|
Re: Post gone
[Re: Paul Dobbins]
#7990871
11/10/23 01:34 AM
11/10/23 01:34 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
James
"Minka"
|
"Minka"
Joined: Dec 2006
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
|
I suppose that's as close as it comes. But the people of the time didn't consider a fetus to be a human being. Neither has Western law. It wasn't illegal to kill a fetus until recent years. When I was in law school, it wasn't a crime. We read a case in criminal law about a man who in a rage stomped the fetus to death in his ex-wife's womb. I argued against the law professor about whether the murder or manslaughter statute covered the man's actions. I said yes. But I lost the debate--and now I understand why. Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: James]
#7990872
11/10/23 01:37 AM
11/10/23 01:37 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
|
I suppose that's as close as it comes. But the people of the time didn't consider a fetus to be a human being. Neither has Western law. It wasn't illegal to kill a fetus until recent years. When I was in law school, it wasn't a crime. We read a case in criminal law about a man who in a rage stomped the fetus to death in his ex-wife's womb. I argued against the law professor about whether the murder or manslaughter statute covered the man's actions. I said yes. But I lost the debate--and now I understand why. Jim .. well that settles it … I’m riding into town to stomp some fetuses … why would you argue against it ?
Insert profound nonsense here
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: rex123]
#7990873
11/10/23 01:41 AM
11/10/23 01:41 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
James
"Minka"
|
"Minka"
Joined: Dec 2006
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
|
It's probably now illegal in your state, Savell. Most state legislatures have enacted laws to criminalize it.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: James]
#7990874
11/10/23 01:48 AM
11/10/23 01:48 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
|
It's probably now illegal in your state, Savell. Most state legislatures have enacted laws to criminalize it.
Jim …now there’s some fetuses around here that would make good trot line bait no doubt … but who am I to judge so long as I have a good supply of bream to cut … if that runs dry we’ll talk lol
Insert profound nonsense here
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: James]
#7990893
11/10/23 05:11 AM
11/10/23 05:11 AM
|
Joined: May 2011
Oakland, MS
yotetrapper30
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2011
Oakland, MS
|
I suppose that's as close as it comes. But the people of the time didn't consider a fetus to be a human being. Neither has Western law. It wasn't illegal to kill a fetus until recent years. When I was in law school, it wasn't a crime. We read a case in criminal law about a man who in a rage stomped the fetus to death in his ex-wife's womb. I argued against the law professor about whether the murder or manslaughter statute covered the man's actions. I said yes. But I lost the debate--and now I understand why. Jim What are you considering recent years, James? It wasn't illegal when you were in law school due to Roe V Wade but it absolutely was before that. In America, abortions began being banned long before even the industrial revolution with it being illegal in all states by 1900. So from when the first state banned abortion in 1820 until Roe V Wade in 1973, abortion was illegal in at least some US States. So, America is what, 247 years old? If you do the math, abortion was illegal for most of the history of the United States. Reference https://intranet.bixbycenter.ucsf.edu/publications/files/HonoringSFsAbortionPioneers.pdf
Proudly banned from the NTA.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Or I'll just end up walkin' In the cold November rain
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: James]
#7990897
11/10/23 05:19 AM
11/10/23 05:19 AM
|
Joined: May 2010
MN
Steven 49er
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2010
MN
|
I suppose that's as close as it comes. But the people of the time didn't consider a fetus to be a human being. Neither has Western law.
Jim
The people of the time of the bible fed people to lions, strung people up on poles, raped pillaged and plunder, women had zero rights and were considered property of their father and husband. My point? Just sayin.
"Gold is money, everything else is just credit" JP Morgan
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: Paul Dobbins]
#7990904
11/10/23 05:36 AM
11/10/23 05:36 AM
|
J Staton
Unregistered
|
J Staton
Unregistered
|
Tried that but according to some that don't count. The conclusion I came to is they, James and Rex, don't consider the child in the womb to be a child at all. James how did I miss interpret the verse, when it says we are the image bearers of God that's exactly what it means??? I guess my attempt was to show that according to God, a person has an identity before even entering the womb. Jeremiah 1:5. If they have an identity maybe then they'll follow the science and realize that is a human being in the womb. My conclusion is that Rex and James are trying to say since the bible don't specifically mention abortion to be wrong, although it's implied, it gives man full reign, biblically speaking, to continue in the aborting of the unborn.
Last edited by J Staton; 11/10/23 05:37 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: James]
#7991257
11/10/23 01:20 PM
11/10/23 01:20 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Goldsboro, North Carolina
Paul Dobbins
"Trapperman custodian"
|
"Trapperman custodian"
Joined: Dec 2006
Goldsboro, North Carolina
|
I suppose that's as close as it comes. But the people of the time didn't consider a fetus to be a human being. Neither has Western law. It wasn't illegal to kill a fetus until recent years. When I was in law school, it wasn't a crime. We read a case in criminal law about a man who in a rage stomped the fetus to death in his ex-wife's womb. I argued against the law professor about whether the murder or manslaughter statute covered the man's actions. I said yes. But I lost the debate--and now I understand why. Jim That doesn't nullify the commandment. The commandment wasn't made by man, but rather by God.
John 14:6 Jesus answered, " I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: rex123]
#7991416
11/10/23 05:45 PM
11/10/23 05:45 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
James
"Minka"
|
"Minka"
Joined: Dec 2006
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
|
How do you know the commandment refers to the unborn? God could have been a lot clearer, if that's what he meant.
The debate always comes down to whether you consider a fetus to be a human being. This is a personal question and should be between an individual and their Creator.
As someone pointed out, there were no laws against abortion until the 19th Century.
The Bible doesn't say "Thou shall not commit abortion."
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: James]
#7991417
11/10/23 05:47 PM
11/10/23 05:47 PM
|
Posco
Unregistered
|
Posco
Unregistered
|
How do you know the commandment refers to the unborn? God could have been a lot clearer, if that's what he meant.
The debate always comes down to whether you consider a fetus to be a human being. This is a personal question and should be between an individual and their Creator.
As someone pointed out, there were no laws against abortion until the 19th Century.
The Bible doesn't say "Thou shall not commit abortion."
Jim Be fruitful and multiply.
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: rex123]
#7991422
11/10/23 05:51 PM
11/10/23 05:51 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Very SE Nebraska
Gary Benson
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Very SE Nebraska
|
Maybe abortion should be mandatory for the party that strongly supports it. Problem solved 20 yrs from now.
Life ain't supposed to be easy.
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: James]
#7991423
11/10/23 05:52 PM
11/10/23 05:52 PM
|
Joined: May 2010
alabama
BandB
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2010
alabama
|
How do you know the commandment refers to the unborn? God could have been a lot clearer, if that's what he meant.
The debate always comes down to whether you consider a fetus to be a human being. This is a personal question and should be between an individual and their Creator.
As someone pointed out, there were no laws against abortion until the 19th Century.
The Bible doesn't say "Thou shall not commit abortion."
Jim God was pretty clear you just want to be obtuse. Killing your own child would most likely never occur to the Jews at that time, since they were considered a sign of God's blessing.
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: rex123]
#7991426
11/10/23 05:57 PM
11/10/23 05:57 PM
|
Posco
Unregistered
|
Posco
Unregistered
|
Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them.
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: rex123]
#7991462
11/10/23 06:45 PM
11/10/23 06:45 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
KY.usa
rex123
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Jun 2012
KY.usa
|
First I stated that I was against abortion . I was trying to show what the other side does when silly reasons are used to oppose it. second thou shall not kill .We as a people kill every day of the week in this country. But as usual Stanton you pick and choice your verses, what about turn your cheek in stead of fighting do you do that? What about thou shall not judge you do that all the time on here. What about treat your neighbor as you would like to be treated judging by your post gotta say no to that one. So mister walk on water what have you got to say? I can go on and on with these just trying to show you pick and choose from the bible like it's a menu in China.
Last edited by rex123; 11/10/23 06:47 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Post gone
[Re: James]
#7991469
11/10/23 06:49 PM
11/10/23 06:49 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2020
Missouri
Osagan
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2020
Missouri
|
How do you know the commandment refers to the unborn? God could have been a lot clearer, if that's what he meant.Jim Here you go James. Exodus 21:22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
|
|
|
|
|