.
#8464168
09/05/25 09:42 AM
09/05/25 09:42 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
NC
bowhunter27295
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Sep 2008
NC
|
.
Last edited by bowhunter27295; 09/15/25 09:50 PM.
How many lies will people believe before they realize their own idiocy?
|
|
|
Re: Defending the 2A
[Re: bowhunter27295]
#8464185
09/05/25 10:12 AM
09/05/25 10:12 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
loosegoose
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
|
Blatantly unconstitutional.
Congress makes law, not the executive.
The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution. That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.
It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.
If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?
(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)
Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.
Last edited by loosegoose; 09/05/25 10:13 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Defending the 2A
[Re: loosegoose]
#8464189
09/05/25 10:16 AM
09/05/25 10:16 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Yes sir
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
|
Blatantly unconstitutional.
Congress makes law, not the executive.
The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution. That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.
It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.
If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?
(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)
Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.
Red flag laws don't follow those protocols.
|
|
|
Re: Defending the 2A
[Re: Yes sir]
#8464190
09/05/25 10:19 AM
09/05/25 10:19 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
loosegoose
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
|
Blatantly unconstitutional.
Congress makes law, not the executive.
The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution. That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.
It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.
If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?
(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)
Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.
Red flag laws don't follow those protocols. Yup. And they're unconstitutional too. And we should all be opposed to them just like this. (BTW, Trump was supporting red flag laws when he said to take the guns first and give due process later. That's what that whole conversation was about).
Last edited by loosegoose; 09/05/25 10:21 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Defending the 2A
[Re: bowhunter27295]
#8464195
09/05/25 10:33 AM
09/05/25 10:33 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Armpit, ak
Dirt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2010
Armpit, ak
|
"The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has again handed President Donald Trump an even bleaker set of jobs numbers, just one month after he fired the agency's commissioner over weak employment data.
On Friday morning, the BLS reported that nonfarm payroll employment rose by only 22,000 in August. Analysts had forecast the economy adding 75,000 jobs during the month. According to the agency, gains made in health care were offset by losses in federal government employment, as well as mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction.
While July's figures were revised up to 79,000 from 73,000, June's numbers were revised down by 27,000, dropping from 14,000 to negative 13,000. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate edged up to 4.3 percent from 4.2 percent."
Newsweek
Who is John Galt?
|
|
|
Re: Defending the 2A
[Re: loosegoose]
#8464196
09/05/25 10:34 AM
09/05/25 10:34 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Idaho Falls, ID
Grandpa Trapper
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2011
Idaho Falls, ID
|
Blatantly unconstitutional.
Congress makes law, not the executive.
The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution. That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.
It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.
If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?
(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)
Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.
It’s a joke meant to trigger people with TDS.
An old man roaming the Rockies
|
|
|
Re: Defending the 2A
[Re: Dirt]
#8464197
09/05/25 10:35 AM
09/05/25 10:35 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Yes sir
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
|
"The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has again handed President Donald Trump an even bleaker set of jobs numbers, just one month after he fired the agency's commissioner over weak employment data.
On Friday morning, the BLS reported that nonfarm payroll employment rose by only 22,000 in August. Analysts had forecast the economy adding 75,000 jobs during the month. According to the agency, gains made in health care were offset by losses in federal government employment, as well as mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction.
While July's figures were revised up to 79,000 from 73,000, June's numbers were revised down by 27,000, dropping from 14,000 to negative 13,000. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate edged up to 4.3 percent from 4.2 percent."
Newsweek And this has what to do with the topic of the 2A???
|
|
|
Re: Defending the 2A
[Re: Grandpa Trapper]
#8464198
09/05/25 10:35 AM
09/05/25 10:35 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
loosegoose
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
|
Blatantly unconstitutional.
Congress makes law, not the executive.
The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution. That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.
It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.
If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?
(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)
Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.
It’s a joke meant to trigger people with TDS. We'll see.
|
|
|
Re: Defending the 2A
[Re: Yes sir]
#8464203
09/05/25 10:39 AM
09/05/25 10:39 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Armpit, ak
Dirt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2010
Armpit, ak
|
"The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has again handed President Donald Trump an even bleaker set of jobs numbers, just one month after he fired the agency's commissioner over weak employment data.
On Friday morning, the BLS reported that nonfarm payroll employment rose by only 22,000 in August. Analysts had forecast the economy adding 75,000 jobs during the month. According to the agency, gains made in health care were offset by losses in federal government employment, as well as mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction.
While July's figures were revised up to 79,000 from 73,000, June's numbers were revised down by 27,000, dropping from 14,000 to negative 13,000. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate edged up to 4.3 percent from 4.2 percent."
Newsweek And this has what to do with the topic of the 2A??? Apparently the bait was not attractive.
Who is John Galt?
|
|
|
Re: Defending the 2A
[Re: Dirt]
#8464206
09/05/25 10:41 AM
09/05/25 10:41 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Yes sir
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
|
"The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has again handed President Donald Trump an even bleaker set of jobs numbers, just one month after he fired the agency's commissioner over weak employment data.
On Friday morning, the BLS reported that nonfarm payroll employment rose by only 22,000 in August. Analysts had forecast the economy adding 75,000 jobs during the month. According to the agency, gains made in health care were offset by losses in federal government employment, as well as mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction.
While July's figures were revised up to 79,000 from 73,000, June's numbers were revised down by 27,000, dropping from 14,000 to negative 13,000. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate edged up to 4.3 percent from 4.2 percent."
Newsweek Mods i request he get a vacation for politics outside of the 2A topic....  At least remove the post for. Intentional attempt at derailing a 2A thread
Last edited by Yes sir; 09/05/25 10:43 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Defending the 2A
[Re: bowhunter27295]
#8464228
09/05/25 12:01 PM
09/05/25 12:01 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
GREENCOUNTYPETE
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
|
I believe we should all have guns , government getting into picking and choosing who is where government gets into trouble and unconstitutional begins.
America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
|
|
|
Re: Defending the 2A
[Re: GREENCOUNTYPETE]
#8464239
09/05/25 12:43 PM
09/05/25 12:43 PM
|
Joined: May 2010
MN
Steven 49er
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2010
MN
|
I believe we should all have guns , government getting into picking and choosing who is where government gets into trouble and unconstitutional begins. Of course
"Gold is money, everything else is just credit" JP Morgan
|
|
|
Re: Defending the 2A
[Re: loosegoose]
#8464513
09/05/25 10:57 PM
09/05/25 10:57 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Virginia
52Carl
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2014
Virginia
|
Blatantly unconstitutional.
Congress makes law, not the executive.
The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution. That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.
It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.
If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?
(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)
Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.
Put the checkers away. We're playing chess here. Of course he can't do this, and he knows that better than anyone.
|
|
|
Re: Defending the 2A
[Re: bowhunter27295]
#8464543
09/06/25 02:51 AM
09/06/25 02:51 AM
|
Joined: May 2011
Oakland, MS
yotetrapper30
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2011
Oakland, MS
|
Simmer down there, Yes Sir, lol. While Dirt's post had nothing to do with the topic at hand as far as I can see, it wasn't political, it was economical.
Proudly banned from the NTA.
Bother me tomorrow. Today I'll buy no sorrows.
|
|
|
|
|