Wilderness Trapping and Living


No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers *** No Politics
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum


~Dobbins' Catalog~

ATS
(Please support Ted's Fur Shed, our sponsor for the Wilderness Page)


Alaska Trappers Association

Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: #9 [Re: milkcrate] #8359651
03/07/25 12:33 PM
03/07/25 12:33 PM
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 2,517
Interior Alaska
O
Oh Snap Offline
trapper
Oh Snap  Offline
trapper
O

Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 2,517
Interior Alaska
Good to see your handle on TM Dave. Good information also, THANKS!


I love the smell of burning spruce---I love the sound of a spring time goose---I love the feel of 40 below---from my trapline I will never go!
Re: #9 [Re: Oh Snap] #8359778
03/07/25 05:15 PM
03/07/25 05:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 19
Tonsina, Alaska
Wolverinebait Online content
trapper
Wolverinebait  Online Content
trapper

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 19
Tonsina, Alaska
Hey Larry,... long time no see. Yeah, I can't trap like I used to anymore either, but I still poke around now & then on TM just to see what's happening.

One thing I forgot to mention that took place when Dean had the Alaskan #9 trap business, is that he/we looked into making a 2nd model of the trap, which would have been called the "Alaskan #7", exactly like the #9, only with a 7" jaw-spread instead of 9". The point of this was to make an ultimate wolverine trap, and yet would still be big enough for wolves too. It would have had a double-jaw design of some sort, to keep a wolverine from getting his mouth underneath the jaws,... something similar to what I did to some of my #4 coils (picture). But it never happened, because when it was all said & done, building an Alaskan #7 would only have been a few bucks less than what it took to make the #9,... and we both agreed that not too many trappers would be willing to shell out $100 for a wolverine trap,... or even had wolverine numbers that would justify buying it. And now the way that the wolverine markets have developed with taxidermists, skull collectors, etc, body-grippers are really the best way to go, because catching a wolverine by the foot, even if you can keep his mouth from getting under the jaws, still leaves the trapper with a wolverine that only has long sharp claws on one foot, and a lot more chipped teeth. But, it still would have been fun to have had built a couple just to test and seen how they would have worked.[Linked Image]

Last edited by Wolverinebait; 03/07/25 05:17 PM. Reason: forgot picture

"I'm sorry for hurting your feelings when I called you stupid,... I thought you already knew,..."
Re: #9 [Re: milkcrate] #8360232
03/08/25 11:35 AM
03/08/25 11:35 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,527
Fairbanks, Alaska
Pete in Frbks Offline
trapper
Pete in Frbks  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,527
Fairbanks, Alaska
That is a very interesting story from the "R & D" section!

My favorite wolverine trap for years was the NH 114, but the large space under the jaws led to chewing problems as Dave describes. Not much of an issue for the fur trade, but certainly a major consideration for the taxidermy market.

My solution was to search around, find and buy, a dozen NH 48's. MUCH less space under the jaws. For the most part, it solved the problem for me (at least until I caved in and began using 330's!) For those not familiar with 48's, they are basically a NH #4 with teeth. Originally manufactured as a premium beaver trap.

I would agree though, that finding a dozen #48's is NOT easy! I treasure mine!

Pete

Re: #9 [Re: Pete in Frbks] #8360349
03/08/25 02:46 PM
03/08/25 02:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 1,092
Alaska
A
AK Timber Tramp Offline
trapper
AK Timber Tramp  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 1,092
Alaska
Originally Posted by Pete in Frbks
That is a very interesting story from the "R & D" section!

My favorite wolverine trap for years was the NH 114, but the large space under the jaws led to chewing problems as Dave describes. Not much of an issue for the fur trade, but certainly a major consideration for the taxidermy market.

My solution was to search around, find and buy, a dozen NH 48's. MUCH less space under the jaws. For the most part, it solved the problem for me (at least until I caved in and began using 330's!) For those not familiar with 48's, they are basically a NH #4 with teeth. Originally manufactured as a premium beaver trap.

I would agree though, that finding a dozen #48's is NOT easy! I treasure mine!

Pete

A dozen would be a gold mine, I never find more than a couple at a time. And they're always a little overpriced too. I'd like to have more someday

Re: #9 [Re: Wolverinebait] #8360647
03/09/25 02:32 AM
03/09/25 02:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,960
49th State
M
mad_mike Offline
trapper
mad_mike  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,960
49th State
Originally Posted by Wolverinebait
Hey Larry,... long time no see. Yeah, I can't trap like I used to anymore either, but I still poke around now & then on TM just to see what's happening.

One thing I forgot to mention that took place when Dean had the Alaskan #9 trap business, is that he/we looked into making a 2nd model of the trap, which would have been called the "Alaskan #7", exactly like the #9, only with a 7" jaw-spread instead of 9". The point of this was to make an ultimate wolverine trap, and yet would still be big enough for wolves too. It would have had a double-jaw design of some sort, to keep a wolverine from getting his mouth underneath the jaws,... something similar to what I did to some of my #4 coils (picture). But it never happened, because when it was all said & done, building an Alaskan #7 would only have been a few bucks less than what it took to make the #9,... and we both agreed that not too many trappers would be willing to shell out $100 for a wolverine trap,... or even had wolverine numbers that would justify buying it. And now the way that the wolverine markets have developed with taxidermists, skull collectors, etc, body-grippers are really the best way to go, because catching a wolverine by the foot, even if you can keep his mouth from getting under the jaws, still leaves the trapper with a wolverine that only has long sharp claws on one foot, and a lot more chipped teeth. But, it still would have been fun to have had built a couple just to test and seen how they would have worked.[Linked Image]

Originally Posted by Wolverinebait
Hey Larry,... long time no see. Yeah, I can't trap like I used to anymore either, but I still poke around now & then on TM just to see what's happening.

One thing I forgot to mention that took place when Dean had the Alaskan #9 trap business, is that he/we looked into making a 2nd model of the trap, which would have been called the "Alaskan #7", exactly like the #9, only with a 7" jaw-spread instead of 9". The point of this was to make an ultimate wolverine trap, and yet would still be big enough for wolves too. It would have had a double-jaw design of some sort, to keep a wolverine from getting his mouth underneath the jaws,... something similar to what I did to some of my #4 coils (picture). But it never happened, because when it was all said & done, building an Alaskan #7 would only have been a few bucks less than what it took to make the #9,... and we both agreed that not too many trappers would be willing to shell out $100 for a wolverine trap,... or even had wolverine numbers that would justify buying it. And now the way that the wolverine markets have developed with taxidermists, skull collectors, etc, body-grippers are really the best way to go, because catching a wolverine by the foot, even if you can keep his mouth from getting under the jaws, still leaves the trapper with a wolverine that only has long sharp claws on one foot, and a lot more chipped teeth. But, it still would have been fun to have had built a couple just to test and seen how they would have worked.[Linked Image]

Beautiful foot catch.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

Moderated by  akntrpr, Ol' Blister, otterman 

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1