No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
. #8464168
09/05/25 09:42 AM
09/05/25 09:42 AM
Joined: Sep 2008
NC
B
bowhunter27295 Offline OP
trapper
bowhunter27295  Offline OP
trapper
B

Joined: Sep 2008
NC
.

Last edited by bowhunter27295; 09/15/25 09:50 PM.

How many lies will people believe before they realize their own idiocy?
Re: Defending the 2A [Re: bowhunter27295] #8464174
09/05/25 09:51 AM
09/05/25 09:51 AM
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
P
Providence Farm Offline
trapper
Providence Farm  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
On the grounds of mental disorder disqualification Trump would be correct. looking down and seeing a Johnson and believe your a girl is definitely a mental disorder that needs treatment.

Re: Defending the 2A [Re: bowhunter27295] #8464185
09/05/25 10:12 AM
09/05/25 10:12 AM
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
L
loosegoose Offline
trapper
loosegoose  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
Blatantly unconstitutional.

Congress makes law, not the executive.

The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution.
That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.

It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.

If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?

(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)


Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.

Last edited by loosegoose; 09/05/25 10:13 AM.
Re: Defending the 2A [Re: loosegoose] #8464189
09/05/25 10:16 AM
09/05/25 10:16 AM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Online content
trapper
Yes sir  Online Content
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Originally Posted by loosegoose
Blatantly unconstitutional.

Congress makes law, not the executive.

The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution.
That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.

It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.

If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?

(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)


Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.

Red flag laws don't follow those protocols.

Re: Defending the 2A [Re: Yes sir] #8464190
09/05/25 10:19 AM
09/05/25 10:19 AM
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
L
loosegoose Offline
trapper
loosegoose  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
Originally Posted by Yes sir
Originally Posted by loosegoose
Blatantly unconstitutional.

Congress makes law, not the executive.

The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution.
That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.

It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.

If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?

(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)


Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.

Red flag laws don't follow those protocols.

Yup. And they're unconstitutional too. And we should all be opposed to them just like this.

(BTW, Trump was supporting red flag laws when he said to take the guns first and give due process later. That's what that whole conversation was about).

Last edited by loosegoose; 09/05/25 10:21 AM.
Re: Defending the 2A [Re: bowhunter27295] #8464191
09/05/25 10:19 AM
09/05/25 10:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Online content
trapper
Yes sir  Online Content
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
The lefts game for years has been putting the right on the defense and it's been pretty effective as they have been gaining ground. Trump is reversing the strategy. Sometimes the best defense is a good offense.

Re: Defending the 2A [Re: bowhunter27295] #8464194
09/05/25 10:31 AM
09/05/25 10:31 AM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Online content
trapper
Yes sir  Online Content
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Compromise only works when u are asking for more than you hope to get. We've been losing because we are just trying to hold the ground we have instead of asking for more. Its the art of let's make deal. Leverage ur position.

Re: Defending the 2A [Re: bowhunter27295] #8464195
09/05/25 10:33 AM
09/05/25 10:33 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Armpit, ak
D
Dirt Offline
trapper
Dirt  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Dec 2010
Armpit, ak
"The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has again handed President Donald Trump an even bleaker set of jobs numbers, just one month after he fired the agency's commissioner over weak employment data.

On Friday morning, the BLS reported that nonfarm payroll employment rose by only 22,000 in August. Analysts had forecast the economy adding 75,000 jobs during the month. According to the agency, gains made in health care were offset by losses in federal government employment, as well as mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction.

While July's figures were revised up to 79,000 from 73,000, June's numbers were revised down by 27,000, dropping from 14,000 to negative 13,000. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate edged up to 4.3 percent from 4.2 percent."

Newsweek


Who is John Galt?
Re: Defending the 2A [Re: loosegoose] #8464196
09/05/25 10:34 AM
09/05/25 10:34 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Idaho Falls, ID
G
Grandpa Trapper Offline
trapper
Grandpa Trapper  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Nov 2011
Idaho Falls, ID
Originally Posted by loosegoose
Blatantly unconstitutional.

Congress makes law, not the executive.

The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution.
That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.

It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.

If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?

(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)


Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.


It’s a joke meant to trigger people with TDS.


An old man roaming the Rockies
Re: Defending the 2A [Re: Dirt] #8464197
09/05/25 10:35 AM
09/05/25 10:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Online content
trapper
Yes sir  Online Content
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Originally Posted by Dirt
"The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has again handed President Donald Trump an even bleaker set of jobs numbers, just one month after he fired the agency's commissioner over weak employment data.

On Friday morning, the BLS reported that nonfarm payroll employment rose by only 22,000 in August. Analysts had forecast the economy adding 75,000 jobs during the month. According to the agency, gains made in health care were offset by losses in federal government employment, as well as mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction.

While July's figures were revised up to 79,000 from 73,000, June's numbers were revised down by 27,000, dropping from 14,000 to negative 13,000. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate edged up to 4.3 percent from 4.2 percent."

Newsweek

And this has what to do with the topic of the 2A???

Re: Defending the 2A [Re: Grandpa Trapper] #8464198
09/05/25 10:35 AM
09/05/25 10:35 AM
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
L
loosegoose Offline
trapper
loosegoose  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
Originally Posted by Grandpa Trapper
Originally Posted by loosegoose
Blatantly unconstitutional.

Congress makes law, not the executive.

The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution.
That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.

It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.

If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?

(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)


Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.


It’s a joke meant to trigger people with TDS.

We'll see.

Re: Defending the 2A [Re: bowhunter27295] #8464200
09/05/25 10:37 AM
09/05/25 10:37 AM
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
L
loosegoose Offline
trapper
loosegoose  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
Originally Posted by bowhunter27295


Can someone make a meme for this please!!!


I've got one.

[Linked Image]

Re: Defending the 2A [Re: Yes sir] #8464203
09/05/25 10:39 AM
09/05/25 10:39 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Armpit, ak
D
Dirt Offline
trapper
Dirt  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Dec 2010
Armpit, ak
Originally Posted by Yes sir
Originally Posted by Dirt
"The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has again handed President Donald Trump an even bleaker set of jobs numbers, just one month after he fired the agency's commissioner over weak employment data.

On Friday morning, the BLS reported that nonfarm payroll employment rose by only 22,000 in August. Analysts had forecast the economy adding 75,000 jobs during the month. According to the agency, gains made in health care were offset by losses in federal government employment, as well as mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction.

While July's figures were revised up to 79,000 from 73,000, June's numbers were revised down by 27,000, dropping from 14,000 to negative 13,000. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate edged up to 4.3 percent from 4.2 percent."

Newsweek

And this has what to do with the topic of the 2A???


Apparently the bait was not attractive.


Who is John Galt?
Re: Defending the 2A [Re: Dirt] #8464206
09/05/25 10:41 AM
09/05/25 10:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Online content
trapper
Yes sir  Online Content
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Originally Posted by Dirt
"The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has again handed President Donald Trump an even bleaker set of jobs numbers, just one month after he fired the agency's commissioner over weak employment data.

On Friday morning, the BLS reported that nonfarm payroll employment rose by only 22,000 in August. Analysts had forecast the economy adding 75,000 jobs during the month. According to the agency, gains made in health care were offset by losses in federal government employment, as well as mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction.

While July's figures were revised up to 79,000 from 73,000, June's numbers were revised down by 27,000, dropping from 14,000 to negative 13,000. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate edged up to 4.3 percent from 4.2 percent."

Newsweek

Mods i request he get a vacation for politics outside of the 2A topic.... grin
At least remove the post for. Intentional attempt at derailing a 2A thread

Last edited by Yes sir; 09/05/25 10:43 AM.
Re: Defending the 2A [Re: bowhunter27295] #8464228
09/05/25 12:01 PM
09/05/25 12:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
G
GREENCOUNTYPETE Offline
trapper
GREENCOUNTYPETE  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
I believe we should all have guns , government getting into picking and choosing who is where government gets into trouble and unconstitutional begins.


America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
Re: Defending the 2A [Re: GREENCOUNTYPETE] #8464239
09/05/25 12:43 PM
09/05/25 12:43 PM
Joined: May 2010
MN
S
Steven 49er Offline
trapper
Steven 49er  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: May 2010
MN
Originally Posted by GREENCOUNTYPETE
I believe we should all have guns , government getting into picking and choosing who is where government gets into trouble and unconstitutional begins.


Of course


"Gold is money, everything else is just credit" JP Morgan
Re: Defending the 2A [Re: loosegoose] #8464513
09/05/25 10:57 PM
09/05/25 10:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Virginia
5
52Carl Offline
trapper
52Carl  Offline
trapper
5

Joined: Jan 2014
Virginia
Originally Posted by loosegoose
Blatantly unconstitutional.

Congress makes law, not the executive.

The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution.
That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.

It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.

If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?

(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)


Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.

Put the checkers away. We're playing chess here.
Of course he can't do this, and he knows that better than anyone.

Re: Defending the 2A [Re: bowhunter27295] #8464543
09/06/25 02:51 AM
09/06/25 02:51 AM
Joined: May 2011
Oakland, MS
yotetrapper30 Offline
trapper
yotetrapper30  Offline
trapper

Joined: May 2011
Oakland, MS
Simmer down there, Yes Sir, lol. While Dirt's post had nothing to do with the topic at hand as far as I can see, it wasn't political, it was economical.


Proudly banned from the NTA.

Bother me tomorrow. Today I'll buy no sorrows.
Re: Defending the 2A [Re: bowhunter27295] #8464544
09/06/25 03:21 AM
09/06/25 03:21 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell Online crying
trapper
Savell  Online Crying
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
What’s goin on in here


Insert profound nonsense here
Re: Defending the 2A [Re: bowhunter27295] #8464548
09/06/25 04:21 AM
09/06/25 04:21 AM
Joined: Feb 2025
Alaska
M
MatanuskaJim Offline
trapper
MatanuskaJim  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Feb 2025
Alaska
I am a Marine Corps veteran, a range coach, and a hunting guide. I’m about as pro-2A as a guy can be. The idea that anyone who opposes or thinks that the current president is garbage has “TDS” or whatever other nonsense you want to call it is just crazy to me. It’s even crazier how many grown adults have decided to act like children by being generally mean, if not downright hateful, just to “own the libs”. Do you even know any of these “libs” or are you just being a jerk?

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread