No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter
Unless you show what they were talking about, nothing but a liberal sound bite.
They were talking about someone who was already declared mentally ill by a doctor.
Quote:
Vice President Mike Pence: Violence, restraining orders, California has a version of this. And I think in your meeting with governors earlier this week, individually, and as a group, we spoke about the states taking steps. But the focus is to literally give families and give local law enforcement additional tools if an individual is reported to be a potential danger to themselves or others. Allow due process so no one’s rights are trampled but the ability to go to court, obtain an order and collect not only the firearms but any weapons in the possession.
President Trump: Or, Mike, take the firearms first and then go to court. Because that’s another system. A lot of times by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process procedures. I like taking the guns early. Like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida. He had a lot of firearms. They saw everything. To go to court would have taken a long time. You could do exactly what you’re saying but take the guns first, go through due process second.
U libs r right that Trump doesn't act like prior presidents. That is why he got elected. We r tired of the same old crap. The man is not a seasoned politician and that is why he is there-he is cleaning out the mess left by the prior presidents. He just keeps those D's guessing what's gonna happen next. Even though he's been hittin some speed bumps he's doin what we put him there to do! 5 stars yet!
So conservatives disliked their own elected officials so much they voted in the class clown to straighten things out??? My old man would have said you cut off your nose to spit your face..
So your ok with him knocking on your door. Taking your guns because you said something to someone.. then government folks deciding if you meet their idea of nuts or not??? Cops couldn't find time to run the list of folks that could end up with them knocking on your door..Probably some of us on this post.
Mac
"Never Forget Which Way Is Up"
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174175 03/01/1811:25 AM03/01/1811:25 AM
Yep BBB, they were talking about people who already have problems. Here in Pa. and i'm sure most states, you can't have a weapon if you have a restraining order against you. What Trump was saying, Refering to Pences statement about such people, no need to go to court again to take the weapons.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174176 03/01/1811:25 AM03/01/1811:25 AM
If you left your trapperman account open and someone with nefarious intent posted what you just wrote, under your name and account, you'd be fine having your weapons seized with no due process?
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: bblwi]
#6174209 03/01/1811:50 AM03/01/1811:50 AM
Asking for forgiveness instead of permission is a common term used when people, groups or agencies want to do something they know is controversial and or not likely to take place, yet in the situation with firearms I guess that is not an appreciated thought process. President Trump to me is a good example of one who under a stiffer mental health code might not be able to own a firearm yet there are millions who would help him reload so he can continue on.
Bryce
I am sure a code can be written to a point none of us can own guns?????? You can make a code any way you want? So yes I am sure under a stiffer mental code no one on trapperman might not be able to own a firearm.
J
Suppression rules/prevention drools
Confidence is going fly fishing for Moby Dick, in a row boat, and bringing tartar sauce with you.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174210 03/01/1811:51 AM03/01/1811:51 AM
Yes. If you leave your account open and someone sends death threats you're going to have to deal with it. Don't leave your accounts open where nefarious people have access. Would you knowingly leave your wallet at the mall and think it's not your fault someone used your CC card?
Last edited by Jonnytrapper; 03/01/1811:51 AM.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: FlyinFinn]
#6174211 03/01/1811:52 AM03/01/1811:52 AM
If you left your trapperman account open and someone with nefarious intent posted what you just wrote, under your name and account, you'd be fine having your weapons seized with no due process?
Exactly, and no; not cool with that at all.
Jeex around a firehouse people leave their accounts open all the time, would be nothing to post some foolishness on there and cause all kindsa issues.
J
Suppression rules/prevention drools
Confidence is going fly fishing for Moby Dick, in a row boat, and bringing tartar sauce with you.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: hippie]
#6174213 03/01/1811:53 AM03/01/1811:53 AM
Yep BBB, they were talking about people who already have problems. Here in Pa. and i'm sure most states, you can't have a weapon if you have a restraining order against you. What Trump was saying, Refering to Pences statement about such people, no need to go to court again to take the weapons.
Yes. If you leave your account open and someone sends death threats you're going to have to deal with it. Don't leave your accounts open where nefarious people have access. Would you knowingly leave your wallet at the mall and think it's not your fault someone used your CC card?
Nefarious? while I dont think a crew mate would go so far, I do know you leave your account open it will came back writtne in japanese as your main language.
And again, no - not cool with it at all.
Hitler, Stalin, democrats (gestapo) all start by taking guns away without due process.
Suppression rules/prevention drools
Confidence is going fly fishing for Moby Dick, in a row boat, and bringing tartar sauce with you.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: hippie]
#6174219 03/01/1811:57 AM03/01/1811:57 AM
For the first time we are getting to see what normally happened behind closed doors, thanks to Trump.
You liberals here wetting yourselfs, could you amagine what Obama or Clinton may have said about guns when we couldn't hear them?
Bet you'd change your tune about being a supporting Democrat if we could've!
Your never going to have closed door meetings with both sides present without threat of imprisonement. One or both will sprint to the first microphone decrying what the nasty other side presented. Unless both sides don't want the public to find out.
Which is worse, a gun grabber who tells you to your face that his intent is to take them, or those that allow and support undercutting the Constitution all while telling you they support the 2nd amendment?
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: JakeDog]
#6174224 03/01/1811:59 AM03/01/1811:59 AM
Yes. If you leave your account open and someone sends death threats you're going to have to deal with it. Don't leave your accounts open where nefarious people have access. Would you knowingly leave your wallet at the mall and think it's not your fault someone used your CC card?
Nefarious? while I dont think a crew mate would go so far, I do know you leave your account open it will came back writtne in japanese as your main language.
And again, no - not cool with it at all.
Hitler, Stalin, democrats (gestapo) all start by taking guns away without due process.
I'm got talking about permanently or without probably cause.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: SNIPERBBB]
#6174252 03/01/1812:23 PM03/01/1812:23 PM
For the first time we are getting to see what normally happened behind closed doors, thanks to Trump.
You liberals here wetting yourselfs, could you amagine what Obama or Clinton may have said about guns when we couldn't hear them?
Bet you'd change your tune about being a supporting Democrat if we could've!
Your never going to have closed door meetings with both sides present without threat of imprisonement. One or both will sprint to the first microphone decrying what the nasty other side presented. Unless both sides don't want the public to find out.
You can go there if you want, but i'm sure most understood what i said, you included.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174259 03/01/1812:32 PM03/01/1812:32 PM
I doubt that. Your claiming that cameras are always rolling for public consumption everytime Trump meets with someone. That's absurd in the extreme and very stupid if it was.