No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8451474
8 hours ago
8 hours ago
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
P
Providence Farm Offline
trapper
Providence Farm  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
243/6mm, 7mm08/7mm 308 7.62 all great rounds classics by all accounts.

but 6.5 is bad.. well except in a 6.5 sweed. at the same velocity or less than the 6.5 creedmoor That is balisticaly identical to my 260 Remington I had built before the creedmoor came out.

So unless you don't think a 243 is enough or a 7mm-08 at the same speed and cross over in bullet weight people should realize how fullish thay sound bad mouthing the 6.5 creedmoor. Bash the terrible/cringe but also great marketing that worked. But it's a fine efective round

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: HayDay] #8451475
8 hours ago
8 hours ago
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
pa
Originally Posted by HayDay
One of worst developments in shooting sports I can think of is advent of the long range shooting game. One thing to pop paper plates at 1,000 yards with 6.5 Creedmoor. Another to take down a deer with same rifle at that range, which has led to well founded concerns. Lot of gut shot and otherwise crippled deer have wandered off to slow deaths. Rifle isn't the problem. Knucklehead holding the rifle is.

I know of one internet xpert who has made a name for himself in game of long distance hunting..........say out to 800 yards or so. It's not with a CM.......more like 300 Win mag or 7mm RUM. It takes a pretty big cannon to put enough energy downrange to do significant damage. Too many guys seem to be unaware of that.


Absolutely a miniscule amount of crippled deer to "long range" hunters compared to bow hunters and regular goobers with their 30-30 they shoot once a year.

I'm with ya on the big gun part tho. All the guys I know that shoot deer long range use bigger stuff, so judging them all from a few internet guys isn't accurate either.


Last edited by hippie; 8 hours ago.

There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8451482
8 hours ago
8 hours ago
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
P
Providence Farm Offline
trapper
Providence Farm  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
In my area most deer are shoot under 70 yards. Furthest I have was 302 with a smokeless muzzleloader. Only becuse I had been playing at that distance on my cousins range while being layed uo on a walker and becuse I was on a walker I was not really hunting just sitting 20 yards from my truck basically waiting on my Brother in law to get done hunting where I told him to go while he was home waiting to ship out to Afghanistan.

Deer were about 50 yards I didn't see them untill the ran off when I stood up . The stiped on a hill that made a great backstop. Doe droped and is the only deer I have seen drop in a scope. Brother in law got a nice 13 point that night as well.

If i lived out west or where longer shots were possible and common I'm sure that would be different. Where and how people hunt are all different.

Last edited by Providence Farm; 5 hours ago.
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8451508
6 hours ago
6 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2008
eastern WV
R
Ridge Runner1960 Offline
trapper
Ridge Runner1960  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Dec 2008
eastern WV
I use a 6.5 Gibbs for the most part,, though I also have a 270 weatherby, a 7mm STW, a 7mm Allen Mag,, and a 338 Edge. The creedmoor does well to 600 yards the gibbs to 1100 (its parent case is the 270 winchester.

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8451557
4 hours ago
4 hours ago
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
There are some minor advantages to some of the newer cartridges but for hunting and the vast majority of hunters they aren't going to make any difference. Most of the newer cartridges come in factory guns with tighter tolerance chambers, faster twist barrels and slightly more efficient cases. Mostly the very slight advantages are geared towards target shooting and those who shoot a lot. Most of it is just cool factor.

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8451569
4 hours ago
4 hours ago
Joined: Jan 2008
Alaska and Washington State
W
waggler Offline
trapper
waggler  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Jan 2008
Alaska and Washington State
imo, 95% of the "advances" in cartridged ammo in the past 30 years is nothing more than a collaboration between marketing folks and outdoor writers.


"My life is better than your vacation"
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: waggler] #8451593
2 hours ago
2 hours ago
Joined: Feb 2009
Hill City,Mn.
R
Rally Offline
trapper
Rally  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Feb 2009
Hill City,Mn.
Originally Posted by waggler
imo, 95% of the "advances" in cartridged ammo in the past 30 years is nothing more than a collaboration between marketing folks and outdoor writers.

Yep! One hole in, one hole out.


Keep your boots dry
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread