Barnes LRX Long-Range Hunting Bullets
#8153365
06/11/24 05:41 PM
06/11/24 05:41 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Northern CA
Robert Martin
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Mar 2013
Northern CA
|
Does anyone have any experience using these bullets on game? https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1010404877?pid=423022fixed the link I think... I'm thinking of ordering a box of the 101 grain bullets to load for my 25-06. It seems to have the best ballistic coefficient I can find for a California approved lead free bullet. I'm using the 115 grain TSX bullets now, I do like the idea of the heavier bullet... BUT the faster 101 grain bullet will drop 4.5 inches less at 500 yards, and have 70 ft.-pounds more energy at 500 yards. If the bullet performance on game is good, it would be worth me trying them out to see how they shoot. Thanks,
Last edited by Robert Martin; 06/13/24 10:53 AM. Reason: fixing the link to the bullets...
Robert Martin
|
|
|
Re: Barnes LRX Long-Range Hunting Bullets
[Re: Robert Martin]
#8153731
06/12/24 07:12 AM
06/12/24 07:12 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2016
SD
TC1
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2016
SD
|
Now here’s the real question. Will you be shooting any deer at 500+ yards? Is your equipment up to it, and are you up to it? Not inferring you are not, just asking that question. If the terrain you hunt and you and your equipment are up to it maybe worth changing. But if your shooting anywhere less than that distance the virtual minuscule difference in bullet drop would make it hard for me to change from a proven winner.. I love the TSX & TTSX btw.
Thread snitch non reporter #2
|
|
|
Re: Barnes LRX Long-Range Hunting Bullets
[Re: Robert Martin]
#8153838
06/12/24 11:39 AM
06/12/24 11:39 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2023
MO
Crappiekiller
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2023
MO
|
I have used the TSX/TTSX/LRX in multiple chamberings. 6mm/257/6.5/7mm/308/8mm.
All have performed very well. I did catch a TTSX from a 264 WM in a bedded buck. Bullet impacted just in front of the front shoulder as the deer was facing me at a slight angle. Bullet was found on the off ham, retained over 80% of original weight.
CK
|
|
|
Re: Barnes LRX Long-Range Hunting Bullets
[Re: Robert Martin]
#8153945
06/12/24 04:09 PM
06/12/24 04:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Alaska and Washington State
waggler
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2008
Alaska and Washington State
|
In the past, the problem with most solid copper bullets and "long range" is that once the velocity drops below about 1800 fps, they fail to expand very well. It sounds like Barnes may have remedied this with the LRX bullet; interesting.
"My life is better than your vacation"
|
|
|
Re: Barnes LRX Long-Range Hunting Bullets
[Re: TC1]
#8154359
06/13/24 10:46 AM
06/13/24 10:46 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Northern CA
Robert Martin
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Mar 2013
Northern CA
|
Now here’s the real question. Will you be shooting any deer at 500+ yards? Is your equipment up to it, and are you up to it? Not inferring you are not, just asking that question. If the terrain you hunt and you and your equipment are up to it maybe worth changing. But if your shooting anywhere less than that distance the virtual minuscule difference in bullet drop would make it hard for me to change from a proven winner.. I love the TSX & TTSX btw. I have killed bucks just over 500 yards, and 400 yards is quit common. There are very few deer around here any more, and a lot of the country is wide open. If you can't shoot 400 ~ 500 yards you are going to miss a lot of opportunity. Same with coyotes, but those guys are a very small target at 500 yards!
Robert Martin
|
|
|
Re: Barnes LRX Long-Range Hunting Bullets
[Re: Yes sir]
#8154364
06/13/24 10:53 AM
06/13/24 10:53 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Northern CA
Robert Martin
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Mar 2013
Northern CA
|
I've shot a few deer with them. They shoot very well for a hunting bullet, usually the best or second best out of the different hunting bullets I've tried in my guns. They performed well on deer but it doesn't take much of a bullet to harvest a deer. My understanding after doing quite a bit of research the LRXs might be a bit more fragile in the nose section and might shear a petal off a bit easier than the TTSXs but I'm not too concerned with that as some makers actually design their bullets to break the pedals off, they believe it providers better terminal performance..??? The shank is going to hold together and punch through either way Thanks Yes sir, there was only 5 reviews on midway, and it looked like only 1 review actually tried them on deer. He said the did not expand at all, .25 cal. hole going in, and a .25 cal. hole going out, with little to no blood trail. I guess I'll chalk that up to an anomaly? For California legal bullets they are somewhat reasonable priced, so I guess I better try them.
Robert Martin
|
|
|
Re: Barnes LRX Long-Range Hunting Bullets
[Re: Ridge Runner1960]
#8154366
06/13/24 11:02 AM
06/13/24 11:02 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Northern CA
Robert Martin
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Mar 2013
Northern CA
|
If I were gonna go solid copper,, would try Hammer bullets first, read many, many good reports on them from very knowledgeable shooters. A lot of guys I know are using the Hammer bullets, they say they shoot great, I'm not sure how they do on game... BUT they are NOT recommended for rifles with a slower twist rate. My rifle is an old Savage model 110, (bought it when I was 14), it's a little beat up, but is still shoots good. I don't know the twist rate, but they tell me it is likely slow. But I'm going to ride the old savage horse as long as I can. I'm just trying to get her California legal. Long story short, all the guys shooting Hammer bullets say they may not work in my rifle.
Robert Martin
|
|
|
Re: Barnes LRX Long-Range Hunting Bullets
[Re: Robert Martin]
#8154370
06/13/24 11:20 AM
06/13/24 11:20 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Yes sir
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
|
I've shot a few deer with them. They shoot very well for a hunting bullet, usually the best or second best out of the different hunting bullets I've tried in my guns. They performed well on deer but it doesn't take much of a bullet to harvest a deer. My understanding after doing quite a bit of research the LRXs might be a bit more fragile in the nose section and might shear a petal off a bit easier than the TTSXs but I'm not too concerned with that as some makers actually design their bullets to break the pedals off, they believe it providers better terminal performance..??? The shank is going to hold together and punch through either way Thanks Yes sir, there was only 5 reviews on midway, and it looked like only 1 review actually tried them on deer. He said the did not expand at all, .25 cal. hole going in, and a .25 cal. hole going out, with little to no blood trail. I guess I'll chalk that up to an anomaly? For California legal bullets they are somewhat reasonable priced, so I guess I better try them. The .25 hole in and .25 hole out might be possible if shot at close range and really high velocity where there's a possibility of shearing all the petals off which is what the hammer bullet is designed to do and supposed kills very well. And if the shot was high lungs the bleeding could of just been filling up the lungs and/or the heart just stopped pumping blood immediately resulting in less blood. If this was the case I'm guessing the terminal performance was adequate enough no trailing was done.worked kind of like a fragmenting bullet but the shank stayed together and did exit.
|
|
|
Re: Barnes LRX Long-Range Hunting Bullets
[Re: Robert Martin]
#8158338
06/21/24 12:15 AM
06/21/24 12:15 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2023
MO
Crappiekiller
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2023
MO
|
I have seen very close range shots ( inside 50 yards) and high velocity 25 cal mono 101 gr E-tip explode on a 70-80 lb doe. It was ugly and I will not post pics. Rifle was a 25-284.
Most of my deer kills with s as 25 cal have been with the TSX or TTSX 100 gr. They have shown tremendous killing power and consistently perform as expected
CK
|
|
|
Re: Barnes LRX Long-Range Hunting Bullets
[Re: Robert Martin]
#8158421
06/21/24 08:32 AM
06/21/24 08:32 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
Shakeyjake
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
|
At Mach 3+, the SR 71s nose could reach 900F, ballistic tips soften up at 350F so at normal high power speeds, that things only good for looks in the magazine…lol. Unless Hornady and Skunk Works teamed up to develop a plastic to withstand those temps, I’m sticking with copper. But I guess with the tip gone, they still fly well. Having said that, I’ve never had problems dropping animals out to 250yds with ballistic tips in the past.
Last edited by Shakeyjake; 06/21/24 08:33 AM.
Wind Blew, crap flew, out came the line crew
|
|
|
Re: Barnes LRX Long-Range Hunting Bullets
[Re: Shakeyjake]
#8158483
06/21/24 10:07 AM
06/21/24 10:07 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
Providence Farm
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
|
At Mach 3+, the SR 71s nose could reach 900F, ballistic tips soften up at 350F so at normal high power speeds, that things only good for looks in the magazine…lol. Unless Hornady and Skunk Works teamed up to develop a plastic to withstand those temps, I’m sticking with copper. But I guess with the tip gone, they still fly well. Having said that, I’ve never had problems dropping animals out to 250yds with ballistic tips in the past. I'm sure they get soft but they don't disappear. If they can vanished I wouldn't find them inside the deer when cleaning and processing.
|
|
|
Re: Barnes LRX Long-Range Hunting Bullets
[Re: Robert Martin]
#8158490
06/21/24 10:37 AM
06/21/24 10:37 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Yes sir
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
|
If you really wanted to know what those tips do and if they melt during flight just totally remove some before you shoot them and see what your results are. My guess you see a big difference. My opinion is if they melted during flight and changed shape it would clearly show up in the ballistic coefficient on doppler radar.
Last edited by Yes sir; 06/21/24 10:38 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Barnes LRX Long-Range Hunting Bullets
[Re: Robert Martin]
#8158616
06/21/24 04:05 PM
06/21/24 04:05 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Trapper7
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
|
I only load Barnes bullets for elk and deer. I like their penetration qualities. Of the elk I've shot almost every bullet passed completely through. I was shooting a 300 WSM, 165 grain Barnes bullet TTSX. Most shots were from 75 yards to 250.
SIGN ON A FARMER'S FENCE: Do not cross this field unless you can do it in 9 seconds because the bull can do it in 10.
|
|
|
|
|