Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: beaver trapper]
#5219441
10/05/15 05:37 PM
10/05/15 05:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Northern Nevada
Bob
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Northern Nevada
|
It's not about damage to the coyote. It's about damage to smaller non target critters. A house cat can't take a #3 like a coyote can. That's where the smaller traps come into play
"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: beaver trapper]
#5219456
10/05/15 06:03 PM
10/05/15 06:03 PM
|
Mark June
Unregistered
|
Mark June
Unregistered
|
With smaller traps, it takes a bit of expertise to guide the paw to the pan (fencing) vs. having a bigger target and hoping that the paw lands square. I sold all my 1.75/2/3's at the NTA in Marshfield a few years abck as they are obsolete compared to new trap designs. That being said, I don't like working on traps so these were stock models with beefier swivels and chain and night latched but no lamination. If you're hoping that the animal's paw will land square, use a #78 
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: Bob]
#5219894
10/05/15 09:54 PM
10/05/15 09:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Middle Tennessee
TNcat
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2013
Middle Tennessee
|
It's not about damage to the coyote. It's about damage to smaller non target critters. A house cat can't take a #3 like a coyote can. That's where the smaller traps come into play Bob - you must have sissy house cats ..lol. 90% of my land are # 3's ..never seen damage!!!
IT'S A SOUTHERN THANG Y'ALL WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND
NRA member
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: Bob]
#5219976
10/05/15 10:30 PM
10/05/15 10:30 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
South metro, MN
Calvin
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2007
South metro, MN
|
It's not about damage to the coyote. It's about damage to smaller non target critters. A house cat can't take a #3 like a coyote can. That's where the smaller traps come into play Theory. I've caught farm cats in the big traps. More damage with the smaller ones by comparison. Of course the particular big trap could be different. Always had more damage in the smaller traps, though. Worse was always the 1.75s.
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: beaver trapper]
#5220061
10/05/15 11:13 PM
10/05/15 11:13 PM
|
Mark June
Unregistered
|
Mark June
Unregistered
|
Smaller trap offer the following advantages;
1. Quicker to set with less bedding required 2. Use less covering such as waxed dirt, etc. means less $$ spent if purchasing covering 3. Easier on the body if you are running dozens of sets every day 4. Less weight in the rig (esp. important in UTV/AtVs. 5. Less weight on the smaller species paw can be beneficial 6. Faster to get into the ground means less human scent left at the set area 7. MUCH easier to use and discuss with land owners in urban America
Just some quick points and there are more. I note also the bigger traps are valuable also and have their place.
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: beaver trapper]
#5220073
10/05/15 11:19 PM
10/05/15 11:19 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Middle Tennessee
TNcat
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2013
Middle Tennessee
|
Bottom line for me, I sold all my MB 550's...I Do not like them . That's all I got to say about that 
Last edited by TNcat; 10/06/15 01:03 PM.
IT'S A SOUTHERN THANG Y'ALL WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND
NRA member
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: beaver trapper]
#5220118
10/06/15 12:05 AM
10/06/15 12:05 AM
|
Mark June
Unregistered
|
Mark June
Unregistered
|
I think the take away here is;
Trappers have opinions based on their individual trapping skills and observations in the field. Both of these criteria vary trapper to trapper so trap preference varies trapper to trapper. That's a good thing. Some like Coke and some prefer Pepsi.
There's really no "right" or "wrong" answer. Buy some of several models and see what your style of trapping click with.
I started trapping with jump traps, moved on to Victor #3N, then to Victor #3's, then to Victor #2 (not very long) then to SC 1.75, now MB 550. There were BMI Wolfer and some high end traps (Jakes, Sterling) used in the west but not in Michigan as theft was too severe (10% stolen each year). All have caught coyotes and some are much better than others and some would be better used in rural settings vs. suburban surroundings.
Aren't we fortunate to be able to discuss several brands of traps and several styles as well. That way each of us can find a good "fit".
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: beaver trapper]
#5220120
10/06/15 12:06 AM
10/06/15 12:06 AM
|
Mark June
Unregistered
|
Mark June
Unregistered
|
When do we get to figure out the best traps for Lions?
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: beaver trapper]
#5220504
10/06/15 11:33 AM
10/06/15 11:33 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Pa
Wright Brothers
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Pa
|
If bigger is more friendly, why then does my state association provide 1 1/2s to the trapper school attendees? Is the whole Association misinformed? lol
So many variables, if on the magic coyote run way yes set big. But, does the newbie asking these questions even know where this location exists? Experienced guys don't need to ask. I'm not about to suggest new trappers, IN MY AREA IN THE EAST, start big.
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: ]
#5220508
10/06/15 11:36 AM
10/06/15 11:36 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2014
SE MN
2cylinder
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2014
SE MN
|
When do we get to figure out the best traps for Lions? #1 longspring
Rebuilding john deere and international/farmall carburetors
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: beaver trapper]
#5220574
10/06/15 01:10 PM
10/06/15 01:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Northern Nevada
Bob
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Northern Nevada
|
Ever caught a kit fox in a #3? It ain't pretty, not a bit. I'm not saying a # 3 isn't more appropriate for coyotes. I'm saying that a lot of the time coyotes aren't all you gotta worry about.
Last edited by Bob; 10/06/15 01:28 PM.
"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: beaver trapper]
#5220576
10/06/15 01:13 PM
10/06/15 01:13 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2014
SE MN
2cylinder
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2014
SE MN
|
Beaver trapper, did you ever decide on a trap?
Rebuilding john deere and international/farmall carburetors
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: Bob]
#5220824
10/06/15 05:33 PM
10/06/15 05:33 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
South metro, MN
Calvin
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2007
South metro, MN
|
Ever caught a kit fox in a #3? It ain't pretty, not a bit. I'm not saying a # 3 isn't more appropriate for coyotes. I'm saying that a lot of the time coyotes aren't all you gotta worry about. It depends on what #3, Bob. Of course they run the spectrum. I trap in suburbia...with 650 casts because the 550s beat the non targets up too much. I keep some 2 coil Victor #3 padded jaws for places of extra concern. Just my experience. To each his own.
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: beaver trapper]
#5220977
10/06/15 07:32 PM
10/06/15 07:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Northern Nevada
Bob
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Northern Nevada
|
Calvin, I'm talking kit fox, not reds or greys. Out here we have swift fox, they're protected, but nearly the same thing as a kit fox. Where I grew up we had kit fox. I've caught them in fully modified bridger #3s and they cause devastating damage. There is no chance of release when a kit or swift fox is caught in a #3. There's no recovering from that for them, their legs are very fragile.
"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: beaver trapper]
#5221108
10/06/15 08:48 PM
10/06/15 08:48 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Hillsboro Ohio
Jeffrey D Norris
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2012
Hillsboro Ohio
|
Guys, I don't think that a half an inch of jaw width is going to gain a whole lot on the catch gain...I think a lot of the strong traps have a greater jaw pressure... Has anyone ever tested the pressure of grip each trap has ??? I like the softcatch trap for a couple reasons... 1st thing is a broken leg will twist off pretty easy (softcatch is a little easier on the leg)... 2nd is I will be trying to sell live this year... and the rubber jaw also has a greater holding area ... I guess there are a lot of choices out there like several have posted... That is my take on trap selection use what catches for you and forget what don't
I caught 1 low down dirty rat
|
|
|
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3
[Re: beaver trapper]
#5221219
10/06/15 10:05 PM
10/06/15 10:05 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2014
montana
red mt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2014
montana
|
Lack of Swivels is the cause not the traps , power is not the issue. In 3 traps listed.
Kenneth schoening
|
|
|
|
|