No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: Rat Masterson] #7795203
02/10/23 12:58 PM
02/10/23 12:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,585
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Offline
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,585
MN
Originally Posted by Rat Masterson
If you can't keep your dog on your property and out of the row how do you keep it off the road?


So don't hunt road row that abuts my private property because someone may throw 220s out there. I like row trapping and if someone traps my row with foothold and my dog hits it while we're out no problem, simple release.

When we lose row trapping because some guys insisted they should be able to throw dryland 220s in the row I'm really going to be upset.

At the time I had a shock collar on the spaniel and was training her not to go on the road on my farm. This was a young English cocker so probably 18 pound dog.

Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: goldy] #7795267
02/10/23 03:09 PM
02/10/23 03:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,422
USA-WI
K
Kre Offline
trapper
Kre  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,422
USA-WI
I hate to break it to you, but it's just a matter of time before you lose this battle.

Enjoy what you have while you can.

Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: goldy] #7795272
02/10/23 03:17 PM
02/10/23 03:17 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 10,491
MN
S
Steven 49er Offline
trapper
Steven 49er  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 10,491
MN
You guys are hung up on the conibear, the permission bill is just as bad


"Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon". Milton Friedman.
Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: Steven 49er] #7795387
02/10/23 06:37 PM
02/10/23 06:37 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,138
sseMinnesota
blackhammer Offline
trapper
blackhammer  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,138
sseMinnesota
Originally Posted by Steven 49er
You guys are hung up on the conibear, the permission bill is just as bad

Absolutely and the DP part of the bill is just plain ridiculous Often wonder if a state can basically ban a product indiscriminately without any study or review of facts legally ?


Ah,for the life of a millionaire,say some,but just let me stay a trapper. Bill Nelson
Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: goldy] #7795431
02/10/23 07:30 PM
02/10/23 07:30 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 10,491
MN
S
Steven 49er Offline
trapper
Steven 49er  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 10,491
MN
Of course the state can, they are the state.

Heck the just outlawed fossil fuels for electricity generation by 2040.


"Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon". Milton Friedman.
Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: Steven 49er] #7795493
02/10/23 08:28 PM
02/10/23 08:28 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,138
sseMinnesota
blackhammer Offline
trapper
blackhammer  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,138
sseMinnesota
Originally Posted by Steven 49er
Of course the state can, they are the state.

Heck the just outlawed fossil fuels for electricity generation by 2040.


You’re probably right comrade .


Ah,for the life of a millionaire,say some,but just let me stay a trapper. Bill Nelson
Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: goldy] #7795631
02/10/23 10:15 PM
02/10/23 10:15 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 397
MN
C
ceelmo.trap Offline
trapper
ceelmo.trap  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 397
MN
The whole debate about the ROW should be a moot point I suggest that all read the regs on this subject you have to have permission to trap in them as they are are not public land.Until I i hung up my conis I never had a problem trapping the row the only problems I had were with the hunters that thought that could just hunt the row and it was public for them to hunt. In no way should a dog owner think and in the fall that they can just go out and let their pet just run because its just a quick romp in the country. The dog owners know we are out there the dog hunters know we are out there whats not to understand people The rural landscape is not a dog park for them just to play in wake up..

Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: goldy] #7795856
02/11/23 09:06 AM
02/11/23 09:06 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 765
minnesota
G
gman Offline
trapper
gman  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 765
minnesota
Time to wake up. In MN dogs have more rights when it comes to hunting than we have. Hound hunters can go wherever they want to with no repercussions. Now they come on to my land and get hurt and I am responsible? A dead dog trespassing and you lose your lisc. for 5 years. It's only gonna get worse!

Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: gman] #7795889
02/11/23 09:40 AM
02/11/23 09:40 AM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,585
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Offline
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,585
MN
Originally Posted by gman
Time to wake up. In MN dogs have more rights when it comes to hunting than we have. Hound hunters can go wherever they want to with no repercussions. Now they come on to my land and get hurt and I am responsible? A dead dog trespassing and you lose your lisc. for 5 years. It's only gonna get worse!


There is a lawsuit that will be heard this summer that may end hound retrieval laws, lawsuit is in Virginia but I suspect the result will be applied here as well.

https://www.drovers.com/news/indust...over-property-rights-v-hunting-tradition

Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: Donnersurvivor] #7795929
02/11/23 10:19 AM
02/11/23 10:19 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,306
minnesota
G
goldy Offline OP
trapper
goldy  Offline OP
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,306
minnesota
Originally Posted by Donnersurvivor
Originally Posted by gman
Time to wake up. In MN dogs have more rights when it comes to hunting than we have. Hound hunters can go wherever they want to with no repercussions. Now they come on to my land and get hurt and I am responsible? A dead dog trespassing and you lose your lisc. for 5 years. It's only gonna get worse!


There is a lawsuit that will be heard this summer that may end hound retrieval laws, lawsuit is in Virginia but I suspect the result will be applied here as well.

SF855 would completely eliminate any legal hound retrieval in Minnesota


"They that can give up essential liberty to gain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety" Ben Franklin talking about guns
Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: goldy] #7795939
02/11/23 10:28 AM
02/11/23 10:28 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,138
sseMinnesota
blackhammer Offline
trapper
blackhammer  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,138
sseMinnesota
Pretty simple people who are against trapping and I’m sure hunting as well are using dogs as an excuse to get trapping banned. The fact that the number of dogs impacted by trapping is minuscule doesn’t matter.


Ah,for the life of a millionaire,say some,but just let me stay a trapper. Bill Nelson
Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: goldy] #7795950
02/11/23 10:44 AM
02/11/23 10:44 AM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,567
SE Minnesota
D
dustytinner Offline
trapper
dustytinner  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,567
SE Minnesota
So do you send the same email every week, or do you change the wording?


Life member Minnesota Trappers Association
FTA,Sportsmen's Alliance
Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: dustytinner] #7795957
02/11/23 10:50 AM
02/11/23 10:50 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,138
sseMinnesota
blackhammer Offline
trapper
blackhammer  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,138
sseMinnesota
Originally Posted by dustytinner
So do you send the same email every week, or do you change the wording?
I would change it a little and mention I e- mailed previously but felt it was important to keep this important issue on their radar Something like that Guess the main thing is keep sending respectful e-mails.


Ah,for the life of a millionaire,say some,but just let me stay a trapper. Bill Nelson
Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: dustytinner] #7795958
02/11/23 10:50 AM
02/11/23 10:50 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,306
minnesota
G
goldy Offline OP
trapper
goldy  Offline OP
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,306
minnesota
Originally Posted by dustytinner
So do you send the same email every week, or do you change the wording?
If you go to the "The Minnesota Trappers" or Minnesota Trappers Association Facebook page, there's a post on ideas to include in your emails. We're working on getting them onto the MTA website, but there's a glitch. Hopefully getting it on there soon

Last edited by goldy; 02/11/23 10:51 AM.

"They that can give up essential liberty to gain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety" Ben Franklin talking about guns
Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: goldy] #7796129
02/11/23 02:34 PM
02/11/23 02:34 PM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,567
SE Minnesota
D
dustytinner Offline
trapper
dustytinner  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,567
SE Minnesota
Thanks


Life member Minnesota Trappers Association
FTA,Sportsmen's Alliance
Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: blackhammer] #7796169
02/11/23 03:10 PM
02/11/23 03:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,585
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Offline
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,585
MN
Originally Posted by blackhammer
Pretty simple people who are against trapping and I’m sure hunting as well are using dogs as an excuse to get trapping banned. The fact that the number of dogs impacted by trapping is minuscule doesn’t matter.


Though dog incidences are rare we should acknowledge they are pretty dramatic and if we can decrease or eliminate them we need to do that. We are one highly publicized incident away from being a cage trap state IMO, I feel the "Don't give an inch" strategy was not the correct one.

Will the DNR be consulted to have their opinion asked about this bill? If so who will consult from the DNR and has anyone talked to them yet?

Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: goldy] #7796231
02/11/23 05:26 PM
02/11/23 05:26 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 5,529
West Central MN
20scout Offline
trapper
20scout  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 5,529
West Central MN
Last April I emailed the DNR in regards to the number of dogs caught in traps and this was their response:

"The DNR has been keeping records of canine trap incidents as reported to conservation officers since 2012. As of February 2021, there were 35 reported incidents of canine mortality (28 in body-grip traps, 7 in snares and none in footholds). Although we record each incident reported, it’s very likely that many incidents go unreported.

The DNR has worked with trapping and hunting groups to reduce canine trap incidents. The agency continues to support a science-based approach that increases trap selectivity while still allowing opportunities to continue to safely use body-grip traps.

Thanks for your question,

Jason Abraham

Minnesota DNR"

One has to wonder how many of these dogs where strays, or hunting dogs that should not have been on that property. Then there is also the question of LO's giving permission for someone to hunt their properties without the consideration that they have already given permission for someone else to trap/snare. I realize there are two sides to every story but it seems the trappers always come out on the short end of the stick.


Common sense is a not a vegetable that does well in everyone's garden.
Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: 20scout] #7796241
02/11/23 05:38 PM
02/11/23 05:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,306
minnesota
G
goldy Offline OP
trapper
goldy  Offline OP
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,306
minnesota
Originally Posted by 20scout
Last April I emailed the DNR in regards to the number of dogs caught in traps and this was their response:

"The DNR has been keeping records of canine trap incidents as reported to conservation officers since 2012. As of February 2021, there were 35 reported incidents of canine mortality (28 in body-grip traps, 7 in snares and none in footholds). Although we record each incident reported, it’s very likely that many incidents go unreported.

The DNR has worked with trapping and hunting groups to reduce canine trap incidents. The agency continues to support a science-based approach that increases trap selectivity while still allowing opportunities to continue to safely use body-grip traps.

Thanks for your question,

Jason Abraham

Minnesota DNR"

One has to wonder how many of these dogs where strays, or hunting dogs that should not have been on that property. Then there is also the question of LO's giving permission for someone to hunt their properties without the consideration that they have already given permission for someone else to trap/snare. I realize there are two sides to every story but it seems the trappers always come out on the short end of the stick.


Those 35 dogs were over many years. I dont remember the exact amount of years, but it came out to like 3 per year. I've seen the incident reports on many of them. The VAST majority were free roaming dogs trespassing on private property. Some weren't even from trappers, but people trying to catch skunks or coons under their own buildings.


"They that can give up essential liberty to gain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety" Ben Franklin talking about guns
Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: goldy] #7796302
02/11/23 07:08 PM
02/11/23 07:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 243
ME.
W
WBG Offline
trapper
WBG  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 243
ME.
You would be hard pressed to find a greater proponent of trappers rights than Myself but baited 220s on the ground and accessible to hunting dogs is just plain stupid.

Re: Minnesota Trappers: legislative alert! [Re: WBG] #7796343
02/11/23 08:04 PM
02/11/23 08:04 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,306
minnesota
G
goldy Offline OP
trapper
goldy  Offline OP
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,306
minnesota
Originally Posted by WBG
You would be hard pressed to find a greater proponent of trappers rights than Myself but baited 220s on the ground and accessible to hunting dogs is just plain stupid.

Hunting dogs were seldom being caught, none lately. The boxes have to have overhangs and the traps recessed inside the box now.


"They that can give up essential liberty to gain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety" Ben Franklin talking about guns
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread