Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Kyfarmer]
#5572435
07/07/16 11:25 AM
07/07/16 11:25 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 22,684 St. Louis Co, Mo
BigBob
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 22,684
St. Louis Co, Mo
|
Try saying: "You have a choice, put down or re-locate at an additional cost".
Every kid needs a Dog and a Curmudgeon.
Remember Bowe Bergdahl, the traitor.
Beware! Jill Pudlewski, Ron Oates and Keven Begesse are liars and thiefs!
|
|
|
Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Kyfarmer]
#5572447
07/07/16 11:37 AM
07/07/16 11:37 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,996 NC, Person Co.
QuietButDeadly
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,996
NC, Person Co.
|
What do your laws say about relocation? In NC, we can not relocate. We can only release on the same property where caught or dispatch.
If relocation is legal, it still is not necessarily a good idea. Critters are territorial and the relocated critter will end up having to fight for his survival in a new location anyway. Many times the relocated critter winds up dead anyway. Relocation can also spread disease to otherwise healthy populations.
Your clients typically do not have a clue what happens in nature. Sometimes a good explanation helps them accept reality. If not, let them continue to deal with the problem. When it gets bad enough, their attitude will change.
Ever had anyone refuse to allow the skunk under their house to be removed because it would be dispatched?
Life Member: NCTA, VTA, NTA, TTFHA, MFTI Member: FTA
|
|
|
Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Kyfarmer]
#5572529
07/07/16 01:28 PM
07/07/16 01:28 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,341 East Ohio
Jeff
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,341
East Ohio
|
I keep it very simple here when they ask. I tell them I follow the rules that are set by the State of Ohio.
Retired, Moving South
|
|
|
Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Kyfarmer]
#5572792
07/07/16 05:55 PM
07/07/16 05:55 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 843 NH
sgs
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 843
NH
|
As long as relocation is legal and you are not personally opposed to it, add it to your list of services and charge appropriately. Ever had anyone refuse to allow the skunk under their house to be removed because it would be dispatched? Yes, I have.
|
|
|
Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Kyfarmer]
#5573929
07/08/16 05:07 PM
07/08/16 05:07 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 22,684 St. Louis Co, Mo
BigBob
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 22,684
St. Louis Co, Mo
|
(I intended these to be suggestions for talking points for the customer to decide what they want)
Spreads disease Animals dumped with no idea of dangers, where to find food/water, shelter Animals are territorial, will likely have to fight for anything Screws up the Bio-diversity, but can give a boost to it as well
Last edited by BigBob; 07/10/16 05:18 PM.
Every kid needs a Dog and a Curmudgeon.
Remember Bowe Bergdahl, the traitor.
Beware! Jill Pudlewski, Ron Oates and Keven Begesse are liars and thiefs!
|
|
|
Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Kyfarmer]
#5574383
07/08/16 11:39 PM
07/08/16 11:39 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,361 mequon, wisconsin
Paul Winkelmann
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,361
mequon, wisconsin
|
C,mon Big Bob, Animals with obvious disease wind up in the dumpster. If relocation spread disease we would have been out of business years ago instead of adding more help! If any animal is too dumb to find food and water, he will become food for some other animal which is what happens in nature and you know it. Animals are territorial in town. Out here in the country they need only move down a few blocks. Universities have collared raccoons and some have traveled nearly 10 miles before settling down. All these scarred up animals from fighting are a figment of somebody's imagination. We have at least 24 new species of animals and birds in our area that were no where to be found when I was a kid. No beaver, coyote, red squirrels, flying squirrels, otter, just to name a few. How's that for bio -diversity?
|
|
|
Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#5574589
07/09/16 09:30 AM
07/09/16 09:30 AM
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,828 Southwest Michigan
Michigan Trappin
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,828
Southwest Michigan
|
C,mon Big Bob, Animals with obvious disease wind up in the dumpster. If relocation spread disease we would have been out of business years ago instead of adding more help! If any animal is too dumb to find food and water, he will become food for some other animal which is what happens in nature and you know it. Animals are territorial in town. Out here in the country they need only move down a few blocks. Universities have collared raccoons and some have traveled nearly 10 miles before settling down. All these scarred up animals from fighting are a figment of somebody's imagination. We have at least 24 new species of animals and birds in our area that were no where to be found when I was a kid. No beaver, coyote, red squirrels, flying squirrels, otter, just to name a few. How's that for bio -diversity? Spot on ^^^^ If spread of disease is really that easily done. Then it would be out of control as so many homeowners capture animals themselves and take them to the local state land or dead end country road and release them
Every day is a gift from GOD, don't waste it!!
If they have plenty of food, give them something interesting to smell
|
|
|
Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Kyfarmer]
#5575017
07/09/16 04:07 PM
07/09/16 04:07 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 22,684 St. Louis Co, Mo
BigBob
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 22,684
St. Louis Co, Mo
|
Sure, the obviously sick ones are/should be killed, BUT, Rabies, Distemper, Parvo, etc, all have an incubation period. Which is why many states prohibit transport release, and many others discourage it. Right now in Mo we several tree diseases that are spreading rapidly and the state is asking folks to not transport firewood any distance. All kinds of vermin are being transported to the US by international shipping. CWD, Hemoragic Fever are rampant in some places, bad enough that some areas are being scoured and all deer killed.
Every kid needs a Dog and a Curmudgeon.
Remember Bowe Bergdahl, the traitor.
Beware! Jill Pudlewski, Ron Oates and Keven Begesse are liars and thiefs!
|
|
|
Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Kyfarmer]
#5576008
07/10/16 06:24 PM
07/10/16 06:24 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 843 NH
sgs
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 843
NH
|
Why does this always come up? You do what your state requires of you or you break the law and maybe lose your right to do nuisance work. The why of it does not matter, the state determines the why. Kurt, this comes up because it's an issue that we all have to face. Many states do allow relocation and for those of us who live in those state, we have to decide whether to offer that service. Just because a state allows it, doesn't mean you have to offer it as a service. Decisions have to be made and thought is required. And more to the point, as the op has experienced, there is a market for relocation. You can turn away those customers if you want but for many it is something to consider.
|
|
|
Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#5576695
07/11/16 11:45 AM
07/11/16 11:45 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 188 California
Throw Back
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 188
California
|
C,mon Big Bob, Animals with obvious disease wind up in the dumpster. If relocation spread disease we would have been out of business years ago instead of adding more help! If any animal is too dumb to find food and water, he will become food for some other animal which is what happens in nature and you know it. Animals are territorial in town. Out here in the country they need only move down a few blocks. Universities have collared raccoons and some have traveled nearly 10 miles before settling down. All these scarred up animals from fighting are a figment of somebody's imagination. We have at least 24 new species of animals and birds in our area that were no where to be found when I was a kid. No beaver, coyote, red squirrels, flying squirrels, otter, just to name a few. How's that for bio -diversity? Paul, thats simply not true. Can you tell a raccoon that has roundworm on first look? DO you examine the poop of every coon? Spreading disease doesnt mean fatality for all animals in an area, it means an infected population. Yes that animal may find food or water, but if you relocate 20 raccoons to an area, and the all die within six month due to stupidity it may not seem like a big deal, but what if each of them eats an additional 6 quail nest in the area, resulting in the loss of over 1000 eggs? The displacement for local wildlife is a real concern. Your rise in animal species is dependant on way more than just reloction and is a much bigger picture to look at, but it does not mean relocation does not have a negative impact when done improperly. Sure, things alway will balance themselves out, but that doesnt mean we should just do whatever we want.
|
|
|
Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Throw Back]
#5577720
07/12/16 10:55 AM
07/12/16 10:55 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,361 mequon, wisconsin
Paul Winkelmann
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,361
mequon, wisconsin
|
Look, my answer was only for those of you that have a choice. If your state says you can't relocate, argue with them, not me. I'm really tired of people who have never relocated an animal telling me that I don't know what I'm doing. Some of this stuff is moronic. You don't kill a raccoon because he has round worms; I'm sure most of them do. I am not saying that relocation adds to the population, but it certainly doesn't damage it! Illinois has to kill everything and their population is booming just like ours. What I'm saying is that I find proper relocation saves me time, money, and a clear conscience! When we tell people we relocate, we do!
|
|
|
Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Kyfarmer]
#5577767
07/12/16 12:25 PM
07/12/16 12:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,191 Mt. Olive, IL
Ron Scheller
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,191
Mt. Olive, IL
|
The only two animals we can not relocate are coons and skunks. All skunks must be euthanized as they are a rabies vector (that's the rub from DNR). Coons due to the extremely high numbers and associated negative aspects of high numbers (disease, predation, etc).
Technically, coons can be released on the same property where captured within 100 yards of where caught, but that situation rarely arises. One such scenario would be when there is a female with kits in a fireplace damper. Chase the female up the chimney into a chimney trap, reach in and remove the kits. Place them in a box or somewhere outside, and release the female after installing a chimney cap. But that coon will usually take those kits into another home nearby, and eventually leads to a situation where they end up being put down.
We can relocate squirrels, groundhogs, chipmunks, opossums, and basically all of the critters covered under the nuisance regs. Of course we (or I) use lethal traps for muskrats and beavers, as no one wants to pay the extra cost for trapping alive, and it's impossible to find a landowner who will allow them them to be released on their property! Can't release ANY wildlife on public ground of any type.
I run into a couple people each year who refuse to have me take care of the raccoons in their attic or walls as they don't want them killed. No problem with me, there are plenty of people who actually understand the regs and also understand their home is more valuable than the life of a raccoon.
On the flip side.... I never use lethal traps for squirrels (grays 90%) as I find it far more effective to trap them with small cage traps. We can use lethal traps for them, but it's not as effective (time-wise). I have several landowners who allow me to release squirrels on their properties.
I never beat around the bush when people ask me what I do with raccoons or skunks. I share that info on the initial phone call, as it can save you a trip when you arrive and the wife throws a tantrum when you tell them as you're setting up the job.
Ron Scheller
|
|
|
Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Ron Scheller]
#5577854
07/12/16 02:03 PM
07/12/16 02:03 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,361 mequon, wisconsin
Paul Winkelmann
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,361
mequon, wisconsin
|
Now that was an intelligent post. Ron and I see eye to eye on many things and using live traps for squirrels is just one of many. And the only time I would use cages for muskrats is when it saves me time. You also need to remember that we have a built-in disease eliminator in Wisconsin. It's called winter and it should start any day now! P.S. I did not know about raccoons and skunks being the only non-relocation animals. Thanks for setting me straight, Ron.
Last edited by Paul Winkelmann; 07/12/16 02:06 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Relocate or euthanize
[Re: Kyfarmer]
#5577968
07/12/16 03:25 PM
07/12/16 03:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,191 Mt. Olive, IL
Ron Scheller
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,191
Mt. Olive, IL
|
I find it interesting how operators in various parts of Illinois handle things. There's no doubt about it, taking a woodchuck our minimum distance of 10 miles and opening the door (at an approved release site) is much easier than euthanizing/shooting and then burying it. Same for squirrels, even though they require a smaller grave!
It's important to consider location, however. 90% of my travels are through rural areas (between cities and towns), many of which I know multiple landowners. My ability to obtain release sites is much easier than others. One of the WCO's in Chicago has two prices for squirrels. One, quite reasonable, is for lethal trapping (using conis). For capturing alive (cage traps) the cost is about 4 times a high. In Chicago and most of Cook County, there are no privately owned properties with suitable habitat for relocation. They would have to drive an hour just to reach a decent area to release. That adds up quick, cost of fuel and travel time.
Fortunately for me, during my daily travels I constantly pass places I have permission for releasing critters, so I don't have any additional costs for relocation. As long as we take them between 10 and 40 miles, we're good to go.
Ron Scheller
|
|
|
|
|