fair enough.

but nothing will be done about it...the pardon will stand.

wish it weren't so, but...

I can’t believe Fauci melted those glaciers. Wish he wouldn’t have gotten a pardon for it.

shouldn't you be cleaning a Panama or something?

Lol got disoriented from the endless rows of red pine

That is to be expected, melting more or less increases exponetialy as the mass shrinks.

true

I am so tired of people calling global warming cooling change a man made problem.

I always ask what caused the end of the previous ice age to this one?

Global warming!!

What ended the warming of the planet previous to this ice age?

Global cooling!!

I have yet to see any "Scientists" names and findings and funding.

Up until very recently “rigorous skepticism” was an extremely important part of science

That seems to have been lost,,,,,on the sheep

It still is. Unless you have been politically brainwashed by your favorite party you would have to have sturdy blinders on not to see that the greenhouse gases are heating up the planet faster than can be explained by anything other than our burning of fossil fuels. Every legit scientific organization on the globe sees it that way. I've read up on it pretty good and it all makes sense.

My guess is that nobody that on here that thinks it is a hoax even bothers to look at the evidence. Your mind is made up.

Of course, if you don't understand what a 2-3 degree warming of the ocean will mean over the next hundred years or so all of this will be lost on you...so go on and make fun of the "hoax". As Savell likes to say, "carry on". LOL

If you read up on it a bit more you’ld learn that there are glaciers on the planet that are actually expanding

Ice packs that are growing

And coral reefs that are healthy and thriving

the thing is: your side hasn't considered all of the OTHER possibilities that COULD be causing it.

I've named at least two that haven't been considered at all!

a correlation in time is not proof of a scientific cause and effect relationship. Period. Full Stop.

https://towardsdatascience.com/4-reasons-why-correlation-does-not-imply-causation-f202f69fe979/

Your arguments are getting worse and this whole thing was re hashed dancing on the graves of some climbers. To fully label it all anthropogenic is extremely short sighted

That will continue to allude him. Along with all his charts and grafts starting on different years to appear to show what they claim. But if you pull up the charts and look back further it shows the opposite.

Man must have been responsible for the warming and cooling cycles from the last ice ages and warm periods following. But you won't ever get any explanation on that.

All I can say is your guys view on this is a fringe minority view. You must be waaaay smarter than the rest of the world.

correlation, my friend. got anything else? or is that it?

A Google AI overview. Now there's a reliable source. LOL

Confirmation bias.

Is man releasing more CO2 than would otherwise be present? Is CO2 a greenhouse gas?
Irrefutable yes to both.

Is man all to blame, or is it significant enough to even matter in the long run?
That’s impossible to answer.

And still , nobody on here can tell me how much the globe has warmed......bla bla bla


Hoax.....yep

I truly love the irony of a lefty calling others brainwashed. That in itself is all I need to hear to completely dismiss any further discussion. I will listen and chuckle, but until one sees the light they will continue to tread in darkness, never knowing anything else. Sad but true in many cases. Of course I’m sure BP was very skeptical of the Rona, Russiagate, Benghazi, Hunters fabulous paintings, Pelosis’s stock market expertise, pallets of cash to Iran, planes of illegals dropped off across the USA under the cover of darkness……. But I’m branded brainwashed….LOL. BP I’m sure you are a fine man, and you and I would have great conversations about our love of the outdoors and trapping, but let’s make a pledge to not bring up theories.

You need to be more specific about what location, and what timeframe.

But if the answer is different than what you believe, you’ll just say it’s fake news, so what’s the point?

Confirmation bias.