She was probably at work. Question is: is the death covered under Workman's Comp

This woman was a victim.
She was coerced and radicalized by other people with bad intentions to carryout mayhem which they themselves will not do.
These people are preying on weak minded people who are likely to snap, as this woman did, in order to further their misguided cause.
Did these people want her to die for the cause? Probably not. Will these people waste a minute to use something like this to try to justify their cause as in "don't let a disaster go to waste"?
That question is self-answering.

Wonder if it would help if they ALL toned down the rhetoric,,,

Reminds me of the old Chris Rock bit - “I’m not saying he should have killed her, but I understand”

Reports are circulating the she had lost custody of two of the three children due to the wife beating them and using them for an ashtray.

If I resisted police commands drove thru officers I,d be shot and it would not even make local news and it sure wouldn't get a dozen pages on here

Correct

Are you saying people got upset about a 2% tax on imported tea, but love a 40% tax on imported smart phones?

What is your point, lol.

Jeff who?

I would venture with all taxes and fees combined I'm in the 40 percent range.

Thank you for your service.

Near as I can tell “ thank you for your service” in Somalian would be ,,,,,,,, “Mahadsanid adeegyadaada”

2% of currency value then vs today, figure it out!
And the amount of currency available.

609.066

If a story sounds too good to be true, it probably isn't. I'm not seeing this in 609.066?

For your reading pleasure.

It appears this only applies if you have a badge ......a citizen is doomed in the same situation

It also appears the officer knew this in this case as he moved around the front of the car ( standing off to the right , cause he ain't no dummy ) and drawing his weapon before she moved . I believe right at that moment he had already decided he was gonna kill the dumb beezoe ......before she moved . I also don't believe she had any intention of running the officer over or she would have . Easily. Any contact , if any , Between the car and officer was due to the officer leaning in trying to put a bullet on target through the windshield. He missed and decided to put a bullet in her Mellon as she drove by .


He didn't NEED to kill her to protect himself, he did so because he WANTED to....bottom line !



No loss though.......just authoritarian overreach. !



Of course everybody has a different opinion.....lol

Antigov, I believe your bias, a bias that I share, is clouding your judgement here. She, and her partner, were clearly in the wrong and escalated the situation to the point the officer had to defend himself snd others.

Yes, it would be nice if officers stepped aside, ended chases, and generally did not use the most extreme measures but the simple fact is that once the decision to effect an arrest has been made then it is out of the hands of the arrestee and any resistance or force directed towards an officer will be met with greater force.

You sit on the internet all day, eat up fake information, get outraged and make dramatic and wrong proclamations that fit your political beliefs. See your J6 Bomber Total Miss.

Maybe this gal was wrong. Maybe the ICE agent was wrong. You don’t know from Facebook posts and some videos. I don't know either.

Nobody will know until there is an actual investigation and maybe a trial(s) where witnesses and evidence are tested.

Also, it is fascinating how a lot of you guys back THIS federal government in almost every every instance. It's still the federal government. Worse in my opinion but still the feds.