No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: One less shoplifter [Re: HobbieTrapper] #7832521
03/29/23 09:23 AM
03/29/23 09:23 AM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,252
Maine, Aroostook
Posco Offline
trapper
Posco  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,252
Maine, Aroostook
Originally Posted by HobbieTrapper
I mean the argument for the police is what if the perp gets the gun that was brought into the situation. You know the no weapon thing is out the window for them because they always bring one in. Is a permitted individual responsible for his weapon and the security of it?


You know an anti would find you liable. I probably wouldn't.

Re: One less shoplifter [Re: Posco] #7832525
03/29/23 09:34 AM
03/29/23 09:34 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 28,715
Eastern Shore of Maryland
HobbieTrapper Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"
HobbieTrapper  Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 28,715
Eastern Shore of Maryland
Originally Posted by Posco
Originally Posted by HobbieTrapper
I mean the argument for the police is what if the perp gets the gun that was brought into the situation. You know the no weapon thing is out the window for them because they always bring one in. Is a permitted individual responsible for his weapon and the security of it?


You know an anti would find you liable. I probably wouldn't.


Would an anti consider that fact as a defense of retaining that liability and any force required to do so?


-Goofy-
Re: One less shoplifter [Re: HobbieTrapper] #7832527
03/29/23 09:37 AM
03/29/23 09:37 AM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,252
Maine, Aroostook
Posco Offline
trapper
Posco  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,252
Maine, Aroostook
Originally Posted by HobbieTrapper
Would an anti consider that fact as a defense of retaining that liability and any force required to do so?

Come again

Re: One less shoplifter [Re: AntiGov] #7832531
03/29/23 09:43 AM
03/29/23 09:43 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 28,715
Eastern Shore of Maryland
HobbieTrapper Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"
HobbieTrapper  Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 28,715
Eastern Shore of Maryland
If a CC is going to have liability for the weapon even after he no longer has possession then a juror would have to consider what lengths may be necessary to retain possession.


-Goofy-
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread