Nor Do I.

But neither do I shy away from pointing out this company's

unethical business practices when they put the Mink Rancher's

financial Interests far ahead of the Wild Fur Trapper's well being.

Two or more competing Auction Houses are a good thing

along with Independent, In-country fur buyers.

We need all these for a thriving, healthy fur industry.

NAFA put themselves in this situation,

and have no one to blame but themselves.

w

Is that an unethical business practice,,or just a business decision?I do agree that they put the mink ranchers ahead of the fur trappers,,and while I didn't like it,,they are a business to make money.And at the time,,they thought that was the right way to go??

It certainly could be both, upstate.

But there have undeniably too many been circumstances

over the years where wild fur trappers have been held out to dry

by NAFA with little to no representation for Us supposed

company owners by Our WFSC reps.

A business decision to make money for their company is one thing,

but The pendulum as swung so far in the direction of the mink rancher's

that it has possibly made NAFA so financially Insolvent

that they will drag "we" wild fur trappers down with them.

w

Well,I hope not for us.I agree with you about when they catered to the mink ranchers rather than the trappers.Come back to bite them and us I suppose.

man,you'd think it was your birthday or somethin.

KUMBAYA !!!!!

w

Ain't worried, they'll get my fur again this year.

So how did nafa cater to the mink ranchers? Or are you guys just pulling that out your rear ends because it sounds good. Seems to me the mink ranchers have the worst market since like ever.

:D,good one

You do have to ask the question, how could they possibly screw this up. How many ranch mink do they sell in a season? 10 million? 10mill at $25, times 18 percent commission is $45 million plus don’t Nafa do most of not all the handling?

But trappers did not destroy your market

Good grief! There are still people that don't know that nafa helped finance this debacle? Wow.

I know that, you know that, heck everybody knows that.

That's a pretty big stretch if your referring to feed loans.

Please contact NAFA directly relative to this matter with your information:

1. Trapper Name
2. Account Number
3. Cheque Number
4. NSF fees, if applicable.

The situation will be rectified.

Well, hopefully NAFA will rethink their misguided and divisive Vision 2020 fur registration project.

I think the checks are certifiable, sustainable, and traceable.

Have to admit the timing is exemplary

I would think by now NAFA should have a grasp on the check numbers that are bad and be reaching out to those shippers. Yet it appears to be the shippers duty to respond if they want reimbursed!
And still no public announcement or acceptance of the inconvenience.