.... and mandatory pork consumption

It is possible if everyone would get off their butt. Explain in NY where they out number NYC and yet complain. If all of them did their duty, they would out vote the big apple and live the life of Riley. Your just like doom and gloom marty, oh, whoa as me. Truth be told, it is possible but there's to many people like you and marty out there who gave up.

Having grown up in NY, I'm not too sure what you're referencing. Are you comparing the population of NYS to NYC? If so, you're forgetting Buffalo, Niagara Falls, Syracuse, Rochester, Albany, and dozens of other democrat cities in the state.

I used to think that, but now believe he's Second Tier.

Larry Fink is a big mover too.

Another BIG "D"evil

X2, good insight Ang. We also need to educate everyone on WEF, claus schwab and his cronies. That is where simpletons like biden and truedope get their ideas! That little get together at Davos is where they get their marching orders. That needs cleaned out would be the first step!

I never gave up. You do not know what your talking about as usual, no surprise there...you want to vote new ships officers in after the Titanic hit the iceberg...but keep the captain.

There will not be another conservative potus for a very long time, something I have said for years now. We knew 4 years ago that by 24 they would have added the voters they needed in the places they needed them..now they are/have been rapidly accelerating that. Nothing is going to change until people face the reality of the situation and stop dreaming fantasies...the red wave fantasy in 22 is a great example of that. I said in 20 that would never happen....maybe listen to someone who has been right about many things all these years instead of dreaming. But your simple mind can just name call at me...what a joke you are.

Me personally Ive always felt the reason that us conservatives have not risen up, gone out and raised cain about our anger like the democrats do is because conservatives actually have morals and responsibilities. Conservatives have jobs, families they are trying to feed, goals and morals. Morals against burning down a city, killing people, stealing, etc. All the liberals that are burning down cities and creating chaos I promise you have no jobs or any desire to make themselves better other than to complain that they are victims of a make believe systematic racist society. The liberals in power are responsible of perpetuating this utter joke they have turned our country into. My personal opinion? Liberals are pests. Pests need eradication. If I wasn’t a hard working father of three beautiful children I would gladly be screaming for civil war to regain what this country used to be.

Marty, your comment proves you gave up, you think we can't be saved and I don't believe that. We the people still have the numbers but we don't show up to vote and we don't take the time to get involved in our own local politics. We let others decide who we vote for and that's messed up.

What I'm saying is if all of us got involved in putting good local people on the ballot, show up to vote, we could change both houses. I really believe it's possible. If we don't, it won't be long till SCOTUS is way left.

Also, Angela brought up a good point with Academia. We are pretty much screwed there and I sure don't know how to turn that around. I do think she's wrong about voting though, it is plausible. I'm not saying we can change things forever, we all know how the Gen Z's are. I do however think we can prolong our way of live for a spell, if we get involved.

^ you cannot understand my comments. No insults today? sobered up?

Crap, I forgot, your a butthead. See, I still have my internet muscles today and am still drunk on fried chicken, mashed taters and milk. So, you really don't think it's possible to change things in the right direction? Is your plan to preach negativity?

I would love to have an intelligent conversation but your not up too it. I asked you half a dozen times to just leave me alone because I want nothing to do with you but you keep quoting me..that's the kind of man you are, someone who does not understand civility. So, just (This word is unacceptable on Trapperman) off back to where you come from, thanks..

Knock it off both of you. You can always use the IGNORE function.

Will do, sorry Ken!

Thank you, if catch leaves me be as I asked him too multiple times I am very happy not to engage with him. But I will not sit here and have him trash talk about me with no response. I am sorry he forced me to defend myself....

DaveP: Thats a very good collective piece. I've copied that to give to others.

Thank you.

So, Marty,
What is your idea of a way back to a United States of America that many of us remember? Be specific, if you will.

Time travel.

Other than that we might be able to rebuild something similar to what we once had after some major catastrophic upheaval but that would take quite a while.

There is really nothing standing in the way of the liberals at this point and that is not going to change, unfortunately.

Someone said we need to start locally....well, Texas is basically behind their governor wanting to stop the flow of new liberal voters but they cannot so forget that idea..same in new mexico? where the governor double stacked containers to block gaps in the border wall only to have to remove them because of a federal lawsuit...so, if a state cannot change anything/protect its border from invasion how are we going to change anything with electing local leaders? There will not be another conservative potus or congress anytime in the near future.

There would be other options but people will not risk their personal wealth/safety on something like freedom. If we were not so soft as a nation maybe that would be different.

Is that specific enough?

“…….in order to secure a free state.”

Correcting history is going to be ugly, very ugly but it’s coming.

The Second Amendment: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Let’s look at this one step at a time.

We allegedly live in a “free state”.
In order to be free (and remain so), the state must be secure. If the state is not secure, it is not free.
To guarantee the security of our free state, a “well-regulated militia” is necessary (that’s a requirement; it is not “optional”). In a number of comments by the founding fathers it is evident that the “militia” is “the people themselves”.
To have this militia, the people must be armed (have possession of arms and carry them so that they are ready to hand at a moment’s notice).
Should the people be prohibited from keeping and bearing arms, the militia is undone, security is breached and our state (nation) is no longer free.

or:

In order to be free (and remain so), the state must be secure. If the state is not secure, it is not free.

One could argue that an open border is in violation to the constitution. But the newest scotus justice cannot even define what a woman is so good luck with that....