Catalogs are difficult as they are not books, so that breaks it down to popularity (following) and quality
1) In the 40s and 50s you have a following biggies of Dailey, Butcher, Hawbaker, Rickard, Arnold (Cronk Lynch), Griggs and Lennon
2) then you had others that were breaking out like Nelson, Terry (Mast). Hugh Walker, Lewis, Eckhart. Thompson, Hoffman and Mid West Wolfers (like Leo Hoeft)
3) Then there the supply catalogs like FC Taylor Howe and Mass
4) The 40S is interesting as we were coming out of WWII, and paper war going thru a change along with soldiers/sailors returning to the trapline
5) Victor and Blake catalogs are interesting but more common than you realize.
6) Catalogs do establish some history in trap development/evolution, lure makers and pricing
7) Hawbakers first three years is very collectible with PA trappers
Alot of established collectors have filled their collection and are now starting to break up their collections, new collectors have no idea who Dailey was.....thats how disconnected the market is now.......most young people do not know how to read and think the latest you tuber is the flavor, I have seen where young trappers on the internet have tried to correct Wayne Derrick, Jim Comstock, Mark Zagger and others: they do not have a clue.
So their is no real rare material from the 40s and 50s (except niche material), catalogs will run from 3 to 10 for common and 10 to 20 for better material, Arnolds would be the most expensive. followed by Nelson, Nelson only because OG made him famous with the wolfer collectors. Terry (Mast) for the Wolfers, Dailey and Butcher is about covers.
You are better off looking for a buyer but as you can hold paper for years til you find one willing to pay. I collect early NY fox trappers and Mast/terry; dealers pay 30 to 50 cents on the dollar unless they have a buyer in mind and can hold the paper 3 to 5 years based on shows and want lists.
Henpecked