Its like I tried to tell you a few weeks ago. Boone had many posts on Vmax. The problem that you are facing is (in my opinion) isn't a difference in opinion its a difference in experience. So sure you can shoot a Vmax and it work just fine. So when you talk to someone about it and they have killed a few and it worked just fine for them they swear by it and then you ask them what they think. Then you have guys like Boone that has already shot more yotes with a rifle than shots I will ever take at them with one. Someone like that has developed an opinion after many trials and errors. People like that know that if he shoots 25 yotes with a vmax that say 3 or 4 will not go well and that makes people like him say they aren't good enough. Some people haven't shot enough to get to that conclusion and others have and don't care what the bullet did to the critter just so it fell over dead. So.... when you ask around and get differing opinions its not b/c someone is right or wrong. Its because they are telling you what works for them and everyone doesn't have the same goal. So you have to consider that and what you are trying to do and how that applies to your goal, whatever it is that you are trying to do. Myself, I simplify it. I read all of Boones post and realize that he tested things way more than I ever could and I trust his ability opinion ethics and fur handling. And thats why trapperman is great.
Exactly,hence why I make posts like this or the one I did a while back on .22-250.
Taking that information I'm given by all these people with all the details from all over helps form a picture. It's not dissimilar to how researches or scientists look at stuff. Ask enough people get enough details you can start seeing trends .
Group a
people who don't like vmaxs don't like them because XYZ
Group b
Most people who do like them like them because ABC
Mabye these people who hate them are shooting them way farther then the other guys so there's that range aspect to them. Mabye it's a certain grain . Like you said what's good or acceptable for one groups may be terrible for others.
So it's not really a question of what's the best or something like that it's why does it works so well for some and not others . And getting all your information and data from one person, well that's just not very scientific
When I study experts in various fields they really break stuff down when their curious about something and they value opinions from everyone. Of course they don't take everything as the 100% truth but man there amazing listeners.they ask why more then anything and when you have these killers and world champion and guys who legit write the books doing that.... I mean seems like a good idea
And the whole personal experience deal . Look that's fine and dandy but when you wanna know what a particular thing does in say Montana in the freezing cold it makes a lot of sense to just ask the guys out there who have used it in those conditions instead of just stopping your life and saying hay imma go to Montana and for three years and do nothing but test these bullets . They already have some data of that lemme just ask them .then I can compare that to people from other places. It's like reading books posts about trapping beaver up north then reading swamp wolfs about trapping beaver in the south. Neither is wrong but they do have differing views on stuff and by reading and comparing their post you can get a great understanding on the what and why's.
I know it probably makes me look like an absolute idiot and a laughing stock but at this point I'm fine with that