No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Traditionally lubed VS PC cast bullets Results #8021051
12/14/23 08:42 PM
12/14/23 08:42 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 13,890
Amite county Mississippi
Wolfdog91 Offline OP
trapper
Wolfdog91  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 13,890
Amite county Mississippi
So I see people always talking about powder coated VS PC but never see any side by side stuff. Well instead of complaining about stuff I like to try and fo what I want to see done soooo.

As y'all know I've gotten ahold of the famous 30XCB mold ( NOE 310-165-FN-H3), it's apparently made so it just works in stuff like .308/30-06 . So figured it was a good candidate for this test .
[Linked Image]

Bullets where cast out of my usual crappy Clip on wheel weight mix...that a probably should have thrown out a year again but whatever :D, the Pan lubed ones where water dropped from the mold and the PC ones where water dropped out the mold and out the oven. Could possibly be a variable but not super sure till I test both.

Both were gas checked with the same Hornady checks . The PC ones where sizes and checked before coating and sized again after coating the pan lubed ones where checked and sized after pan lubing
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

Cases are mixed head stamp 30-06 all the normal cases prep stuff necks expand with the NOE .311x.307 expander plug. NO CRIMP so shouldn't be any distortion to the bullet at all.
[Linked Image]

Now as far as seating depth they need two separate ones I know for a fact the lubed ones where kissing the lands ,you can probably see the mark here , but no problems with bullets being pulled
[Linked Image]


The powder coated need deeper, ALWAYS CHECK or you'll do this
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

And our set up, 50yd front rest rear bag my chopped m1917, magneto speed Chrono
[Linked Image]

And the results! Now I shot the lubed ones on the right first then the PC on the left. I also bore scoped the bore before shooting either then after shooting both and imm be 100% with y'all....I'm not about to coul t that super low one on the PC , sorry thats a flyer laugh
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

Re: Traditionally lubed VS PC cast bullets Results [Re: Wolfdog91] #8021435
12/15/23 11:44 AM
12/15/23 11:44 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,604
West Tennessee
D
doublesettrigger Offline
trapper
doublesettrigger  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,604
West Tennessee
I have always powder coated before sizing and apply the gas check in the sizer die while I am sizing. Put the bullet through the sizer backwards,,, base first. I only do handguns with lead. In rifles I have only used commercial made jacketed bullets.

Rickey

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread