Not at the rate they are responding to their flawed product.

Well, it only took a couple discharges to do Remington in.

Guess I should frame mine or something

Just reinforces my old school belief in the need for on/off switchs on self loading handguns.

Loved my P220 carried it for years never had a failure it seems quality control has fallen apart with many companies today that had high standards in the past. The first P220 they issued me was broken the second on was great 2 of the 4 we bought were replaced.

I have a 320 full size as well as the 320 compact frame for the action. When I first purchased prior to buying we ran the serial number thru sig to see if it was on recall and it wasn't. Now I say to myself Hum do I sell do I keep I only use the gun for target but I would love to see sigs feedback on this

From what I've seen online of 320s going click from all sorts of contact other than the trigger I'd be going for full refund or melt down.

I most certainly would allow a 320 and live ammo to be under the same roof.

you should definitely unload it or go condition 3


as for will they make it as a company , that is a really big Maybe

the 220 is a DA/SA hammer fired gun , very different beast.


the 320 M17 M18 borrow heavily form the P250 but make it modular

it never actually finished it's trials it was fast tracked because it was the only modular gun and DOD wanted a modular gun.

it is a PRE c oc ked striker meaning it is like a hammer that is back but for the 5 safeties it claims to have it all hinges on the sear so it actually has ZERO safeties if one single point of failure causes it to discharge without being (commanded)

makes me question buying a 365. probably different function but do I want to support a company hiding a problem and will theu be around in the future

Love my 365X and my wife loves her 365. Been carrying AIWB almost daily for five years. I trust it.

I haven't looked into the 320 issues yet, don't own one.

Honestly this is is pretty much for the P320, something about cutting corners on the trigger mechanism.

Funny deal , the only reason they won the contract instead of Glock is because Glock refused to put a mainly safety on there's .... But the fact sign has and more problems in a few years vs Glock in the last decade or more....yeaaaahhh

I have had my P320 for many years and haven't experienced any issues as of yet.

I haven't heard of any issues with the 365 or any other SIG model. Looks like SIG got fast tracked by big army on the 320 and fielded a flawed product and by the time it came to light too many power players in the boardrooms and commands were too deeply invested personally and careerwise to not fully back it. Now with an actual death of a servicemember, injuries to LEOs and multiple agencies state and federal banning their use it has to be dealt with and it won't be pretty.

When one considers the military's move to the Sig P320......followed by a move to a new and improved Sig rifle in a new and improved caliber that Sig likely has patents on..........one could be forgiven for thinking the selection of weapons systems might be rigged in favor of Sig. As in a lot of folks bought off. Stranger things have happened.

You dont say, never would've thought of that.