Strictly Trapping


No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers *** No Politics
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Trading Post
(Please support F&T Trading Post, our sponsor for the Trapping Only Forum)



TrappersPost
Please support Trappers post, a sponsor of the Strictly Trapping Forum



Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
MB550 vs Bridger #3's #8204352
08/27/24 04:39 PM
08/27/24 04:39 PM
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 857
Washington
J
Jingles Offline OP
trapper
Jingles  Offline OP
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 857
Washington
Reading a lot of post saying folks using MB 550's for coyotes curious why MB 550's (at $21.95 each)that has outside jaw spread of5 1/2 inches and inside of 4 3/4 verses say a Bridger #3 (at 14.75 each DC or 16.75 eac 4C) that has jaw spread of 6 1/2 inches. I was lead to believe the bigger the jaw spread with accompanying larger pan was better. Curious if have been told wrong. Seems the larger jaw spread would be more inclined to insure a full pad/foot catch

Last edited by Jingles; 08/27/24 04:40 PM.

The job of a Patriot is not to protect his country but to protect the people from the tryannical government
Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8204411
08/27/24 06:10 PM
08/27/24 06:10 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 5,976
West Central MN
20scout Offline
trapper
20scout  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 5,976
West Central MN
I just like the way they bed better than the Bridger's. Best trap there is is the one holding your target animal.

Last edited by 20scout; 09/02/24 08:04 AM.

Common sense is a not a vegetable that does well in everyone's garden.
Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8204438
08/27/24 06:29 PM
08/27/24 06:29 PM
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 490
Southeast Louisiana
S
Slipknot Offline
trapper
Slipknot  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 490
Southeast Louisiana
I started with Bridger 3s .Good trap. I went to The 550s they require a lot less maintenance and easy to bed.To me.

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8204451
08/27/24 06:38 PM
08/27/24 06:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 11,335
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 11,335
Marion Kansas
I started with 550s and then went to mostly all Bridger #3s. Sold all my 550s.

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8204452
08/27/24 06:40 PM
08/27/24 06:40 PM
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 490
Southeast Louisiana
S
Slipknot Offline
trapper
Slipknot  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 490
Southeast Louisiana
Yes Sir are yours Laminated?

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8204458
08/27/24 06:44 PM
08/27/24 06:44 PM
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 45
Malakoff, Tx
B
Busch56 Offline
trapper
Busch56  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 45
Malakoff, Tx
Ive always ran bridger #3’s and 650’s. I bought a dozen 550’s 3 years ago, lost 2 bobcats the first week they were set. They got sold to a buddy the next week. I know guys catch a ton of cats and coyotes in them. I’m sure it comes down to personal technique and knowledge that I possibly don’t have. But I do catch plenty of animals in #3’s and 650’s without any issues. Im by no means a pro, and I’m not blaming the trap. That is just my personal experience.

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Slipknot] #8204465
08/27/24 06:49 PM
08/27/24 06:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 11,335
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 11,335
Marion Kansas
Originally Posted by Slipknot
Yes Sir are yours Laminated?

Yes and base plated

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8204526
08/27/24 07:37 PM
08/27/24 07:37 PM
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 12,803
SW Georgia
W
Wanna Be Offline
trapper
Wanna Be  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: May 2018
Posts: 12,803
SW Georgia
A lot may be as to what your State allows. GA is 5.75” jaw spread, so I went with MB550’s. I even use the MB450’s and they hold coyotes and cats equally as well.

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8204527
08/27/24 07:37 PM
08/27/24 07:37 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 18,810
Rodney,Ohio
SNIPERBBB Offline
trapper
SNIPERBBB  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 18,810
Rodney,Ohio
The 550s have a larger "kill area" than what the specs say. the spread going level to lever is closer to 6" i believe. The jaws are more oval shaped. It is a good trap to get around some states jaw size restrictions that measure from dog to opposite jaw.

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8204702
08/27/24 10:23 PM
08/27/24 10:23 PM
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 717
NV
2
2bit Offline
trapper
2bit  Offline
trapper
2

Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 717
NV
My first traps were 6 Bridger #2 and 4 Duke #4.
I caught 5 coyotes and 2 fox last year. Didn't have a lot of effort in as work was non stop. 3 of my catches were in the Duke #4. #2's had many sprung traps with nothing in them. A couple were deer, but at least 2 were pull outs.

I was just deciding on this very comparison and decided on the #3's based on my limited experience. No doubt mb is an excellent trap, I decided upon a larger catch area.

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8204748
08/27/24 11:21 PM
08/27/24 11:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 85
Idaho / Virginia
Ryan Phoenix Offline
trapper
Ryan Phoenix  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 85
Idaho / Virginia
To echo what somebody else mentioned, sometimes different states have regulations about jaw spread - so traps that might be legal in one state might not be allowed in another state. I know that some people lean towards the MB550s for that reason (when limited by a slightly smaller jaw spread), but it's generally considered a better trap than the Bridger just due to the construction. Some will disagree and that's fine, to each their own. Personally - I run both, think both are great coyote traps, and if all I had were a few dozen Bridger #3s, I would feel very confident in catching coyotes with them. It's a great trap. I just personally lean into the MBs a bit more but have a number of the Bridgers as well.

One of the things I do, and this is just personal preference, is that I make a determination on the percentage of chance of trap theft when I make sets, and that somewhat determines if I toss in an MB550 vs a Bridger #3 in that spot. If I'm trapping a farm on private land and there's a super low chance of trap theft, then I use an MB550. If I'm on public land or on the edge of public, or if I'm anywhere that's even remotely visible from a road (more like a forest service road, where I use them) and there's a chance that somebody might see a catch before I get there, then I use a Bridger #3. That's really just so if somebody yanks my trap, which annoys most of us to no end and shouldn't be happening but it does, I'm not losing the more high-dollar trap out of the two.

If somebody told me that I could only use Bridger #3s and MBs weren't an option - honestly, I would feel more than confident that I would run successful sets. It's a great trap. I own a numnbr of both.


Idaho Trappers Association
Intermountain Fur Harvesters
Montana Trappers Association
Alaska Trappers Association
Virginia Trappers Association
NTA
Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8204855
08/28/24 06:24 AM
08/28/24 06:24 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,562
Northern Illinois
M
MChewk Offline
trapper
MChewk  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,562
Northern Illinois
Let me add to what Ryan wrote....MTP sells a cheaper #2 and #3 Bridger trap that have some exterior blemishes...welds on the jaw lamination were not perfectly aligned. The traps are much cheaper and work very well.....check them out! Great traps!

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8204887
08/28/24 07:22 AM
08/28/24 07:22 AM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,030
E central Il
G
Golf ball Offline
trapper
Golf ball  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,030
E central Il
Choose the trap you like , but if your having trouble with pull outs , don’t blame the trap. It is likely something your doing wrong. The list is not to long , too much dirt over the pan , not enough pan tension, sticks or rocks in your bedding material. Could be as simple as a critter working in from the side , you want the trap jaws striking the front and back of the foot not the sides for best hookups. This can happen with a properly bedded trap , but if it keeps happening you might rethink your trap placement.

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8204904
08/28/24 07:46 AM
08/28/24 07:46 AM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,193
N.E. Nebr
L
LDW Offline
trapper
LDW  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,193
N.E. Nebr
I have used #3 dogless Bridgers for 10 years. I 4 coil and outside laminate them. Excellent trap. If it is sprung, there is a critter on it. I have seriously never have lost an animal caught in one. You can't go wrong by purchasing the Bridgers.

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8204909
08/28/24 08:05 AM
08/28/24 08:05 AM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,330
Ks
Flint Hill fur Offline
trapper
Flint Hill fur  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,330
Ks
if you want a #3 sized trap an like the cast style jaws like the 550 just get some duke 650pros. I run Bridger mb and dukes they all catch fine

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8205075
08/28/24 11:58 AM
08/28/24 11:58 AM
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 585
GA
C
canebrake Offline
trapper
canebrake  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 585
GA
Jaw spread laws as mentioned earlier. Plus some people just don't like bigger traps for various reasons. It doesn't take a #3 to consistently catch coyotes.

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8205347
08/28/24 07:53 PM
08/28/24 07:53 PM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,862
Firth, Nebraska
jabNE Offline
trapper
jabNE  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,862
Firth, Nebraska
I ditched my 550s and just run Bridger 2s and 3s now. Not really even a fan of threes for coyotes they grab way too high for my liking. The two is about right to me.
I don’t even have anything still four coiled either. Took off all the extras and just run two coil and they work great.
The MB 550 I like the thick jaws but not a fan of the wider but narrower opening dimensions when set, jaw height isn’t very tall. It’s a stout well built trap but expensive. I can buy a couple Bridger twos modified and dogless and still come out ahead.
I do still have a bunch of the 550s but they are the last thing I reach for and only when the bridgers are all out and set and I need to make another set somewhere.
Just my two cents.
Jim


Money cannot buy you happiness, but it can buy you a trapping license and that's pretty close.
Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8205435
08/28/24 09:52 PM
08/28/24 09:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 294
Texas
Sharkhunter Offline
trapper
Sharkhunter  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 294
Texas
I run mostly 550’s but as somebody on here said I think last year a truly serious coyote trap starts at a #3 size trap. The longer I trap the more I believe that.

Last edited by Sharkhunter; 08/28/24 09:53 PM.
Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8205468
08/28/24 11:47 PM
08/28/24 11:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 533
Minnesota
MNEric Offline
trapper
MNEric  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 533
Minnesota
When Comparing the price of a 550 vs a Bridger 3 you need to take into account the cost of laminating and base plating. If you want to make those modifications. A #3 will cause more foot damage without these modifications. The price on a modified #3 is $19.95. So it is still cheaper. Every trapper will have terr own preferences and you will need at least two bags of popcorn to sit back and read all the responses.

Re: MB550 vs Bridger #3's [Re: Jingles] #8205486
08/29/24 02:00 AM
08/29/24 02:00 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,249
Rochester, MN
Teacher Offline
trapper
Teacher  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,249
Rochester, MN
About 10 years ago, I geared up for some serious coyote trapping. Yup, the MB550s were expensive, but I didn’t have to do any modifications to them. I like that the jaw faces were wide and had rounded edges, thus no cutting. If I caught a dog or fox, the feet weren’t cut and that’s important to me. Since I run mostly offset jaws, this has also aided in foot comfort.

The MB550s aren’t particularly good on boar coon. But neither are any #3s. In fact, the base to jaw height of #3s guarantees heavy chewing. If money was the issue, I’d go with Montana #3s. It’s got the jaw spread, with a rounded jaw face for foot comfort.

A guy I know fairly well uses Bridger #3s exclusively. They’re all 4-coiled and I think offset. I’ve noticed cuts across the toes on every coyote he catches. Because we face the occasional stray dog, I want my traps to hold, not cut, into the feet.



Last edited by Teacher; 08/29/24 02:01 AM.

Never too old to learn
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

Moderated by  Drifter, Wolfdog91 

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1