No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum ~ Live Chat

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: For Savell [Re: loosegoose] #8478670
09/30/25 01:47 PM
09/30/25 01:47 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
ky_coyote_hunter Offline
trapper
ky_coyote_hunter  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
Originally Posted by loosegoose
Somehow, I think I he folks that feel like slavery wasn't a big deal, or should have been handled differently, or can't say outright that slavery was wrong, would feel differently if I get were the slaves and their children were being auctioned off.

My ancestors were slaves to England....Doesn't change a thing in my view about the War between the States.


Member - FTA
Re: For Savell [Re: Yes sir] #8478673
09/30/25 01:51 PM
09/30/25 01:51 PM
Joined: May 2011
Oakland, MS
yotetrapper30 Offline
trapper
yotetrapper30  Offline
trapper

Joined: May 2011
Oakland, MS
Originally Posted by Yes sir
Originally Posted by Swamp Wolf
Only 20% to 25% of CONFEDERATE SOLDIERS owned slaves.

So, what were the other 75% to 80% fighting for?

One possibility was that a large population of them were economically dependent of the slave system even if they themselves didn't own them.


I think if you research a bit you won't find that to be particularly true. Slave labor depressed wages and job availability for those who weren't among the upper class, much as illegal immigration does today.


Proud Leader of Moosetrot's Squad
Re: For Savell [Re: ky_coyote_hunter] #8478675
09/30/25 01:57 PM
09/30/25 01:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Originally Posted by ky_coyote_hunter
I know exactly where your coming from, everyone else does too....I said I had absolutely no interest in owning slaves, and that my family never owned slaves.

That should have told you what you needed to know....Now on the other hand you also need to know what really happened so you can form intelligent questions.

Your do realize what "really" happened in history is always debatable right. As far as intellect you are the one not answering questions and taking person shots by trying to play off my questions as stupid. Thats usually an avoidance off the real topic when one is run low of counter points

Re: For Savell [Re: ] #8478676
09/30/25 02:01 PM
09/30/25 02:01 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
South Ga - Almost Florida
Swamp Wolf Offline
trapper
Swamp Wolf  Offline
trapper

Joined: Apr 2009
South Ga - Almost Florida
Originally Posted by Savell
… my family fought for the CSA and some of them did own slaves. The slaves looked healthy and happy in the pictures….. in much better shape than a lot of the crackheads I see wandering around today lol

My family history resembles this remark....^^^^^

I'm in no way promoting slavery (it was/is bad), but the war of northern aggression was just that...northern aggression. And 75% to 80% of the southern population took up arms for that very reason.


Thank God For Your Blessings!
Never Half-Arse Anything!

Resource Protection Service

Re: For Savell [Re: warrior] #8478678
09/30/25 02:05 PM
09/30/25 02:05 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
ky_coyote_hunter Offline
trapper
ky_coyote_hunter  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
Lol Yes'sir that's funny , Oh I think I could get right up into you with the facts, but this is Pauls house, and I would really like to stay around awhile....Carry on soldier.


Member - FTA
Re: For Savell [Re: ky_coyote_hunter] #8478685
09/30/25 02:13 PM
09/30/25 02:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Originally Posted by ky_coyote_hunter
Lol Yes'sir that's funny , Oh I think I could get right up into you with the facts, but this is Pauls house, and I would really like to stay around awhile....Carry on soldier.

Why would facts cause you to get a ban from Paul hes all been a pretty fair guy from my standpoint

Re: For Savell [Re: warrior] #8478686
09/30/25 02:14 PM
09/30/25 02:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Never known Paul to have a problem with a fair open friendly debate

Re: For Savell [Re: Swamp Wolf] #8478687
09/30/25 02:14 PM
09/30/25 02:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
ky_coyote_hunter Offline
trapper
ky_coyote_hunter  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
Originally Posted by Swamp Wolf
Originally Posted by Savell
… my family fought for the CSA and some of them did own slaves. The slaves looked healthy and happy in the pictures….. in much better shape than a lot of the crackheads I see wandering around today lol

My family history resembles this remark....^^^^^

I'm in no way promoting slavery (it was/is bad), but the war of northern aggression was just that...northern aggression. And 75% to 80% of the southern population took up arms for that very reason.

That's true Swamp Wolf, the raping alone cost a lot of Union soldiers lives.


Member - FTA
Re: For Savell [Re: warrior] #8478691
09/30/25 02:31 PM
09/30/25 02:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Here's the debate. The North stance on why they were fighting was to end slavery. The south"s argument had to be on states individual rights largely because pro slavery is a hard position defend. Similar to the abortion debate. One side is about the right of the unborn child. The pro abortion side use to debate whether the unborn child was a life the had human rights but that position largely has been indefensible for they have since moved to the mother's right of choice.

Could the debate be taken down other rabbit holes as to whether those were the main reasons for the war yes but those are the colors both sides flew.

Last edited by Yes sir; 09/30/25 02:32 PM.
Re: For Savell [Re: Yes sir] #8478692
09/30/25 02:32 PM
09/30/25 02:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
ky_coyote_hunter Offline
trapper
ky_coyote_hunter  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
Originally Posted by Yes sir
Never known Paul to have a problem with a fair open friendly debate

Asking me if slavery was okay is a premeditated setup, because it suggests the war was about slavery, that's not even a fair debate position from the start because the North was guilty as well.

I'm not playing your game....My views on slavery have nothing to do with it.

Pay attention to the people in the south that fought with no connection to slavery....You think they really fought to defend something they had nothing to do with?....Nope, they fought because their wives and daughters got assaulted, barns burned, livestock killed or stolen, etc.

Sorry to disabuse you of your ideas, these things get ugly.

Kind of like we're going to have a nice clean divorce, it seldom happens, and I'm not fighting in someone else's house.


Member - FTA
Re: For Savell [Re: warrior] #8478694
09/30/25 02:34 PM
09/30/25 02:34 PM
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
L
loosegoose Offline
trapper
loosegoose  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
The CSA believed in state's rights so much, that they wrote into their constitution that their states could choose whether to be a free state or a slave state.

Oh, wait, no they didn't. They required all their states to be slave states, explicitly forbidding them to opt out, in their constitution.

Re: For Savell [Re: loosegoose] #8478696
09/30/25 02:39 PM
09/30/25 02:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
ky_coyote_hunter Offline
trapper
ky_coyote_hunter  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
Originally Posted by loosegoose
The CSA believed in state's rights so much, that they wrote into their constitution that their states could choose whether to be a free state or a slave state.

Oh, wait, no they didn't. They required all their states to be slave states, explicitly forbidding them to opt out, in their constitution.

And the North was so staunchly anti-slavery they kept a few slaves back for themselves to remind everyone how wrong it was, Lol....Preach it Goose! wink


Member - FTA
Re: For Savell [Re: warrior] #8478697
09/30/25 02:41 PM
09/30/25 02:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Ohio, 48yo
OhioBoy Offline
trapper
OhioBoy  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2012
Ohio, 48yo
https://www.history.com/articles/american-slavery-before-jamestown-1619

“People of African descent have been ‘here’ longer than the English colonies.”

Re: For Savell [Re: warrior] #8478699
09/30/25 02:45 PM
09/30/25 02:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
My position would be basic human rights trump States individual rights

Re: For Savell [Re: warrior] #8478701
09/30/25 02:51 PM
09/30/25 02:51 PM
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
L
loosegoose Offline
trapper
loosegoose  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
We should auction off savell's sons for a t-man fundraiser. I'll start the bidding at $20 for big bud. I've got some chicken poop that needs shoveling. I promise to keep him happy and healthy, at least compared to a crackhead.

Re: For Savell [Re: Swamp Wolf] #8478706
09/30/25 03:00 PM
09/30/25 03:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Minnesota
330-Trapper Offline

trapper
330-Trapper  Offline

trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Minnesota
Originally Posted by Swamp Wolf
Only 20% to 25% of CONFEDERATE SOLDIERS owned slaves.

So, what were the other 75% to 80% fighting for?

I don't know.They could already marry their first cousin and their sister, both, so that wasn't one of the rates they were fighting for maybe it was better dental care?

jk, calm down


NRA and NTA Life Member
www.BackroadsRevised@etsy.com




Re: For Savell [Re: warrior] #8478708
09/30/25 03:03 PM
09/30/25 03:03 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
ky_coyote_hunter Offline
trapper
ky_coyote_hunter  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
Lol, it was the dental care 330, and we still don't have it. laugh


Member - FTA
Re: For Savell [Re: ] #8478709
09/30/25 03:07 PM
09/30/25 03:07 PM
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
L
loosegoose Offline
trapper
loosegoose  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
Originally Posted by Savell
Originally Posted by loosegoose
We should auction off savell's sons for a t-man fundraiser. I'll start the bidding at $20 for big bud. I've got some chicken poop that needs shoveling. I promise to keep him happy and healthy, at least compared to a crackhead.


…. my kids are not from submissive stock …. They’re whip your commie butt and roll around in that chicken crap lol

I reduce my opening bid to $15, due to the potential slaves needing discipline upon purchase. The current owner has advised that the slave is not submissive, and the whip and handcuffs I'll need to purchase to induce submissiveness aren't cheap.

Re: For Savell [Re: ky_coyote_hunter] #8478710
09/30/25 03:11 PM
09/30/25 03:11 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Minnesota
330-Trapper Offline

trapper
330-Trapper  Offline

trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Minnesota
Originally Posted by ky_coyote_hunter
Lol, it was the dental care 330, and we still don't have it. laugh

grin laugh


NRA and NTA Life Member
www.BackroadsRevised@etsy.com




Re: For Savell [Re: ] #8478714
09/30/25 03:23 PM
09/30/25 03:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Originally Posted by Savell
…. I wish yessir was my slave … even though he’s Caucasian and getting old

Lol
I love hard work. I can set and watch it all day

Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread