Re: No common sense fire fighting
[Re: jbyrd63]
#8315849
01/18/25 06:58 PM
01/18/25 06:58 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
central Haudenosaunee, the De...
white marlin
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
central Haudenosaunee, the De...
|
They can only fly 60 mph. There's no good reason to wait for the fire to start, before soaking the area, to prevent the fire.
Keith they may TRAVEL at 60 mph within their flight envelope, but they won't be sent aloft in 75 mph winds. so...soaking all of southern California before every potential wildfire. Dude!
|
|
|
Re: No common sense fire fighting
[Re: uplandpointer]
#8315897
01/18/25 07:20 PM
01/18/25 07:20 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2024
Alaska
AK Timber Tramp
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2024
Alaska
|
When the gates of (This word is unacceptable on Trapperman) open and the world is burning around you/us, does anyone actually think that they would stand there with a garden hose hooked to a sump pump drawing water out of the neighbors pool? I think not, It is easy for us keyboard warriors to say what we would do. I takes someone with a huge set to do that. I just pray that people were able to grab a few important things before they had to run. I've actually seen more people do that than what you would think during my firefighting career. Wildland and structure fire both have their frustrating people to deal with. On the wildland side it's usually salty land owners that don't want fire crews on/near their land (even though we're there to help). On the structure side...let's just say you definitely have to clarify what they mean when they say "my baby is in there!"... I've run into more than one compromised structure looking for an infant that turned out to be a dog, cat, or one time a ferret. That'll make you wanna hurt someone lol
|
|
|
Re: No common sense fire fighting
[Re: upstateNY]
#8315907
01/18/25 07:27 PM
01/18/25 07:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
MN
160user
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
MN
|
Sprinkler systems work good to save trap cabins in the middle of the bush when a forest fire whips thru.
You have sprinkler systems installed in your "Bush" cabins up there? After the big "Blow Down" event on the Superior NF 25 years ago, many/most home owners and cabin owners installed sprinkler systems on the homes and out buildings power by propane pumps. When we had the Ham Lake fire, these sprinklers worked great due to essentially unlimited water from the lakes. The problem was the propane pumps were hooked to 20 pound tanks and only lasted a few hours. We spent 36 hours taking tanks from where the fire had already passed and moving them to ones the fire hadn't reached yet. We did find a few 100 pound tanks and they were gold!
I have nothing clever to put here.
|
|
|
Re: No common sense fire fighting
[Re: jbyrd63]
#8316293
01/19/25 12:21 AM
01/19/25 12:21 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
james bay frontierOnt.
Boco
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2011
james bay frontierOnt.
|
From what I understand,rich people lost homes worth millions. You would think they would be smart enough to have a fire suppression system installed at those places in an area known for frequent wildfires.Instead of waiting for some city employee to show up to save your values. Like I said it can only be attributable to the dumbing down of that particular society.
Last edited by Boco; 01/19/25 12:23 AM.
Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
|
|
|
Re: No common sense fire fighting
[Re: white marlin]
#8316307
01/19/25 12:45 AM
01/19/25 12:45 AM
|
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
KeithC
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
|
They can only fly 60 mph. There's no good reason to wait for the fire to start, before soaking the area, to prevent the fire.
Keith they may TRAVEL at 60 mph within their flight envelope, but they won't be sent aloft in 75 mph winds. so...soaking all of southern California before every potential wildfire. Dude! I never suggested soaking all of Southern California at all. Where did you get that from? They could create barriers in high risk areas. There's no need to soak everything. Those hills channel wind in very specific ways. Wind flows in currents, not 1 continuous mass. Wind currents can run in totally different directions at different elevations. Birds are capable of finding a wind current going the way they want. People can easily do the same using equipment. Keith
|
|
|
Re: No common sense fire fighting
[Re: jbyrd63]
#8316333
01/19/25 01:17 AM
01/19/25 01:17 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
ohio
Ohio Wolverine
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Apr 2007
ohio
|
There's more going on in California than they let us know! We can't be sure about anything yet! Except they more than likely caused their own problems!
We have met the enemy and the enemy is us!
|
|
|
Re: No common sense fire fighting
[Re: jbyrd63]
#8316470
01/19/25 09:23 AM
01/19/25 09:23 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
Shakeyjake
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
|
They needed some farmers to help them out, they pump their lagoons for miles through 1-2’ tough hoses, huge pumps that are made for pumping ugly stuff. Sure, salt water will be hard on everything, but what’s the alternative? Buy a new pump and have 2 on the beach as standby. As for winds. Lots of fuel and high winds…..game over, Mother Natures in charge. Ohh, on another note, are the fish OK? That’s what really matters anyways.
Last edited by Shakeyjake; 01/19/25 09:24 AM.
Wind Blew, crap flew, out came the line crew
|
|
|
Re: No common sense fire fighting
[Re: jbyrd63]
#8316478
01/19/25 09:29 AM
01/19/25 09:29 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
danny clifton
"Grumpy Old Man"
|
"Grumpy Old Man"
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
|
Bad fires every year year in CA. Hurricanes in coastal areas. Tornado prone areas. Floods in river plains. All uncontrollable by humans. You would think folks would have a plan for recovery.
Last edited by danny clifton; 01/19/25 09:29 AM.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
|
|
|
Re: No common sense fire fighting
[Re: jbyrd63]
#8316494
01/19/25 09:49 AM
01/19/25 09:49 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
|
Complete lack of common sense with the liberal leadership, spending their money on vanity projects instead of what needed done.
Just watched a guy who saved his and a couple of his neighbors houses In the middle of Altadena with buckets and water from swimming pools. His exact words......
"there was no water in the hydrants when the fire broke out"
There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
|
|
|
Re: No common sense fire fighting
[Re: Rat Masterson]
#8316580
01/19/25 11:36 AM
01/19/25 11:36 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2023
MO
BC-Buck
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2023
MO
|
. The L A fire dept. budget is only 900 million, so I could see how they wouldn't have the resources, to be proactive They retire at early 50s with 90% of pay and benifets over $260k.
|
|
|
Re: No common sense fire fighting
[Re: jbyrd63]
#8316594
01/19/25 12:00 PM
01/19/25 12:00 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
james bay frontierOnt.
Boco
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2011
james bay frontierOnt.
|
The weird thing is it was just a small fire. It only burned 62 sq miles apparently and not one big fire but 3 or 4 spot fires.Should have been handled relatively easily if they had some resources ready for a fire. For perspective,62 sq miles is less than 1/4 of a small RTL We have fires way bigger here on a regular basis but there are assets available when values need protecting.many forest fires burn 10-20 times the size area of that little fire. That fire should have had enough resources thrown at it to snuff it in the bud with the amount of values in that area. Feel sorry for those who lost their lives,Some accountability is in order I would think.
Last edited by Boco; 01/19/25 12:07 PM.
Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
|
|
|
Re: No common sense fire fighting
[Re: Boco]
#8316603
01/19/25 12:05 PM
01/19/25 12:05 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2023
MO
BC-Buck
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2023
MO
|
The weird thing is it was just a small fire. It only burned 62 sq miles apparently and not one big fire but 3 or 4 spot fires.Should have been handled relatively easily if they had some resources ready for a fire. For perspective,62 sq miles is less than 1/4 of a small RTL We have fires way bigger here on a regular basis but there are assets available when values need protecting.many forest fires burn 10-20 times the size area of that little fire. That fire should have had enough resources thrown at it to snuff it in the bud with the amount of values in that area.
That fuel load should have been addressed years ago.
|
|
|
|
|