No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Donnersurvivor] #8261627
11/14/24 01:44 AM
11/14/24 01:44 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
S
ScottW Offline
trapper
ScottW  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
Then again, in some cases you get deals like AZ etc where trapping on some or all of the “public” land is prohibited. It’s definitely a double edged sword in some ways. Once a big corporation buys it, few if any will likely have access to recreate period. Happy trapping! ScottW

Re: Public land, new administration [Re: ScottW] #8261628
11/14/24 01:48 AM
11/14/24 01:48 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Vinke Offline
trapper
Vinke  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Originally Posted by ScottW
Then again, in some cases you get deals like AZ etc where trapping on some or all of the “public” land is prohibited. It’s definitely a double edged sword in some ways. Once a big corporation buys it, few if any will likely have access to recreate period. Happy trapping! ScottW


Were in az is it illegal to trap on state ground?

Didn't read the book in the previous post


Ant Man/ Marty 2028
just put your ear to the ground , and follow along

Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Donnersurvivor] #8261629
11/14/24 01:50 AM
11/14/24 01:50 AM
Joined: May 2010
MN
S
Steven 49er Offline
trapper
Steven 49er  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: May 2010
MN
Scott, while i agree that public land is a good thing but can there be too much of a good thing?

Many of these western states are a majority of public land. It inhibits growth, many say thats a good thing, well until it's their own growth that's inhibited.


"Gold is money, everything else is just credit" JP Morgan
Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Steven 49er] #8261630
11/14/24 01:54 AM
11/14/24 01:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Vinke Offline
trapper
Vinke  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Originally Posted by Steven 49er
Scott, while i agree that public land is a good thing but can there be too much of a good thing?

Many of these western states are a majority of public land. It inhibits growth, many say thats a good thing, well until it's their own growth that's inhibited.


Silly
Most state ground if the southern area is uninhabitable
No anything


Ant Man/ Marty 2028
just put your ear to the ground , and follow along

Re: Public land, new administration [Re: coytrpr] #8261631
11/14/24 01:55 AM
11/14/24 01:55 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
S
ScottW Offline
trapper
ScottW  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
Originally Posted by coytrpr
Having just come from a deer hunt on public land I have hunted for 46 years and used to trap for a living on I have to chime in. I'm a retired federal wildlife biologist with time spent with both the BLM and US Forest Service here in New Mexico. I was hired away from the Federal Wildlife Services program (Animal Damage Control then) by the BLM because as they put it, they needed a biologist who could work with the rural community to put habitat improvement projects on the ground. Before that I trapped for a living after having served in the military. I also helped my parents with farming in the Rio Grande valley. Point being, I am not anti-multiple use and I have a fair amount of agricultural background. My college degree was in wildlife with a minor in range science. Federal multiuse public lands are a rip-off for the American taxpayer. Mining law dates to 1872 with essentially no changes. Livestock producers pay $16.20 a YEAR for a cow and a calf up to 6 months to graze public lands managed by both the BLM and US Forest Service. Try feeding a cow on private land for that amount. I can show you ranch after ranch on public lands here in New Mexico where not only the pasture fences but the allotment boundary fences are non-functional. I just observed illegal bulk feeding activities on public lands that have seen less than 3" of rain all this year with no reduction in stocking. I watched cattle from observation points traveling over 3 miles in one direction trespassing into adjoining allotments to try to find feed. Most federal grazing permits and leases (there is a difference) are not held by family ranches. Many are used simply to shelter other income from taxes. Oil and gas are vital industries but you couldn't pay me to live in the Permian basin and the industry is devastating to huge swaths of land. The hunting community through organized conservation groups spends millions of dollars annually to mitigate damage caused by these industries on public lands. Public lands need to be inventoried for the highest value to the public areas and the rest traded or sold to consolidate ownership in those high public value areas. A priority should be given to consolidating public holdings in the East and Mid-West where public lands are scarce and the majority of the US population lives. The fact is that government land agencies both state and federal don't do their jobs under existing laws. I could go on but I won't. These are facts based on actual experience and observation of public lands. Both major political parties are jokes when it comes to public land issues. There are good people in all these industries but just like trappers they tolerate too many bad apples in the barrel.


Thanks for the ground level insight and input on this!

If the given land agencies actually did their jobs as required under existing laws would you feel very differently or still want the bulk of the lands sold?

I’m by no means as knowledgeable as you and many otherst in this, but I find it very interesting and enjoy learning the ins and outs when I can.

Happy trapping! ScottW

Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Vinke] #8261633
11/14/24 02:01 AM
11/14/24 02:01 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
S
ScottW Offline
trapper
ScottW  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
Originally Posted by Vinke
Originally Posted by ScottW
Then again, in some cases you get deals like AZ etc where trapping on some or all of the “public” land is prohibited. It’s definitely a double edged sword in some ways. Once a big corporation buys it, few if any will likely have access to recreate period. Happy trapping! ScottW


Were in az is it illegal to trap on state ground?

Didn't read the book in the previous post


Not sure Vinke. Considering I’ve never set foot in Arizona I have no firsthand experience, but seem to remember that was the big battle back in the 90’s where trapping on a good chunk of public land in AZ became illegal. I could be wrong! Happy trapping! ScottW

Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Donnersurvivor] #8261636
11/14/24 02:05 AM
11/14/24 02:05 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Vinke Offline
trapper
Vinke  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
OK
So you posted "stuff" you read on the internet, without fax.



Ant Man/ Marty 2028
just put your ear to the ground , and follow along

Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Donnersurvivor] #8261637
11/14/24 02:05 AM
11/14/24 02:05 AM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
It's our land not the governments .
If it is sold of it will be a land grab by our elect employees.
It's managed - miss managed by our employees.
Would you be happy if your employees sold of your land and took away your rights to use it???


Christ is King
Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Steven 49er] #8261638
11/14/24 02:06 AM
11/14/24 02:06 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
S
ScottW Offline
trapper
ScottW  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
Originally Posted by Steven 49er
Scott, while i agree that public land is a good thing but can there be too much of a good thing?

Many of these western states are a majority of public land. It inhibits growth, many say thats a good thing, well until it's their own growth that's inhibited.


True, but good chunks of it are relatively uninhabitable. Other pieces probably realistically don’t need a McMansion put out in the middle of the forest only to have to protect it from the fires we could just let burn. Not sure what the best answer is, but I tend to lean and say keep wild what we can as long as we can. Happy trapping! ScottW

Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Giant Sage] #8261639
11/14/24 02:10 AM
11/14/24 02:10 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Vinke Offline
trapper
Vinke  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
It's our land not the governments .
If it is sold of it will be a land grab by our elect employees.
It's managed - miss managed by our employees.
Would you be happy if your employees sold of your land and took away your rights to use it???


Have them sell it and then go look for a free place.to hunt and trap?


Ant Man/ Marty 2028
just put your ear to the ground , and follow along

Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Vinke] #8261641
11/14/24 02:12 AM
11/14/24 02:12 AM
Joined: May 2010
MN
S
Steven 49er Offline
trapper
Steven 49er  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: May 2010
MN
Originally Posted by Vinke
OK
So you posted "stuff" you read on the internet, without fax.



Scott, just to clear it up, a person cant use foothold traps on state land in AZ.

Can still use cage traps.


"Gold is money, everything else is just credit" JP Morgan
Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Vinke] #8261642
11/14/24 02:13 AM
11/14/24 02:13 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
S
ScottW Offline
trapper
ScottW  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
Originally Posted by Vinke
OK
So you posted "stuff" you read on the internet, without fax.



