Strictly Trapping


No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers *** No Politics
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Trading Post
(Please support F&T Trading Post, our sponsor for the Trapping Only Forum)



TrappersPost
Please support Trappers post, a sponsor of the Strictly Trapping Forum



Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
280 vs 330 #6856194
04/26/20 10:13 PM
04/26/20 10:13 PM
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 17
MI
A
AdamR90 Offline OP
trapper
AdamR90  Offline OP
trapper
A

Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 17
MI
I am a newer trapper that has started to do more beaver trapping and would like to purchase more beaver traps. The 280’s are cheaper so I can buy more for the same price as I can 330’s.

Is there a large advantage to going with a 330 vs 280? What are some advantages/disadvantages?

Thank you!

Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856201
04/26/20 10:22 PM
04/26/20 10:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,488
james bay frontierOnt.
B
Boco Offline
trapper
Boco  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,488
james bay frontierOnt.
A 330 is a beaver trap.


Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856297
04/26/20 11:56 PM
04/26/20 11:56 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 5,509
West Central MN
20scout Offline
trapper
20scout  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 5,509
West Central MN
Spend the money on the 330's.


Common sense is a not a vegetable that does well in everyone's garden.
Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856305
04/27/20 12:13 AM
04/27/20 12:13 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,794
100 Mile House, BC Can
bctomcat Offline
trapper
bctomcat  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,794
100 Mile House, BC Can
The 280 is also a decent beaver trap and a much better humane trap for otter which are quite often associated with beaver waterways. The 280 will also capture more rats and mink that often spring 330's without getting caught. If limited in funds I would suggest purchasing 280's to begin with.

Last edited by bctomcat; 04/27/20 12:17 AM.

The only constant in trapping is change so keep learning.






Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: Boco] #6856314
04/27/20 12:50 AM
04/27/20 12:50 AM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 948
Indiana
H
Huntall76 Offline
trapper
Huntall76  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 948
Indiana
Originally Posted by Boco
A 330 is a beaver trap.



Listen to this guy ,, he's caught a few beaver in his life

Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856407
04/27/20 07:32 AM
04/27/20 07:32 AM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,738
Iowa
C
coydog2 Offline
trapper
coydog2  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,738
Iowa
I have some 280 ,I do not use them much on beaver , I use mainly 330 on them and works on otter and also get some rats. That is when set for beaver or otter with the 330 .


Life member of DAV,NTA,NRA,ITA.Also member of FTA,CBA
Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856421
04/27/20 07:52 AM
04/27/20 07:52 AM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,446
Houghton Lake, MI
strike2x Offline
trapper
strike2x  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,446
Houghton Lake, MI
I see this kind of topic for coyote traps where preference can come into play but I believe the 330 is a beaver trap and the only question might be what brand. That is where preference comes in.


Wish I had more time to trap....
Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856501
04/27/20 09:42 AM
04/27/20 09:42 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,173
Rochester, MN
Teacher Online content
trapper
Teacher  Online Content
trapper

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,173
Rochester, MN
I’ve used 280s for a number of years and found them more than adequate for beaver. Also make an excellent otter trap. But the 330 has its place too. The 330 fills runs better—much better. And the majority of bigger runs and scent mounds get 330s.


Never too old to learn
Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856517
04/27/20 10:00 AM
04/27/20 10:00 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,830
Wisconsin
T
The Beav Offline
trapper
The Beav  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,830
Wisconsin
The Duke 330 Is a great beaver trap and It won't cost you a arm and a leg to buy a dozen. And they offer free shipping.


The forum Know It All according to Muskrat
Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856536
04/27/20 10:25 AM
04/27/20 10:25 AM
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 697
Ontario
S
Saskfly Offline
trapper
Saskfly  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 697
Ontario
Use both but grab the 330's first for beaver, mostly because they do cover more area. 280's are my preferred trap at dam breaks because they will catch beaver, otter,mink,rats. caught a 61 lb beaver in a 280 at a dam break this year, not sure if he actually thought he was going to fit through it or was trying to knock it down but the 280 belisile did the job.

If it was me would buy the 280's to have more traps, it will get the job done for you and then roll the extra money from your extra traps into 330's later. More steel = more fur.

Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856618
04/27/20 12:11 PM
04/27/20 12:11 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,882
SE Kentucky
K
kytrapper Offline
trapper
kytrapper  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,882
SE Kentucky
The 280’s are nice if you’re packing them much. I have a couple spots I carry six or eight 280’s instead of four 330’s. They fit in my pack better. I like 330’s otherwise. I like MB 1216’s if close to the vehicle.

Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856640
04/27/20 12:41 PM
04/27/20 12:41 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,469
Idaho
B
bearcat2 Offline
trapper
bearcat2  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,469
Idaho
Never used a 280, but they propably have their places where they would be better. I've caught a couple beaver in a 220 in spots where a 330 wouldn't fit. Usually it is the other way around though, and you are looking for a place narrow enough to fill with a 330. 330 is a great beaver trap, and I've never had a problem with them for otters, but I know a lot of guys prefer 280s for otter. Like I said, I've never used a 280, but if I was limited on funds I would buy the 330s because they fit just about perfectly in beaver runs and I know they work. I've got some Dukes, and they work fine, but be aware they are a rectangular trap rather than square like most other brands. I never use anything but handy sticks to set and brace my 330s so it doesn't matter to me. If I was to try and use them in boxes or on clips like a do some of the small bodygrips though, be aware different brands often have different measurements. I have several brands and generations of 110s, 120s, and 150s. I have to keep my boxes and brackets organized to an extent, because they aren't interchangeable.

Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: The Beav] #6856744
04/27/20 04:08 PM
04/27/20 04:08 PM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 948
Indiana
H
Huntall76 Offline
trapper
Huntall76  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 948
Indiana
Originally Posted by The Beav
The Duke 330 Is a great beaver trap and It won't cost you a arm and a leg to buy a dozen. And they offer free shipping.


Who offers free shipping?

Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856755
04/27/20 04:19 PM
04/27/20 04:19 PM
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,889
NNY
0
080808 Offline
trapper
080808  Offline
trapper
0

Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,889
NNY
Direct from Duke if the total order is at least $100 I believe.

Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856756
04/27/20 04:21 PM
04/27/20 04:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 948
Indiana
H
Huntall76 Offline
trapper
Huntall76  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 948
Indiana
I login to the duke website and it doesn't have anywhere I can see to purchase anything, no cart no nothing.

Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856765
04/27/20 04:37 PM
04/27/20 04:37 PM
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,889
NNY
0
080808 Offline
trapper
080808  Offline
trapper
0

Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,889
NNY
Check out most of the trapping magazines. They advertise real heavy what I said. Phone no. at the bottom of home page. 662 494 6767

Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856767
04/27/20 04:38 PM
04/27/20 04:38 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,488
james bay frontierOnt.
B
Boco Offline
trapper
Boco  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,488
james bay frontierOnt.
A 280 will kill a beaver and is ok if set in certain places conducive to their size.
For example when I go out beaver trapping to set a spur line etc I will grab 12 330's and 2 280's.


Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: Boco] #6856834
04/27/20 05:57 PM
04/27/20 05:57 PM
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 17
MI
A
AdamR90 Offline OP
trapper
AdamR90  Offline OP
trapper
A

Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 17
MI
Thank you everyone. I’m going to lean towards the 330 dukes, maybe the 330 bridger.

Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6856922
04/27/20 07:25 PM
04/27/20 07:25 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 41,843
Northern Maine
Bruce T Offline
trapper
Bruce T  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 41,843
Northern Maine
330's


Nevada bound
Re: 280 vs 330 [Re: AdamR90] #6858617
04/29/20 07:11 PM
04/29/20 07:11 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 674
Arkansas
B
bobcat_trapper Offline
trapper
bobcat_trapper  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 674
Arkansas
Goto the nta convention. I bought new duke 280s for 10.00 for otter. 330 was 12.00 each. Alot cheaper to buy. I seen one guy buy 24 new dz 330s.

Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

Moderated by  Drifter, Wolfdog91 

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1