So what’s going to be the outcome when Dominion faces a real suit that proves that they in fact altered voting outcomes?

If they wanted to win....the people behind fox, that is.

maybe they did not want to win or expose anything...that is a real possibility.

That bunch in New Castle county could watch a video of a ballot actually changing and they wouldn’t side with Fox.

That’s why there should of been a trial,,,,especially on a issue this important

If dominion had such an airtight case???

Why settle for half??

This leaves nothing but questions/doubts

No they are not legit. Anyone see 2000 mules ?

Corrupt judicial system hides the truth!

That's why the republicans need to get on board with it also.

Nobody settles for less than they want.
They ask for double what they want and settle for half of that number.

You know like the retail sale after Christmas.Jack the price up 30% for Christmas then "slash" it by 20% on Boxing Day.

I saw video last night of Charlie Kirk giving the explanation that he knew about. He said FOX saw the judge, prosecutors, were all Democrat radicals who routinely twist the laws in court cases and hearings. ( As we well know from many lesser suits). In a radical liberal state, they discerned that moving forward, regardless of all the evidence they could have, would end up in a very long , drawn out proceeding that would be designed to cost them much more than they settled on. With the result ending the same as for any number of other cases everyone has seen happen in states like that , who call conservatives and parents terrorists , rioters and trans freaks, poor little victims . Among many other things they routinely demonstrate, in breaking the laws and Constitution, continually.

Kirk kept saying, if folks like FOX or not, that isn't the point. The point was that these Soros, or radical lawbreaking prosecutors and judges have been after any platform that hints of loving America, the Constitution, and freedoms. If they don't agree with trans freaks, castrating children, teaching woke agendas in Universities and schools, hating police, etc. The fact that FOX has held their own against non-stop onslaught from every angle to take them off air , says a lot.

Who supposedly said what , from there, is also not even the point. Quibbling on hearsay , or a doctored up quote handed out from Marxist liberal sources, is mediocre cheap distraction only.

The aim in Marxist purpose looms high and more powerful ...Kirk kept saying , be careful what you wish for...if they become successful in taking down the highest rated station, that does have a decent amount of good conservative show hosts , the others will also fall in short order.

FOX remains . If the prosecutors and judge could at all have anything on them, to take them down, they surely would. They've been howling to take it down for a long time.

Settling as they did, FOX saved themselves months of distraction, a ton of money, and still the high, probable risk of being condemned and taken out , regardless of their evidence. We all have seen that happen in every single lesser case , when liberal Democrat authorities have been in control.

Kirk gave the illustration of Musk paying way too much to buy Twitter. Musk admits that it wasn't near worth the cost...it was the principal .

Charlie didn't have detailed information, because he didn't have it. But he did share the overview and logic of why FOX decided as they did.

Like Musk did, they paid a lot for the principal of retaining their freedom.

You can double Arkansas guarantee....if the court prosecutors and judge could see a crack in the case, to take FOX down, they'd jump on that as fast as you can slap a tick.

Not when it comes too election integrity

Their company reputation isn’t open for negotiation/discounts


This reply was for bozo

maybe fox has no integrity?

the libs forced fox to pay a no-cancel fee?

I stream Pluto to watch Real America’s Voice that Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon are on was off during both shows! Coincidence I wonder!

I think there may be even bigger issues involved.

If it had gone to trial and Fox lost, they may have appealed all the way to SCOTUS.

If Dominion lost, they too may have appealed all the way to SCOTUS.

The question would concern the "actual malice" provision of the NYT v Sullivan.

Two SCOTUS justices have already expressed a desire to look at that decision again.

If the court overturned Sullivan...it could have some serious impact on first amendment rights (as they are currently viewed).

Most all media outlets have been on Dominion's side .....simply because they hate Fox both as a competitor and ideologically.

In the long run it could be "bad" for all media companies in general if Dominion had won on appeal. ...or if SCOTUS overturned Sullivan

This way, nothing has changed legally and Fox has probably dodged an even more expensive bullet. The hit to their reputation is even more costly

That information is held tightly by those who might benefit the most from such a scam .

Fox in charge of the hen house

is all media a scam?

playing all people for fools?

The opposition controls every level of the legal system....Fox sees what has happened so far with compelling evidence, and how they just brushed it aside, and say it doesn't have "standing"...Fox is a business with limited financial resources, while the government is as corrupt as any on the planet, with unlimited financial resources.

And I thought I wasn’t going to think about it as much today. Oh well, perhaps tomorrow.

No argument about government having unlimited resources but it wasn't government suing Fox.

I think it was a smart decision on the part of Fox and Dominion to settle this.
If it had gone to SCOTUS..........almost any decision would have been less than ideal.

If Fox had won, it might have encouraged media outlets to be even less careful with the truth than they are today.And that's really saying something.

If Dominion had won it would absolutely encourage more frivolous lawsuits against media outlets for any perceived slight.

Also the multiple millions more in legal expenses would have been a no win situation for both parties.


People mention "compelling evidence" but I have yet to see it. I wish I could but so far no credible source has produced any that I have seen.
Maybe you can point me in that direction.

Not pointing 17.

Dominion is suing News Max next!

LMAO!