Re: Social Security
[Re: Bigbuck]
#6433263
01/19/19 02:11 AM
01/19/19 02:11 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,153 Armpit, ak
Dirt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,153
Armpit, ak
|
The best I can tell from your post Bryce is that you claim barter is exempt from income tax and ssi. Not true according to the IRS.
Who is John Galt?
|
|
|
Re: Social Security
[Re: Bigbuck]
#6433272
01/19/19 02:36 AM
01/19/19 02:36 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,088 Magna, Utah
GritGuy
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,088
Magna, Utah
|
I don't understand why one would not want to receive their invested earnings they paid into SS when they are of the age to do so. That's like just giving your hard earned money to the ducks on the street !
You also do understand that while waiting your turn to receive your earnings you were paying into it for some one else to receive their's, that's they way the program is set up to run.
It's basically a typical insurance lottery that bets against how much they have to pay due to your health and age when your able to receive it. But it has millions of people legally tied into it by law. So it's slanted to the insurance company of course by shear numbers.
People who try to get out of paying into it usually are those who feel they are not free, LOL and are being rode by the government into the ground, they really never improve their life and stay the same, however it was set up this way for some sort of funds to have to help feed one, not to live on, the same way your tax's are taken out for the IRS as if we were to do it on our own, every one knows that just would not happen. Pretty soon there would be so many home auctions on the blocks of this country due to seizure and liens that everything would collapse, it might any way,who knows.
It needs changes, and some work, however until it does become almost insolvent, as it is close to now, with out congress not having to have it them selves, there is not much incentive for congress to move it to the fore front for the rest of us !
![[Linked Image]](http://banners.wunderground.com/weathersticker/miniDial_both/language/www/US/UT/Magna.gif) Sorry if my opinions or replies offend you, they are not meant to !
|
|
|
Re: Social Security
[Re: Bigbuck]
#6433342
01/19/19 08:35 AM
01/19/19 08:35 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 32,055 williamsburg ks
danny clifton
"Grumpy Old Man"
|
"Grumpy Old Man"
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 32,055
williamsburg ks
|
s.s. food stamps and farm welfare all come from the same general fund and deficit spending. yet for some reason it is always s.s. running out of money and not the other welfare progtrams
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
|
|
|
Re: Social Security
[Re: danny clifton]
#6433363
01/19/19 09:03 AM
01/19/19 09:03 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 546 Worthington, IN
Scott T
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 546
Worthington, IN
|
s.s. food stamps and farm welfare all come from the same general fund and deficit spending. yet for some reason it is always s.s. running out of money and not the other welfare progtrams It wouldn't surprise me if they take ss before true welfare. We will probably be a socialist country before I retire anyway. (This word is unacceptable on Trapperman)
Looks like he needs another year;-)
|
|
|
Re: Social Security
[Re: Bigbuck]
#6433377
01/19/19 09:18 AM
01/19/19 09:18 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 32,055 williamsburg ks
danny clifton
"Grumpy Old Man"
|
"Grumpy Old Man"
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 32,055
williamsburg ks
|
We have been a socialist country since Franklin Delanore Roosevelt announced his New Deal.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
|
|
|
Re: Social Security
[Re: white marlin]
#6433383
01/19/19 09:26 AM
01/19/19 09:26 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,145 east central WI
Dirty D
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,145
east central WI
|
You are wrong according to the link. They are including what your employer paid in. So you have to at a min. double the 13.1 years which means that it will take a min. of 26.2 years to get back what YOU paid in. What your employer pays in comes out of his pocket, not yours. So your employer is really getting screwed over, he not only pays more than half of your SS but all of his employees. They are the biggest looser in SS. Of course there are way more employees than employers so that's why its setup that way.
|
|
|
Re: Social Security
[Re: Bigbuck]
#6433386
01/19/19 09:30 AM
01/19/19 09:30 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 32,055 williamsburg ks
danny clifton
"Grumpy Old Man"
|
"Grumpy Old Man"
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 32,055
williamsburg ks
|
your employer does pay half but the employee is still earning it. how could anybody stay in business if they didn't include ss in the cost of an employee? I bet your only driving cost is gas too?
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
|
|
|
Re: Social Security
[Re: danny clifton]
#6433406
01/19/19 09:51 AM
01/19/19 09:51 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,145 east central WI
Dirty D
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,145
east central WI
|
your employer does pay half but the employee is still earning it. how could anybody stay in business if they didn't include ss in the cost of an employee? I bet your only driving cost is gas too? How is the employee earning it? He is not, the only thing the employee earns is what is agreed upon as a wage for working for the employer. Try hiring someone and taking both halves of the total SS out of employees paycheck. I'll bet you I know what would happen when the Gov't finds out. Yes, the employer has to cover the cost of paying employer 1/2 of SS, but that cost comes out of what he has to charge his customers. He raises the cost of his goods to cover it. Just like he has to charge more to cover Business insurance, Workmans Comp, and all other costs along the way before he can get a dime back from sales.
|
|
|
Re: Social Security
[Re: Dirty D]
#6433429
01/19/19 10:17 AM
01/19/19 10:17 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,637 MN
walleye101
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,637
MN
|
your employer does pay half but the employee is still earning it. how could anybody stay in business if they didn't include ss in the cost of an employee? I bet your only driving cost is gas too? How is the employee earning it? He is not, the only thing the employee earns is what is agreed upon as a wage for working for the employer. Try hiring someone and taking both halves of the total SS out of employees paycheck. I'll bet you I know what would happen when the Gov't finds out. Yes, the employer has to cover the cost of paying employer 1/2 of SS, but that cost comes out of what he has to charge his customers. He raises the cost of his goods to cover it. Just like he has to charge more to cover Business insurance, Workmans Comp, and all other costs along the way before he can get a dime back from sales. Not really Dirty D An employer does not raise the cost of his goods everytime he hires an employee. He know exactly what it costs per employee including all of the fringe you mentioned. If the projected value of the additional added production does not exceed the cost of the additional employee the hire does not happen. In the private sector if you're not earning it, salary + fringe, you won't be employed long.
Last edited by walleye101; 01/19/19 10:18 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Social Security
[Re: Rat Masterson]
#6433450
01/19/19 10:27 AM
01/19/19 10:27 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,637 MN
walleye101
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,637
MN
|
Dirty D nailed it, I paid in SS for 26 years for my employees matching the 6.2 % they paid in, cost of doing business. But would your business have lasted 26 years if the employees were costing 6.2% more than there employment was adding to the bottom line?
|
|
|
Re: Social Security
[Re: hudsonfur]
#6433458
01/19/19 10:35 AM
01/19/19 10:35 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,683 PA
gryhkl
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,683
PA
|
What party just banned bump stocks? REPUBLICAN To party-first folks it doesn't matter what is done, it only matters which side does it.
|
|
|
|
|