a measure of common ground by doing something no one on either side now wants to do:

Compromise!

Jim


Forum Infidel since 2001

"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: adam m] #7927770
08/14/23 03:10 AM
08/14/23 03:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Thailand
Y
yukonjeff Offline
trapper
yukonjeff  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2008
Thailand
If I remember correctly republicans have been voting Bidenomics crazy spending bills into law.

Now that's a compromise, and the destruction of our country by both parties.

Re: Tucker and Sund interview [Re: James] #7927838
08/14/23 08:00 AM
08/14/23 08:00 AM
Joined: Sep 2008
NC
B
bowhunter27295 Offline
trapper
bowhunter27295  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Sep 2008
NC
Originally Posted by James
Walleye, that does seem odd. But the Congressional January 6 Committee was a one-sided investigation. Most Republicans refused to participate, and Trump chose not to appear.

The January 6 Committee's work and report won't be allowed in Trump's criminal trial. I don't see how it's relevant at this point.

I'm speaking of the federal trial over the January 6 and later events, not the trial about documents Trump had and refused to return. Allegedly.

Jim



DEAR LORD for a supposed educated man you sure do throw around a bunch of mistruths as if you know the facts.

Jim, how about looking up who appointed the "republicans" on the J6 committee.

How about looking up what republicans WANTED to be on that committee.

Most republicans refused to participate after seeing what a circus it was going to become as history has proven.

Just go look. You won't believe me if I post it. Go look on your favorite news site. Whatever that is.

If anyone who isn't ignored wants to post the answers, feel free.

Somebody copy and reply to this so Heir James will see this. He ignores me.


How many lies will people believe before they realize their own idiocy?
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread