If you need the practice, have at em. Unless you’re getting payed you’re gonna lose money. They are not gonna get any significant turnaround in predator control until they put a 15-25 dollar bounty on the nest robbers like the Dakotas has. Then you might see a lot of trappers take notice of it. It ain’t like the Mo. conservation doesn’t have the money to do that either. I don’t think they wanted anything to do with this extended season and the early season, but got pressured into it by deer, quail, turkey, and duck organizations to do something about the animals.
Clay is right about in the very near future ( or now) that if you want problem animals controlled, you gonna have to pay to get it done. If fur prices go up it will alter this equation, but that probably ain’t gonna happen in the near future.
Sorry, but you have been mislead. As a trapper, yeah the $ is good, but in truth they’d be way farther ahead investing the money’s doled out into habitat reclamation projects. Ya ou can trap all the “nest raiders” you want, but without proper nesting and brooding habitat there will never be many nests for them to raid. Fact.. came to the Dakotas and see for yourself. Living here my entire life, pheasant and partridge numbers always fluctuated, but always had a lot, just an awful lot some years. Now, with intensive agriculture and big farming practices we get a few on some years and very few most of the time compared to what it once was. Partridge are all but gone, and real pheasants are in isolated pockets. The only change is farming practices of today, with no cover you have no game period. I know people will say we went there to a place and saw hundreds if not thousands, hate to burst your bubble, but you were more than likely paying to shoot colorful pen raised glorified chickens. I miss the days of thousand wild bird flushes, sadly they are a thing of the past.