Re: Would Trapper Talk Be Better For This?
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#4788957
12/10/14 10:11 AM
12/10/14 10:11 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Central Ohio
Dirk Shearer
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2012
Central Ohio
|
Waste not want not.
I averaged $13.55 on my rats last year for the hides, get $1.50 each for the meat.
Averaged $17.03 on raccoon, $26+ on red fox. I sell a few dressed raccoon for $5-$10 each year.
Skunk essence 10-15 per ounce (my kids sold some put up skunks for a $17 average at a local sale), Beaver castor 30 per pound. If you catch spring rats I think I remember seeing an offer of at least $125 per quart. Squirrel tails $.10-$.25 each.
It takes me about 2-3 minutes to skin a raccoon and another 6-10 to scrape it and put it on a board. I have a total of 8-15 minutes in that. Rats in about half that.
All this for animals I have been paid to catch already!!!!!
Coyotes I get tanned and have yet to sell one for under $75 with the highest being $225.
Beaver really are NOT worth the work but I have a buddy who supplements his family dining with them, so he gets the call to process the beavs.
My point being, don't waste a resource if you can help it.
If you are a Nuisance trapper only, find a fur trapper to "donate" your animals to. I am sure he/she will appreciate it.
Dirk E. Shearer, President The Wildlife Control Company, Inc. "Cause if you won't put your real name on it, you probably shouldn't hit send"
|
|
|
Re: Would Trapper Talk Be Better For This?
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#4789139
12/10/14 12:08 PM
12/10/14 12:08 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
mequon, wisconsin
Paul Winkelmann
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Jul 2008
mequon, wisconsin
|
Dirk, I'm not big on wasting animals either. Healthy animal are relocated ( Even skunks ) Young fox go to a rehabber. Good eating
animals like muskrat and beaver are fed to animals like coyotes, opossum, raccoons, etc. Donating fur to a market that is already
very depressed doesn't make sense to me. With all that killing, drying, skinning, fleshing, stretching, tanning, gutting, boning, and
scent extraction, when do you find time to do ADC work?
|
|
|
Re: Would Trapper Talk Be Better For This?
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#4789491
12/10/14 04:30 PM
12/10/14 04:30 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Central Ohio
Dirk Shearer
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2012
Central Ohio
|
Paul, I bet I'm not that unlike you. I had an old army cot in my office, under my desk, at my last job so I could work late, sleep in my office, and be the first one in in the morning (luckily I had a shower beside my office too). Before I turned 40 I never slept  . Now I rarely sleep. When I turn 50 (next year!!!) I might try to get some good sleep, then when I get your age I'll start to nap on occasion!!!!! Just kidding. I make time as time allows. I have four kids and there is usually one of them who is willing to skin a coon for a couple bucks. When things get a bit slow, or I need a break from the rat race, I'll fire up my wood stove and spend some time in the fur shed. Freezers keep stuff for a surprisingly long time. Don't attempt this with your old ice chest though. Like I said, it doesn't take me much time though. I trapped back in the golden age too. Paid for my first truck with cash from my furs. It wasn't much of a truck but it was paid for in cash by a seventeen year old kid. In fact, I used to put up over 400 coon a year. The last time I did that was about two years after I started nuisance work full time. Now it is pretty much just what we nab doing nuisance work. A coon takes about 10-15 minutes, rats about 5-8 minutes, drawing essence from a skunk about 2 minutes. Do the math and its pretty decent money. Four to six coon per hour, at $17 is $68-102 per hour. 7-12 muskrats per hour at $13.55 pelt & $1.50 meat, is $105.35-180.50 per hour. I probably average about 1/3 ounce of essence per skunk, 30 skunks per hour equals 10 ounces. This means $100-150 per hour on that. As you can see, it adds up pretty quickly. On the other hand, if you had to figure in your time and fuel to capture them (which has already been accounted for on the "nuisance" side) you wouldn't be making much at all. Once you have done this a while, the processing takes a fraction of the time of the catching. If you are just throwing it out, find someone who could use the money and let them take 'em off your hands (if legal in your state). The plus for you is you won't have to pay for disposal. By the way, you're not donating furs to a market, you're donating them to a person who will put some time into it and receive a return for their expertise. Let them decide if it is worth the effort. I bet you would be surprised at who is willing to turn your trash into their treasure. Heck, it may restore your faith in some young people who are still willing to work hard!!!
Dirk E. Shearer, President The Wildlife Control Company, Inc. "Cause if you won't put your real name on it, you probably shouldn't hit send"
|
|
|
Re: Would Trapper Talk Be Better For This?
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#4790536
12/11/14 01:40 AM
12/11/14 01:40 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Tipton, IN
Travis Wolford
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2009
Tipton, IN
|
Right but the same people don't think it's a crime to waste your money. You know if you buy a bow tag and don't harvest a deer that tag is no good when gun season comes in. I know that isn't really the same thing but it's still irritating. Maybe a better analogy would be the HVAC guy that sells you a new furnace and because he's such a nice guy he only charges you 50 bucks to haul off the old one for you that by the way he drops off at the scrap yard and because he's a good guy and recycled it the scrap yard gives him a reward for his good deed at the rate of 200 dollars a ton of course.
it is not a stupid question if you do not know the answer
|
|
|
Re: Would Trapper Talk Be Better For This?
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#4790767
12/11/14 09:16 AM
12/11/14 09:16 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Central Ohio
Dirk Shearer
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2012
Central Ohio
|
Lundy,
Some in our Division of Wildlife made the same argument about double dipping (though most did not) when we were going over our law changes several years ago.
I made the argument that tree care companies are paid to take trees out. Do you view them as double dippers if they sell the logs for lumber or cut them up and sell as fire wood? Or do you view them as good stewards of a natural renewable resource? That made the point I wanted!
We came to the agreement that you can sell animals taken under your Commercial Wild Animal Control Operators License as long as you also purchase the appropriate Hunting and Fur Taker Licenses.
You may want to make this same point with the powers that be in Minnesota.
Dirk E. Shearer, President The Wildlife Control Company, Inc. "Cause if you won't put your real name on it, you probably shouldn't hit send"
|
|
|
Re: Would Trapper Talk Be Better For This?
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#4791624
12/11/14 07:57 PM
12/11/14 07:57 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
OH
Eric Arnold
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2013
OH
|
Paul,
You need to take into account state regulations. Not all of use live in a state where we or the client get to decide the animals outcome. In Ohio, we must release on site or kill beaver, coyote, fox, opossum, raccoon, and skunks. So there is no release and get rehired to capture it again. For states like Ohio, it turns into an expense with carcass disposal (usually charged by the pound) so why not lighten the load by putting up some fur and/or selling carcasses?
Eric Arnold Publishing Editor W.C.T. Magazine Editor The Fur Taker Magazine
|
|
|
Re: Would Trapper Talk Be Better For This?
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#4791854
12/11/14 09:37 PM
12/11/14 09:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Wisconsin
jooleyen
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2013
Wisconsin
|
Sure, you older guys can quit hauling in a barrel full of nearly worthless fur and teach kids to trap. YEAH! I wish someone near me could teach me. If there is anybody near Waukesha, WI who wants to donate animals, I'll gladly take them. I need the fur handling practice plus I tan them and use them.
|
|
|
Re: Would Trapper Talk Be Better For This?
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#4791952
12/11/14 10:07 PM
12/11/14 10:07 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Mt. Olive, IL
Ron Scheller
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Mt. Olive, IL
|
Raccoons averaged $13.41. In 1978 I averaged $40.60. You cannot make gas mileage for 13 bucks and change. Quit killing coons! Paul, I'm a bit surprised that you view fur trapping as a money-making endeavor. Sure, I've had some great years (economics) fur trapping, but it's usually a break-even or trap at a loss hobby. Again, WCO work and fur trapping are 2 different worlds. Fur trappers are USUALLY hobby trappers and do so for recreational reasons. They simply love it. No different than duck hunting. Ducks do not taste THAT good, to stand in a blind all day in 20 degree temps and sleet. I will admit there are fur trappers who only trap when prices are high, but more that do it because they enjoy it. If they make a little money, that's good, but if they don't, that's just as good. I've trapped muskrats by the hundreds whether they were 10 bucks or $1.50. Never miss a year. DNR sets season dates (typically with no limits) to insure enough can be harvested to help minimize property damages and keep the populations stable/healthy. Muskrats don't care (or know) if they are worth a buck or 12 bucks... they still destroy dams, levees and shorelines just the same. They need thinned out, and not just so someone can make money at it. About 10 years ago or so, coons dropped from 25 bucks one year to around 8 bucks. A huge number of trappers and coon hunters quit going, as they were spoiled by the high dollars from the previous year. For a while I was releasing all the medium and small coons that year, until I talked with a biologist from DNR. He got on me for not thinning the population down. Serious predation on ground-nesting birds and disease were the reasons they extended season on many species. He told me to shoot them and let them lay.... NOT to release them. Coon harvests in the 70's and 80's were about 350,000 per year in Illinois (trapping and hunting). When prices crashed in '87, the harvest dropped to about 70,000. Of course that is a reason we (WCO's) are so busy, but with a limited harvest comes detrimental consequences (to a variety of species). I've caught 300 to 400 muskrats per year (fur trapping) when they were less than 2 bucks. Didn't care. I love doing it, and it DOES NOT hurt the numbers if habitat is available. I'm out trapping every day right now, and prices are poor. 6 bucks for coons (on carcass), 6 for rats, 8 for mink, 8 to 10 for beavers. No way I'm going to break even, but I'll keep going anyway. I can turn off my WCO mentality when fur trapping. Just as I turn off my fur trapping mindset when doing commercial wildlife control. I trap animals and solve animal problems all year long for a living, and my "weekend" is December and January. So to "relax" after catching animals all spring, summer and fall, I go catch animals.... but on a different level. Don't have to "catch them all" at any site. Can go where I want, when I want. And helping landowners by being part of the "old school" trapping tradition. I sell my catch on carcass to a local fur buyer who has a contract with with a pet food company in St. Louis. Nothing is wasted. And it makes me feel great when an anti-trapper (while holding their little dog that is "part of the family") tells me they hate trapping (and yes, trappers). I simply let them know their little fur ball eats the meat and by-products from the critters I catch.... then they don't know what to say. Getting off-topic.... but fur trapping is such a tradition in so many areas that the die-hard guys would be doing it even if the animals had NO value (myself included). To view every aspect of interacting with Nature and wildlife through an economic standpoint seems a bit narrow-minded. Just sayin'. BTW.... Was a state trapper education instructor for 15 years, and still constantly take kids (and adults) out trapping to introduce them to the activity.
Ron Scheller
|
|
|
Re: Would Trapper Talk Be Better For This?
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#4792116
12/11/14 11:01 PM
12/11/14 11:01 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
St. Louis area
Dave Schmidt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Apr 2010
St. Louis area
|
Ron, those little furballs are probably being fed a "vegetarian dog food" (isn't that what Ellen DeGeneres sells?).
ALL OUT Wildlife Control
|
|
|
|
|