Several reports he bit off a law enforcement officers finger. Refused to relent, assaulted an officer. Seems justified to me.

I'm guessing the official line will be "he reached for an officers weapon"

Constitutionally protected rights don't have to be practiced one at a time. It's okay for people to practice the 2nd while they practice the 1st.....even if you don't agree with them.

There is nothing wrong with a little shooting, as long as the right people get shot……..Harry Callahan..

…. Constitution ain’t going to mean jack (This word is unacceptable on Trapperman) once the third world and brainwashed commies take over

…. Yall are dumb lol

You're right. Screw the constitution. Let's only follow the constitution if and when it suits us.

… or the founding stock

… the constitution means nothing to the 3rd world and commies

… and it’ll be gone quick once they take over

… this isn’t a political debate anymore… it’s a war

Not sure what about the constitution is not being followed. Law Enforcement removing dangerous criminals from our streets that are here illegally. They are criminals. You interfere with law enforcement and expect no consequences? Not sure how that is supposed to work.

You got ice, Savell?

… got rain in the low 30’s as of now…. Temp going to drop fairly quick tonight

I would rather have 2 feet of snow than 3 inches of ice rain.
Power lines down everywhere.

Surely you don't think what is going on in these places is practicing the 1st amendment?

… ^^^ I think he does lol

… yall got to realize the constitution was written for a certain group of people

… that group is no longer in control

For the present time.

Can we address the 1st amendment honestly?

The First Amendment protects the right to assemble peacefully. This right is crucial for democratic participation, allowing individuals to gather for various purposes, including protests, meetings, and demonstrations. The First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." This protection ensures that citizens can express their views collectively without government interference.

Historical Context
The right to assemble has roots in English history, evolving from documents like the Magna Carta.
It is seen as essential for a functioning democracy, enabling collective action and advocacy for change.

Legal Interpretations
Courts have recognized this right as fundamental, allowing for peaceful protests and gatherings.
Restrictions can be placed on time, place, and manner, but not on the content of the assembly.

Now if we look at the 2nd

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to keep and bear arms. Ratified in 1791, it was influenced by English common law and the English Bill of Rights of 1689. The amendment has been the subject of extensive legal and political debate, particularly regarding whether it protects an individual's right to possess firearms or if it is tied to militia service.

Key Aspects
Individual Rights vs. Militia: Modern interpretations often focus on whether the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to own firearms for self-defense or if it is limited to collective rights associated with state militias.

Legal Precedents: Landmark Supreme Court cases, such as District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), affirmed that individuals have the right to possess firearms for lawful purposes, including self-defense within the home.

Ongoing Debates: Discussions continue regarding gun control measures and their compatibility with the Second Amendment, reflecting a broader societal debate on public safety versus individual rights.

There is a lot to consider in this situation. The gathering is not a gathering of peaceful redress of grievances with the government nor is it a peaceful assembly. Therefore, since it is not peaceful, as you constitutionalists like to point out, then possession, as affirmed by the Heller case for lawful purposes, would be a threatening act giving law enforcement officials concern for their own safety and safety of the public.

I hear what you are saying and I have no doubt you will come back at this in your typical drama queen style, but this is not a cut and dry case of violation of the constitution if you actually go by what the constitution says.

And FTR I do not like Noems wording either.

Now considering all of this, how is it J6ers were arrested en masse but these guys are roaming free?

Can we get some honesty here?

Well, its interesting that Blaine County shows up now when we haven't heard anything from him during the Marty fire and tman response to that situation, which has been great by the way!!. But BC's TDS got the best of him and now weighs in that it must not be be a righteousness shoot after 4 fed LEOS tussle with the guy for for a while AND THEN decide to fill him full of holes.

What I've heard, is that the Antifa martyr did get a hold of his Sig and got at least one shot off before the fed LEOs drilled him. Something obviously changed when 4 LEOs were wrestling with this guy to cuff him and then suddenly jump back and two of them shoot. Play stupid games (I want to be a "death by cop martyr") and win stupid prizes.

Again, we'll see how many buildings burn tonight in Minneapolis.

I wondered about that from watching the video. There was one shot, a hesitation, and then the rest of the shots.

All we get from bc is an honest representation of what a legit case of TDS looks like. Sad that he still wonders why his libertarian party can't get a foot hold. Hang out with stupid people and you get associated as stupid.

And yes, if MSTP doesn't burn tonight I will be incredibly surprised. If nothing else, they will catch the buildings on fire for warmth.

About 4 pm or so, before I got into some phone conversations, I did see a curious anomaly of about half a dozen or more guys on top of one of the intersection buildings whereas none of the other buildings had people on the roofs although there were several thousand people in the streets. I was trying to discuss with one of my phone people if those guys were there to protect the building from potential arsonists and other such trash later this evening or where they Antifa types allowed into the building and then getting a roof top view.

I'm thinking the former because why only one building?

We'll see if that building is still standing in the morning...