| 
| 
 
| 
| 
|  Re: New Tacomas vs Older Ones
[Re: J. Brooks]
 #8122853 04/16/24 03:38 PM
04/16/24 03:38 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Dec 2006 Coldspring Texas
Savell
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Dec 2006
 Coldspring Texas
 | 
… I’ve had 2010 - 2022 …. They all worked fine off-road  … my 2022…. Good truck so far…. Pic is the cleanest it’s been since the lot lol   ![[Linked Image]](https://trapperman.com/forum/attachments/usergals/2024/04/full-105-215457-5696e929_d312_4186_b583_1ce790971d36.jpeg)  …. And my 2013 is still running strong… traded the 2010 in on it years ago and had no problems with it either   ![[Linked Image]](https://trapperman.com/forum/attachments/usergals/2024/04/full-105-215472-a17aa6e1_2ee2_48c8_be28_0a09fbb54d6d.jpeg)  
 Insert profound nonsense here
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: New Tacomas vs Older Ones
[Re: trapdog1]
 #8122876 04/16/24 04:14 PM
04/16/24 04:14 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Dec 2010 Montana
J. Brooks
  OP trapper
 |  
|  OP trapper
 
 Joined:  Dec 2010
 Montana
 | 
I have a 2023 and like it well enough. Gas mileage sucks and is even worse when pulling stuff. But seems to be a good, solid truck. It did pretty well in the little bit of heavy snow and bad roads I drove this winter. If I'm not mistaken, the 2024s are all 4 cylinder engines.
Can you define "sucks"...like "hoped for 20s and only getting high teens" or more like "low teens when pulling" Great info guys. I appreciate it. The 2023s have a 3.5L V6 which is what I was mostly looking at. My buddy has a 2014 (I think) 4 cylinder and it has been very reliable but not something I would want to load up a bunch of gear and drive thousands of miles with. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: New Tacomas vs Older Ones
[Re: J. Brooks]
 #8122897 04/16/24 04:43 PM
04/16/24 04:43 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Dec 2006 Coldspring Texas
Savell
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Dec 2006
 Coldspring Texas
 | 
I have a 2023 and like it well enough. Gas mileage sucks and is even worse when pulling stuff. But seems to be a good, solid truck. It did pretty well in the little bit of heavy snow and bad roads I drove this winter. If I'm not mistaken, the 2024s are all 4 cylinder engines.
Can you define "sucks"...like "hoped for 20s and only getting high teens" or more like "low teens when pulling" Great info guys. I appreciate it. The 2023s have a 3.5L V6 which is what I was mostly looking at. My buddy has a 2014 (I think) 4 cylinder and it has been very reliable but not something I would want to load up a bunch of gear and drive thousands of miles with. …. My 2022 gets 19 
 Insert profound nonsense here
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: New Tacomas vs Older Ones
[Re: J. Brooks]
 #8122963 04/16/24 06:04 PM
04/16/24 06:04 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Nov 2007 St. Cloud, MN
trapperkeck
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Nov 2007
 St. Cloud, MN
 | 
As long as you can get out and walk around frequently. They might be OK.  No way I would get a Tacoma if I had to spend a lot of time behind the wheel.  I wanted one really bad, until I drove one and the lady sat in it.  Not happenin' here, zero comfort in the cab.   Also, better gas mileage with a full-size Chevy with a V-8, capable of pulling a crap load more in addition to a lot more cargo/cab space.  Not a big fan of tranny and lifter repairs on the Chevy, but it's a much nicer driving experience.  Forgot to mention, they wanted $5K more for the yota. 
Last edited by trapperkeck; 04/16/24 06:05 PM.
 
 "The voice of reason!"
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: New Tacomas vs Older Ones
[Re: J. Brooks]
 #8122973 04/16/24 06:19 PM
04/16/24 06:19 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Feb 2016 Kentucky
ky_coyote_hunter
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Feb 2016
 Kentucky
 | 
Have a '08 access cab, auto tranny 4.0 V6 103,000 miles ... Also a '18 Pro, manual tranny, 3.5 V6 with 19,000 miles....Looks like I need to sell the Pro, Lol.
 Tacoma's have lost reliability with each successive generation, frame rust issues aside,  IMO.
 
 Wouldn't touch a '24 with the turbo four with a 10 ft pole.
 
 
 
 
 Member  -  FTA
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: New Tacomas vs Older Ones
[Re: J. Brooks]
 #8122982 04/16/24 06:34 PM
04/16/24 06:34 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Feb 2020 MT
Slick Pan
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Feb 2020
 MT
 | 
I just purchased a 2021 with 18K miles. I looked a little while and missed a couple. They sell quick. I wanted the V 6 because the 4 cyl. turbo are unproven. A dealer near me said every 2024 he will receive is presold for a year out. A few weeks ago they had not received any. 
Last edited by Slick Pan; 04/16/24 06:38 PM.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: New Tacomas vs Older Ones
[Re: J. Brooks]
 #8123026 04/16/24 07:44 PM
04/16/24 07:44 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Feb 2015 Iowa
trapdog1
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Feb 2015
 Iowa
 | 
I have a 2023 and like it well enough. Gas mileage sucks and is even worse when pulling stuff. But seems to be a good, solid truck. It did pretty well in the little bit of heavy snow and bad roads I drove this winter. If I'm not mistaken, the 2024s are all 4 cylinder engines.
Can you define "sucks"...like "hoped for 20s and only getting high teens" or more like "low teens when pulling" Great info guys. I appreciate it. The 2023s have a 3.5L V6 which is what I was mostly looking at. My buddy has a 2014 (I think) 4 cylinder and it has been very reliable but not something I would want to load up a bunch of gear and drive thousands of miles with. The best it will do is about 20. Drops into the teens pretty fast when pulling my boat. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: New Tacomas vs Older Ones
[Re: trapperkeck]
 #8123028 04/16/24 07:46 PM
04/16/24 07:46 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Feb 2015 Iowa
trapdog1
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Feb 2015
 Iowa
 | 
As long as you can get out and walk around frequently. They might be OK.  No way I would get a Tacoma if I had to spend a lot of time behind the wheel.  I wanted one really bad, until I drove one and the lady sat in it.  Not happenin' here, zero comfort in the cab.   Also, better gas mileage with a full-size Chevy with a V-8, capable of pulling a crap load more in addition to a lot more cargo/cab space.  Not a big fan of tranny and lifter repairs on the Chevy, but it's a much nicer driving experience.  Forgot to mention, they wanted $5K more for the yota.I think the comfort level is fine. I spend most of my time in a Silverado for work, and don't find it any more comfortable. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: New Tacomas vs Older Ones
[Re: Miley]
 #8123029 04/16/24 07:48 PM
04/16/24 07:48 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Feb 2015 Iowa
trapdog1
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Feb 2015
 Iowa
 | 
A friends friend just bought a 2023  pro , last of the gen 3 v6. Paid otd on Long Island…………………$85,000!! I’ll keep my 2017 off-road!Somebody would actually pay that much for a Tacoma? Good Lord! |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: New Tacomas vs Older Ones
[Re: trapdog1]
 #8123031 04/16/24 07:50 PM
04/16/24 07:50 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Nov 2012 midland, michigan
midlander
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Nov 2012
 midland, michigan
 | 
As long as you can get out and walk around frequently. They might be OK.  No way I would get a Tacoma if I had to spend a lot of time behind the wheel.  I wanted one really bad, until I drove one and the lady sat in it.  Not happenin' here, zero comfort in the cab.   Also, better gas mileage with a full-size Chevy with a V-8, capable of pulling a crap load more in addition to a lot more cargo/cab space.  Not a big fan of tranny and lifter repairs on the Chevy, but it's a much nicer driving experience.  Forgot to mention, they wanted $5K more for the yota.I think the comfort level is fine. I spend most of my time in a Silverado for work, and don't find it any more comfortable. X2....drive a chevy trailboss for work and its not a bit more comfy.  Its not plush leather by any means, but seems fine to me.  Everyone's  different, if it don't  work for ya, it dont work.... |  |  |  
 
 |  |