|
Re: So how can this not work
[Re: Wolfdog91]
#8360233
03/08/25 11:39 AM
03/08/25 11:39 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 22,553 The Hill Country of Texas
Leftlane
"HOSS"
|
"HOSS"
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 22,553
The Hill Country of Texas
|
I'm with Osagan elevate the tank. I also agree with the bigger storage capacity guys and Bryce in regards to protecting it. Cattle like to rub and scratch on anything you build.
When I first got divorced I lived in a bunkhouse that was fed water off of the covered arena. All the stalls and stock tanks were fed from it too as it had about 6000 sf of roof.
�What�s good for me may not be good for the weak minded.� Captain Gus McCrae- Texas Rangers
|
|
|
Re: So how can this not work
[Re: Wolfdog91]
#8360359
03/08/25 03:20 PM
03/08/25 03:20 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 22,684 St. Louis Co, Mo
BigBob
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 22,684
St. Louis Co, Mo
|
So what are the problems with this ? IMHO: Nice idea. I agree with the gutter screen idea. You would need to raise the barrel so the outlet is level with the desired tank level and add a 2nd, 1 IBC tank is double the capacity of 2 barrels. Raise the fill level inlet as high as you can to maximize volume. Maybe put some minnows in the tank for fishing, and mosquito control.
Every kid needs a Dog and a Curmudgeon.
Remember Bowe Bergdahl, the traitor.
Beware! Jill Pudlewski, Ron Oates and Keven Begesse are liars and thiefs!
|
|
|
Re: So how can this not work
[Re: Wolfdog91]
#8360380
03/08/25 03:50 PM
03/08/25 03:50 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,878 Missouri
HayDay
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,878
Missouri
|
When I was kicking this idea around for use in a home..........in addition to the leaves, it occurred to me that gutters would also carry dust off the roof and gutter. So I thought it might help to use a sediment trap in the downspout. A foot or so below the gutter, put in a big T fitting. In the straight line below the T, start putting in a series of reducers, so final drain would be 3/4 inch or so. First flush off the roof and out the gutter with dust would flow down into the sediment trap. But necked down like that, would quickly back up to the T, then take alternate, wide open big pipe down to the storage tank. The sediment trap would be self flushing.
Easy to vote your way into socialism, but impossible to vote your way out of it.
|
|
|
Re: So how can this not work
[Re: HayDay]
#8360430
03/08/25 06:10 PM
03/08/25 06:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 27,538 Georgia
warrior
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 27,538
Georgia
|
As previously noted, as shown, only part of the water in the barrel would flow to the tank. Once the water levels are equal, valve would stay open and water levels in barrel and tank would drop to level of the connecting pipe, then livestock would drain the tank dry. So bigger tank and connector lower.....maybe underground.
General concept is not new. Many farm houses had a cistern.....a big underground tank......that was used to catch rain water off roofs. Many of those even used for drinking water. Pulled up by a hand pump. Used in place of, or in addition to, a dug well.
Have thought the concept could also be used in all homes, catching rain water to be used for flushing toilets, watering plants, gardens and such. Tank would have to be big and tall, but concept is doable. I've toured a few antebellum big houses that had such systems. One memorable one is the Jemison House in Tuscaloosa that was barely completed before the war broke out. It had indoor running water for flushing toilets and bath tub. Roof catch to in ground cistern. Servant powered hand pump to in attic tank for indoor plumbing. State of the art for the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|