So in the case of a dirt hole set, what goes on in a coyotes's brain if he sees the set before he smells it? And would his approach to said set be different than if he smelled it first?
Also, does his willingness to approach a blended hole set, as in the case of a mouse hole set differ than a larger gaudy dirt hole, if he smells it first rather than seeing it first?
I guess that depends on how your using the term “approach”.
Personally, I could give two hoots how he approaches a set. To me approaching a set isn’t “working” a set and isn’t getting the coyote caught. A coyote may approach a set, circle, etc. It may dart in and out many times. It may go sit on a mound 20 yards away for a certain amount of time pondering things. I’ve got video of what have to be very submissive coyotes belly crawling in to a set afraid they’ll get their butt kicked. An abundant, competitive coyote population they may just wade right in immediately. But when you use terms like approach, I think of a coyote that can still be several feet back and not caught. I don’t call this a worked set.
When a coyote goes in to actually work the set and get “danger close” so to speak, they want the wind in their favor. They want to lead with their nose.
I used to set a lot of secondary locations along two tracks using the two set mentality.
On the upwind side I’d make a nice flat set. Trap more or less downwind of the backing and smell. Let their nose find that one. On the downwind side I’d make a set with more eye appeal, with the trap usually on the upwind side of the backing and smell so they couldn’t miss the visual cues. Let their eyes find that one.
Guess what sets had the most “misses”? Had more coyotes work the set from the back side? And had more coyotes “approach” but not “work” the set?
They want to “work” the set with their nose.