NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd - Trapperman Forums

No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter

Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum

~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~

Minnesota Trapline Products

Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products

Register Log In Home Forums Trapper Talk NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd

Print Thread

Hop To

Page 2 of 3

1

2

3

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Marty] #7795901 02/11/23 09:55 AM 02/11/23 09:55 AM
Joined: May 2008 Mn N nightlife trapper
nightlife trapper N Joined: May 2008 Mn	Not a fan of the NRA, became a life member back when Heston was director, and a member of GOA and GOA is where my spare donations go for all the reasons stated above By the way 25 states have joined the law suit against the pistol brace ban https://youtu.be/ExSC4ctwRn0 �Everything in excess! To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites. Moderation is for monks.� ― Robert A. Heinlein

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Marty] #7795915 02/11/23 10:04 AM 02/11/23 10:04 AM
Joined: Apr 2022 Wisconsin G Guss trapper
Guss trapper G Joined: Apr 2022 Wisconsin	The NRA also had their hands out begging for money and not getting much done! That's why I stopped being a member.

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Yes sir] #7795923 02/11/23 10:11 AM 02/11/23 10:11 AM
Joined: Apr 2009 South Ga - Almost Florida Swamp Wolf trapper
Swamp Wolf trapper Joined: Apr 2009 South Ga - Almost Florida	Originally Posted by Yes sir I thought I'd heard recently the attorney General of California state that despite the Supreme Courts interpretation of the constitution that they(being the state of California)would still prosecute individuals that broke their(California)gun laws Yep^^^ State's law can legally be more restrictive than federal law...but not less restrictive. Thank God For Your Blessings! Never Half-Arse Anything! Resource Protection Service

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Swamp Wolf] #7795945 02/11/23 10:35 AM 02/11/23 10:35 AM
Joined: Feb 2020 Indiana P Providence Farm trapper
Providence Farm trapper P Joined: Feb 2020 Indiana	Originally Posted by Swamp Wolf Originally Posted by Yes sir I thought I'd heard recently the attorney General of California state that despite the Supreme Courts interpretation of the constitution that they(being the state of California)would still prosecute individuals that broke their(California)gun laws Yep^^^ State's law can legally be more restrictive than federal law...but not less restrictive. But they can't go so far as to violate conditional rights and that's what they are doing.

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Marty] #7795961 02/11/23 10:51 AM 02/11/23 10:51 AM
Joined: Apr 2009 South Ga - Almost Florida Swamp Wolf trapper
Swamp Wolf trapper Joined: Apr 2009 South Ga - Almost Florida	I stand somewhat corrected on this....after reading up on the US Supremecy clause. But there are a lot of cases where this is backwards Thank God For Your Blessings! Never Half-Arse Anything! Resource Protection Service

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Marty] #7795963 02/11/23 10:54 AM 02/11/23 10:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2006 williamsburg ks D danny clifton "Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton "Grumpy Old Man" D Joined: Dec 2006 williamsburg ks	States can not legally violate a supreme court decision. Trying to sue a state is expensive. Just like LEO's who get qualified immunity, (a term made up by a judge) state legislators, governors, prosecutors and judges have insulated themselves very effectively. Here in KS you only have to tell a cop your armed if they ask. If armed and asked for I.D. you must provide it. I dont know what the law is if one took it upon hisself to disassemble your firearm. I have never been asked if I am armed so I don't tell them. Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: randall brannon] #7795967 02/11/23 10:56 AM 02/11/23 10:56 AM
Joined: Mar 2011 Montana ,Rocky Mtns. Sharon "American Honey"
Sharon "American Honey" Joined: Mar 2011 Montana ,Rocky Mtns.	Originally Posted by randall brannon Originally Posted by Sharon The SC already reiterated the Constitution , even stating citizens right in NYC can carry, despite the liberal "laws" there...why would they need to say it all again ? Or am I missing something ? You are right but LiberalDemonrats do not care and prosecute anyway. In WV of all places I did as instructed when I was pulled over for a Bogus Seat Belt Violation. I informed him that I Concealed carry and put my gun on the dash. He took my gun and later I noticed about three more Officers pulled up and when I got my gun back they had completely dismantled my 45 into hundreds of little pieces. ALL this because they THOUGHT I did not have my seat belt on. FIRST you are not allowed to pull a driver over for a seat Belt violation but only for another reason. Then you can ADD a Seat Belt Violation. SECOND my Truck is a 1967 Chevy C-10 short wheel base 4X4 and only has a lapbelt and it was on!!! I have filed an ETHICS Complaint and am waiting on the Court Date!!! So , of course they ignore the rulings of the SC. As well as the Constitution. That should be all anyone needs to shut up and get on with life, or move to China. Thanks for explaining . I hope you take your case to the full. I'm amazed states like WV even act like this. http://www.illustrationsinmotion.com/index.html

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Marty] #7795971 02/11/23 10:58 AM 02/11/23 10:58 AM
Joined: Apr 2009 South Ga - Almost Florida Swamp Wolf trapper
Swamp Wolf trapper Joined: Apr 2009 South Ga - Almost Florida	https://www.cato.org/commentary/yes-states-can-nullify-some-federal-laws-not-all Thank God For Your Blessings! Never Half-Arse Anything! Resource Protection Service

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Marty] #7795974 02/11/23 11:00 AM 02/11/23 11:00 AM
Joined: Dec 2006 williamsburg ks D danny clifton "Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton "Grumpy Old Man" D Joined: Dec 2006 williamsburg ks	Search The Civil Rights Lawyer on you tube. He works in WV. Has a channel. Some pretty crazy video is sent to him and subsequent court cases he is involved in. Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Marty] #7795975 02/11/23 11:06 AM 02/11/23 11:06 AM
Joined: Sep 2022 Kansas K Kansasace2 trapper
Kansasace2 trapper K Joined: Sep 2022 Kansas	If mine was disassembled I would put the flashers on and reassemble. They could sit there and watch me do it to. If any parts were missing that would be another suit headed their way.

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: danny clifton] #7795982 02/11/23 11:09 AM 02/11/23 11:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2007 MD D DaveP trapper
DaveP trapper D Joined: Jan 2007 MD	Originally Posted by danny clifton Search The Civil Rights Lawyer on you tube. He works in WV. Has a channel. Some pretty crazy video is sent to him and subsequent court cases he is involved in. Yup!

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Kansasace2] #7795983 02/11/23 11:09 AM 02/11/23 11:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2007 MD D DaveP trapper
DaveP trapper D Joined: Jan 2007 MD	Originally Posted by Kansasace2 If mine was disassembled I would put the flashers on and reassemble. They could sit there and watch me do it to. If any parts were missing that would be another suit headed their way. I've met a few who can't reassemble their OWN gun...

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Marty] #7795986 02/11/23 11:16 AM 02/11/23 11:16 AM
Joined: Jan 2014 North East Kansas Marty OP trapper
Marty OP trapper Joined: Jan 2014 North East Kansas	That's a lot of pieces.... po-po ain't yo friend anymore. Rise and Rise Again Until Lambs Become Lions

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Marty] #7796086 02/11/23 01:22 PM 02/11/23 01:22 PM
Joined: Dec 2008 eastern washinghton 7 70sdiver trapper
70sdiver trapper 7 Joined: Dec 2008 eastern washinghton	Dropped my membership I couldn't see donating and the money just gets spend on trying to raise more money. Wayne LaPierre 2014: In 2014, NRA contributions totaled $103 million and LaPierre's compensation was $985,885.[13] In 2015, NRA contributions totaled $95 million. In that year, LaPierre received a $3.7 million deferred compensation distribution from his "employee funded deferred compensation plan", which was required by federal law, and according to the NRA raised his total annual compensation to $5,110,985. That payment for what he does is absolutely ludicrous.

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Marty] #7796170 02/11/23 03:10 PM 02/11/23 03:10 PM
Joined: Dec 2008 Eastern Shore of Maryland HobbieTrapper "Chippendale Trapper"
HobbieTrapper "Chippendale Trapper" Joined: Dec 2008 Eastern Shore of Maryland	Originally Posted by Marty That's a lot of pieces.... po-po ain't yo friend anymore. -Goofy

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: randall brannon] #7796206 02/11/23 04:52 PM 02/11/23 04:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2006 Sugar Grove, WV J JTfromWV trapper
JTfromWV trapper J Joined: Dec 2006 Sugar Grove, WV	Originally Posted by randall brannon You are right but LiberalDemonrats do not care and prosecute anyway. In WV of all places I did as instructed when I was pulled over for a Bogus Seat Belt Violation. I informed him that I Concealed carry and put my gun on the dash. He took my gun and later I noticed about three more Officers pulled up and when I got my gun back they had completely dismantled my 45 into hundreds of little pieces. ALL this because they THOUGHT I did not have my seat belt on. FIRST you are not allowed to pull a driver over for a seat Belt violation but only for another reason. Then you can ADD a Seat Belt Violation. SECOND my Truck is a 1967 Chevy C-10 short wheel base 4X4 and only has a lapbelt and it was on!!! I have filed an ETHICS Complaint and am waiting on the Court Date!!! Did they ask you if you had a weapon? You do not have to disclose this information unless asked.

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: JTfromWV] #7796334 02/11/23 07:50 PM 02/11/23 07:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2014 west virginia usa R randall brannon trapper
randall brannon trapper R Joined: Dec 2014 west virginia usa	Originally Posted by JTfromWV Originally Posted by randall brannon You are right but LiberalDemonrats do not care and prosecute anyway. In WV of all places I did as instructed when I was pulled over for a Bogus Seat Belt Violation. I informed him that I Concealed carry and put my gun on the dash. He took my gun and later I noticed about three more Officers pulled up and when I got my gun back they had completely dismantled my 45 into hundreds of little pieces. ALL this because they THOUGHT I did not have my seat belt on. FIRST you are not allowed to pull a driver over for a seat Belt violation but only for another reason. Then you can ADD a Seat Belt Violation. SECOND my Truck is a 1967 Chevy C-10 short wheel base 4X4 and only has a lapbelt and it was on!!! I have filed an ETHICS Complaint and am waiting on the Court Date!!! Did they ask you if you had a weapon? You do not have to disclose this information unless asked. If you have a concealed weapon on you and you have a CC Permit the LAW specifically states that when ANY Officer approaches you during a stop or for ANY reason you MUST IMMEDIATELY inform the Officer you are carrying a concealed weapon. That is the law and the same in Florida as well. God please keep they 19 fallen UBB miners out of trouble up there.

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: danny clifton] #7796338 02/11/23 07:52 PM 02/11/23 07:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2014 west virginia usa R randall brannon trapper
randall brannon trapper R Joined: Dec 2014 west virginia usa	Originally Posted by danny clifton Search The Civil Rights Lawyer on you tube. He works in WV. Has a channel. Some pretty crazy video is sent to him and subsequent court cases he is involved in. Would you happen to have his name or Number?? I would love ro get it!!! God please keep they 19 fallen UBB miners out of trouble up there.

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Marty] #7796339 02/11/23 07:55 PM 02/11/23 07:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2007 MD D DaveP trapper
DaveP trapper D Joined: Jan 2007 MD	Originally Posted by randall brannon Originally Posted by danny clifton Search The Civil Rights Lawyer on you tube. He works in WV. Has a channel. Some pretty crazy video is sent to him and subsequent court cases he is involved in. Would you happen to have his name or Number?? I would love ro get it!!! John H. Bryan civilrightslawyer@ellify.com

Re: NRA predicts Supreme Court will finally define 2nd [Re: Marty] #7796346 02/11/23 08:07 PM 02/11/23 08:07 PM
Joined: Oct 2011 Western Shore Delaware SJA trapper
SJA trapper Joined: Oct 2011 Western Shore Delaware	"If you have a concealed weapon on you and you have a CC Permit the LAW specifically states that when ANY Officer approaches you during a stop or for ANY reason you MUST IMMEDIATELY inform the Officer you are carrying a concealed weapon. That is the law and the same in Florida as well." The "Must Notify Law" does NOT apply in all States. PS . . . DO NOT offer any information on anything unless ASKED! . . . Remember "Miranda"? Last edited by SJA; 02/11/23 08:10 PM. "Humans are the hardest people to get along with." Dr. Phillip Snow

Page 2 of 3

1

2

3

Moderated by 330-Trapper, Bogmaster, Cindy, cotton, Drifter, Maddog47, Paul Dobbins, USMC47 🦫, Wolfdog91

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1