I was going off recollection so maybe I punched the wrong area code on my fax machine.

https://www.azleg.gov/ars/17/00301.htm#:~:text=It%20shall%20be%20unlawful%20to,the%20national%20park%20service%2C%20the

Not sure what the fax really are as I prefer to scan and email nowadays, but I gotta hit the hay and don’t feel like reading the Arizona reg book right now. Happy trapping! ScottW

Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Steven 49er] #8261643
11/14/24 02:15 AM
11/14/24 02:15 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
S
ScottW Offline
trapper
ScottW  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
Originally Posted by Steven 49er
Originally Posted by Vinke
OK
So you posted "stuff" you read on the internet, without fax.



Scott, just to clear it up, a person cant use foothold traps on state land in AZ.

Can still use cage traps.



That sounds about right. So I mis-spoke, but I’m not completely out of my mind…..yet! Happy trapping! ScottW

Last edited by ScottW; 11/14/24 02:15 AM.
Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Donnersurvivor] #8261644
11/14/24 02:18 AM
11/14/24 02:18 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
S
ScottW Offline
trapper
ScottW  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Dec 2006
Barnum, MN
Funny thing is, I bought several dozen Montgomery #2 round jaws from a fella in AZ back in the 90s who was getting out of it because of that. Going off my memory again, wanna say the name was Bill Goodwin. Happy trapping! ScottW

Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Donnersurvivor] #8261646
11/14/24 02:19 AM
11/14/24 02:19 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Vinke Offline
trapper
Vinke  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Conversational traps on reservation land with permission.


Ant Man/ Marty 2028
just put your ear to the ground , and follow along

Re: Public land, new administration [Re: ScottW] #8261648
11/14/24 02:25 AM
11/14/24 02:25 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Vinke Offline
trapper
Vinke  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Originally Posted by ScottW
Funny thing is, I bought several dozen Montgomery #2 round jaws from a fella in AZ back in the 90s who was getting out of it because of that. Going off my memory again, wanna say the name was Bill Goodwin. Happy trapping! ScottW


I remember a friend off mine,,,,,an old guy that did 100 cats in cages...
Times change....


Ant Man/ Marty 2028
just put your ear to the ground , and follow along

Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Donnersurvivor] #8261658
11/14/24 05:42 AM
11/14/24 05:42 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Online content
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Online Content
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
CO AZ NM CA Hunting and trapping both are a joke.


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Donnersurvivor] #8261667
11/14/24 06:37 AM
11/14/24 06:37 AM
Joined: Jan 2018
Henry Co, IL
3
3togo Offline
trapper
3togo  Offline
trapper
3

Joined: Jan 2018
Henry Co, IL
wytex is correct.

Randy Newburg had a podcast a couple weeks ago concerning this exact topic.

Utah, so far, is the prime offender. If the federal government sells/transfers land to a state it is then up to state government to decide how to use it. Usually gets sold for development.

Re: Public land, new administration [Re: 3togo] #8261730
11/14/24 08:35 AM
11/14/24 08:35 AM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by 3togo
wytex is correct.

Randy Newburg had a podcast a couple weeks ago concerning this exact topic.

Utah, so far, is the prime offender. If the federal government sells/transfers land to a state it is then up to state government to decide how to use it. Usually gets sold for development.

The state also becomes responsible for managing the land.
Mast states if any dont have the money to maintain it so it would more than likely be sold of.


Christ is King
Re: Public land, new administration [Re: Donnersurvivor] #8261733
11/14/24 08:36 AM
11/14/24 08:36 AM
Joined: Jan 2018
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Online sick OP
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Online Sick OP
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
MN
One of the biggest problems I've saw with developing parts of the Western U.S is the lack of water. There is limited amounts of water in large sections of the west, we can use it to water grazing cows for eternity or we can irrigate row crops for 20 years before its gone more less forever. Housing leads to the same problems, lack of water, fire hazards.

$16 and change is definitely a ridiculously low fee to charge for 6 months of grazing, if they would up that a bit they could afford a lot more good management, finding good Govt managers though seems like an impossible task.

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread