No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450588
Yesterday at 09:08 PM
Yesterday at 09:08 PM
Joined: May 2013
Holmes Co. Ohio
K
Killbuck Offline OP
trapper
Killbuck  Offline OP
trapper
K

Joined: May 2013
Holmes Co. Ohio
Then don't use brass!

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450596
Yesterday at 09:16 PM
Yesterday at 09:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
warrior Offline
trapper
warrior  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
Originally Posted by Killbuck
Then don't use brass!


Steel works as russian ammo shows but it comes with issues like not flexing, shrinking once fired, leading to cases more or less stuck in the chamber. The new 6.8 case uses a two part steel head brass cylinder front mechanically locked together to get around the high pressure steel case problem. But it's not an easy or inexpensive fix. And the new 6.8 rifle is showing some teething issues in the field now.

Caseless or telescoping may be a thing but you still have the whole how to seal the pressure vessel that brass currently does. The brass case is essentially a gasket on a piston head.


[Linked Image]
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Providence Farm] #8450601
Yesterday at 09:18 PM
Yesterday at 09:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
warrior Offline
trapper
warrior  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
Originally Posted by Providence Farm
Originally Posted by Killbuck
I'm talking about new technology, not just stuffing more powder in a case. Same old brass case, barrel steel etc. Its been more than 50 years. $$ is no object. Lots of 5000.00 dollar rifles with 4000.00 thermal scopes.


Portable power supply and batteries are limited for man portable lazers as far as I have seen. But it's not science I follow closely.

A light saber sounds fun untill you remember how often you cut yourself with your pocket knife.


That portable power thing is the hold up on the electromagnetic propulsion guns. That tech has already shown the potential to surpass conventional powder driven velocities.


[Linked Image]
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450607
Yesterday at 09:22 PM
Yesterday at 09:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Online content
trapper
Yes sir  Online Content
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
I think the main reason for not higher velocities is it gains u so little for the troubles it brings. Though there are people working on it. Just look at the calibers u mentioned, they haven't exactly caught on despite their speed.

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450612
Yesterday at 09:25 PM
Yesterday at 09:25 PM
Joined: May 2013
Holmes Co. Ohio
K
Killbuck Offline OP
trapper
Killbuck  Offline OP
trapper
K

Joined: May 2013
Holmes Co. Ohio
I have a Savage 110ML that uses smokeless powder in a muzzleloader. No case. Approaching 375 H&H ballistics.

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450633
Yesterday at 09:52 PM
Yesterday at 09:52 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Amite county Mississippi
Wolfdog91 Offline
trapper
Wolfdog91  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2013
Amite county Mississippi
Imo it gets to the point where there just not much point in higher velocity. Can get my 17-5.56 kak up to 5k with a 15.5 GR bullet but why ? Lower brass life , lower barrel life ect.

The ELR and UELR guys are doing. Some really cool stuff but there to the point where it's basically man portable artillery.

Now on a side notw these a few guys taking the .277 furry bi metal case and rednecking them and doing some ...very interesting things swore I saw one guy running a .243 at close to 4500fps but...


YouTube expert
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450653
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
warrior Offline
trapper
warrior  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
Originally Posted by Killbuck
I have a Savage 110ML that uses smokeless powder in a muzzleloader. No case. Approaching 375 H&H ballistics.


It's a more or less, minus the flash hole, a sealed vessel. The flash hole has a brass cap/primer and iirc that one is an inline locking bolt for a more positive stop on the primer.

Standard rifles are unsealed with the chamber. The brass case, supported by a locked bolt, functions as a sealing gasket.

Caseless ammo would require some sort of sealed vessel and steel on steel has always been problematic at getting a complete seal. It can be done as the big 16" rifles on the battleships were essentially caseless with just powder and shell.


[Linked Image]
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450781
1 hour ago
1 hour ago
Joined: Dec 2006
Rodney,Ohio
SNIPERBBB Online happy
trapper
SNIPERBBB  Online Happy
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Rodney,Ohio
Other problem with the 5k+ is you probably won't see it legalized for hunting outside of out west.

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread