|
Re: An argument against bounties
[Re: DWC]
#7704920
10/30/22 08:59 PM
10/30/22 08:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2020
Aliceville, Kansas 45
Yukon John
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2020
Aliceville, Kansas 45
|
Maybe for pheasant, but here we had WAY more quail, when we had less crp. Might not be tied together, but true nontheless, in my eyes.
Act like a blank, get treated like a blank. Insert your own blank!
|
|
|
Re: An argument against bounties
[Re: MattLA]
#7704936
10/30/22 09:27 PM
10/30/22 09:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Yes sir
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
|
All it takes is for a person to see a large property, where nature has been given the ability to self regulate. It blows a lot of theories to pieces and really shows just how bad humans are at "managing" animal numbers. As a whole nature doesn't " regulate". It cycles from one one extreme to the other. You almost sound like guys that are against us hunters and trappers.
|
|
|
Re: An argument against bounties
[Re: DWC]
#7704976
10/30/22 10:10 PM
10/30/22 10:10 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2014
montana
red mt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2014
montana
|
Let me offer a different opinion it may because the program is working,,,, the only way to know for sure is not do the program ,,, and not do the program in a different area and see the results. Here it's collaring wolves I am a believer in collaring wolves because we can kill the whole pack when they kill livestock.... Instead of killing just one At at a time trapping .... Not that I thinking trapping is not adding it's helping I agree,,, but not killing numbers needed imo.... I guess what I am saying drc fwp needs to quit putting a season on something that needs no season mark them as nongame or predator year around killing and be done with it. Save a lot of money all the way around. Instead study costs ,,, plant costs,,, and controll costs,,, and monitor costs just as bounty's cost.... If would would things in there proper perspective we would not need such folly Only reason for a season on a problem critter is money they want there cut (ie) dnrc ,,,,fwp,,, fish game of each state,,, it's not that it needs a season like coyote .... Your kidding me right....lol Good nite Red
Last edited by red mt; 10/30/22 10:39 PM.
Kenneth schoening
|
|
|
Re: An argument against bounties
[Re: Yes sir]
#7705044
10/31/22 05:40 AM
10/31/22 05:40 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2021
Louisiana
MattLA
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2021
Louisiana
|
All it takes is for a person to see a large property, where nature has been given the ability to self regulate. It blows a lot of theories to pieces and really shows just how bad humans are at "managing" animal numbers. As a whole nature doesn't " regulate". It cycles from one one extreme to the other. You almost sound like guys that are against us hunters and trappers. Nature does self regulate, theres a balance for everything. Humans have never done a great job. Red from Montana just proves my point, we already went down that road and killed almost game animal in the USA. The seasons were brought about to prevent extinction, not because some government entity wanted money. The propensity to support x number of species on a certain tract of land depends far more on the actual habitat than animals being trapped on it. Absolutely if you want to have a few years where those populations increase because you want to trap out the natural predators, it will work. The main point is you have to identify what the natural number is that the tract of land can support, and work from there. Yes Sir, thats a sorry reply to somebody who you disagree with, what do you want for approval?
|
|
|
Re: An argument against bounties
[Re: Yes sir]
#7705050
10/31/22 05:57 AM
10/31/22 05:57 AM
|
J Staton
Unregistered
|
J Staton
Unregistered
|
All it takes is for a person to see a large property, where nature has been given the ability to self regulate. It blows a lot of theories to pieces and really shows just how bad humans are at "managing" animal numbers. As a whole nature doesn't " regulate". It cycles from one one extreme to the other. You almost sound like guys that are against us hunters and trappers. Agree. Extreme cycles are nature's regulator. Populations increase past the habitat available and the crash occurs. Coon populations are getting extreme in my area. I expect distemper to run through the population soon. If coon prices were up, distemper wouldn't be such a worry.
|
|
|
Re: An argument against bounties
[Re: DWC]
#7705059
10/31/22 06:19 AM
10/31/22 06:19 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
danny clifton
"Grumpy Old Man"
|
"Grumpy Old Man"
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
|
MattLA I have no clue why your posting on this site. Lurking to see what were up to is one thing. I seriously doubt you will get any converts. No more than I would on a vegan web site. We all know better than to believe the AR propaganda because we see first hand what goes on in the natural world rather than reading what some deluded disney watching urbanite wrote in a PETA news letter.
The number one cause of animal population increase was the invention of the combine. Waste grain on the ground increased by leaps and bounds when combines came on the scene.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
|
|
|
Re: An argument against bounties
[Re: DWC]
#7705095
10/31/22 07:16 AM
10/31/22 07:16 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2015
se South Dakota
NonPCfed
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2015
se South Dakota
|
Ive been against the money spent on South Dakotas roadkill coontail program since it started (in an effort to buy rich landowner donors-this is my opinion of course:)). Went back to Iowa this weekend, in an area no one is trapping (maybe some on their own land but no ones ROW trapping like they used to). No one is coon hunting. Iowa did not shell out a bunch of money to buy roadkill tails. What this area of Iowa did do is add a TON of CRP the past few years. It’s noticeable while driving through the 3-4 county area I hunt. I spent the weekend chasing roosters there. Ive hunted nearly every year there since I moved to SD in 2007. The bird population is the best Ive seen since around 03 or so. Numerous 10-20 bird flushes. Multiple properties (including public) with 100+ birds. We hunted probably 10 different pieces of ground several miles apart. ALL held a good number of birds, especially compared to the past. Another thing these properties had in common was the enormous amount of coon sign. We saw 5 coyotes-shot 2. There is not a lack of “nest raiders” or animals that kill birds. Im sure a ton of birds have been killed by these predators. I get the weather has been cooperative to have a good hatch/survival rate. But I truly believe the huge amount of habitat is as important, maybe more so than the weather. NSS, what else is new...? You have whined about our bounty program multiple times here on tman by stating that more habitat produces more birds. That is a given so why keep bashing the program? I have said, and continue to say, it is a political program. Are the "rich landowners" you state about Hutterite colonies because those people are the ones that make the most coin off of the SD bounty program and Gov. Kristi doesn't have to buy their votes, if they vote at all. Noem got elected as an old fashioned conservative who supports traditional things, including hunting and trapping. If you don't like her or her policies, go vote for lame *** Jamie Smith. Good luck in him getting elected--because you didn't grow up here let me remind you of some SD political history. There hasn't been a Democrat elected as SD governor since Dick Kneip back in the 1970s and Smith isn't going to break that drought. We live in a small state and I suspect you can probably get an audience with the Sec of G.F.&P if you ask and then you can express your frustrations with the bounty program. As I've said before, 500k doesn't go very far in renting land in say southeast SD. At $200 an acre (probably too cheap), the coin spent on the bounty program would get 2,500 additional acres put aside, and you would need to rent it for multiple years to get a "CRP like" parcel going. Nobody that already has good pheasant habitat established is going to rent to the state for $200 an acre, they can get that FOR 1PAY HUNTER FOR 1 DAY so if you want more habitat, the state would have to buy it out right. So, let's buy some land in se SD at $8000 an acre (again probably way too cheap) and that 500k will get you about 65 new acres to get up and running (if we're going from nearly bare cropland). In most years, farmers in SD plant about 4 MILLION acres of corn. Do you see the dilemma...? This is the last time I'll post on your SD tail bounty whines because the subject bores me. But, hey, knock yourself out in your displeasure...
"And God said, Let us make man in our image �and let them have dominion �and all the creatures that move along the ground". Genesis 1:26
|
|
|
Re: An argument against bounties
[Re: MattLA]
#7705109
10/31/22 07:50 AM
10/31/22 07:50 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Rodney,Ohio
SNIPERBBB
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Rodney,Ohio
|
The number one cause of animal population increase was the invention of the combine. Waste grain on the ground increased by leaps and bounds when combines came on the scene.
Not so much waste grain these days. Only time you see grain on the ground anymore is from spills. New combines dont leave any grain behind that it was able to scoop up. As a whole nature doesn't " regulate". It cycles from one one extreme to the other. You almost sound like guys that are against us hunters and trappers.
Nature does self regulate, theres a balance for everything. Humans have never done a great job. Red from Montana just proves my point, we already went down that road and killed almost game animal in the USA. The seasons were brought about to prevent extinction, not because some government entity wanted money. The propensity to support x number of species on a certain tract of land depends far more on the actual habitat than animals being trapped on it. Absolutely if you want to have a few years where those populations increase because you want to trap out the natural predators, it will work. The main point is you have to identify what the natural number is that the tract of land can support, and work from there. Yes Sir, thats a sorry reply to somebody who you disagree with, what do you want for approval? No animal self regulates. All animals are driven to reproduce as often as they can. Females will always come into heat when the normal times comes unless they're so malnourished that the cycle stops. Its not voluntary.The only limiting factor is food, water and shelter available. Sure animals might kill or abandon offspring to die if food supplies are limited. Balance in nature is basically an accident and temporary.
|
|
|
Re: An argument against bounties
[Re: NonPCfed]
#7705136
10/31/22 08:30 AM
10/31/22 08:30 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2011
SE SD
DWC
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Apr 2011
SE SD
|
Ive been against the money spent on South Dakotas roadkill coontail program since it started (in an effort to buy rich landowner donors-this is my opinion of course:)). Went back to Iowa this weekend, in an area no one is trapping (maybe some on their own land but no ones ROW trapping like they used to). No one is coon hunting. Iowa did not shell out a bunch of money to buy roadkill tails. What this area of Iowa did do is add a TON of CRP the past few years. It’s noticeable while driving through the 3-4 county area I hunt. I spent the weekend chasing roosters there. Ive hunted nearly every year there since I moved to SD in 2007. The bird population is the best Ive seen since around 03 or so. Numerous 10-20 bird flushes. Multiple properties (including public) with 100+ birds. We hunted probably 10 different pieces of ground several miles apart. ALL held a good number of birds, especially compared to the past. Another thing these properties had in common was the enormous amount of coon sign. We saw 5 coyotes-shot 2. There is not a lack of “nest raiders” or animals that kill birds. Im sure a ton of birds have been killed by these predators. I get the weather has been cooperative to have a good hatch/survival rate. But I truly believe the huge amount of habitat is as important, maybe more so than the weather. NSS, what else is new...? You have whined about our bounty program multiple times here on tman by stating that more habitat produces more birds. That is a given so why keep bashing the program? I have said, and continue to say, it is a political program. Are the "rich landowners" you state about Hutterite colonies because those people are the ones that make the most coin off of the SD bounty program and Gov. Kristi doesn't have to buy their votes, if they vote at all. Noem got elected as an old fashioned conservative who supports traditional things, including hunting and trapping. If you don't like her or her policies, go vote for lame *** Jamie Smith. Good luck in him getting elected--because you didn't grow up here let me remind you of some SD political history. There hasn't been a Democrat elected as SD governor since Dick Kneip back in the 1970s and Smith isn't going to break that drought. We live in a small state and I suspect you can probably get an audience with the Sec of G.F.&P if you ask and then you can express your frustrations with the bounty program. As I've said before, 500k doesn't go very far in renting land in say southeast SD. At $200 an acre (probably too cheap), the coin spent on the bounty program would get 2,500 additional acres put aside, and you would need to rent it for multiple years to get a "CRP like" parcel going. Nobody that already has good pheasant habitat established is going to rent to the state for $200 an acre, they can get that FOR 1PAY HUNTER FOR 1 DAY so if you want more habitat, the state would have to buy it out right. So, let's buy some land in se SD at $8000 an acre (again probably way too cheap) and that 500k will get you about 65 new acres to get up and running (if we're going from nearly bare cropland). In most years, farmers in SD plant about 4 MILLION acres of corn. Do you see the dilemma...? This is the last time I'll post on your SD tail bounty whines because the subject bores me. But, hey, knock yourself out in your displeasure... Somehow I knew you would chime in with your history lessons and calculations. Never things youve experienced or witnessed in the field. For the record, I dont want Jamie Smith. I hope your “Governor Kristi” gets elected, sinces she’s the best option out of the two. Run all the figures you want. Heres something from someone who has actually been out with boots on the ground. Ive hunted 4 days in SE SD so far this year. Ive seen a few birds but havent shouldered a gun. I havent seen a ton of coon sign-idk if distemper is creeping in or what. A few trails, but i wouldnt be excited if i was running 200 sets. Two days hunting in Iowa and my shoulder is sore. My father in law is seeing coyotes daily within half mile of his house and coon trails are bare dirt. Im sorry you only saw me bashing your precious Kristi-im sure she appreciates you defending her. You should give Iowa a call and see what their calculations are because theirs work great! Thanks Iowa and Governor Kim, Ill be back soon.
|
|
|
Re: An argument against bounties
[Re: TheYouthTrapper]
#7705192
10/31/22 10:12 AM
10/31/22 10:12 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Mesa,Washington.
Mark McCary
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2012
Mesa,Washington.
|
I like having the bounty as in my area I have seen an increase in turkeys and pheasants. I also like it because it has been one of the only things that has allowed me to expand the amount of gear I have. I know it has gotten many people in my school into trapping and I think that's the only thing that matters is that it's getting kids and others into trapping. Very well said young man!!!! I will add that Everything will benefit from proper management.
|
|
|
Re: An argument against bounties
[Re: Rat Masterson]
#7705201
10/31/22 10:22 AM
10/31/22 10:22 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2011
SE SD
DWC
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Apr 2011
SE SD
|
The key to pheasants is the right weather at the right time during nesting and when the chicks are hatched and being reared. I can't for the life of me figure out why anyone's shoulder would be sore shooting a limit of birds in Iowa unless they raised the limit to 50. SD has plenty of birds this year and plenty of coon, maybe they should pay bounty on fall coon, say $20 per tail. I'd be good for 500 coon. What part of SD? Its a big state. Southern Lincoln, Union, and Turner counties arent crawling with either coon or birds from what ive seen. And it was called sarcasm about the shoulder thing, although i was shooting a 50’s Ithaca 37 featherweight with no recoil pad in a t shirt.
|
|
|
Re: An argument against bounties
[Re: WhiteCliffs]
#7705259
10/31/22 12:09 PM
10/31/22 12:09 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Rodney,Ohio
SNIPERBBB
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Rodney,Ohio
|
As a land owner heavily involved in habitat management, also worked in the Nat Resource Management field for 34 with the Feds, and a degree in Wildlife Management - most habitat enhancement activities are expensive. We dont have a lot of crp projects down here in the south like they do in the midwest and north. Habitat enhancement is done as a direct activity. They are expensive, and generally take annual maintenance, and are usually not done at scale to make a lot of difference. $200 and some spring time labor can put you in the trapping business. Thats a big issue. Wildlife agencies and landowners generally don't have money to do a lot. If you can setup a farm that they can make money through the activity of making the habitat, its easier to talk them into it.
|
|
|
|
|