I believe we should all have guns , government getting into picking and choosing who is where government gets into trouble and unconstitutional begins.

Blatantly unconstitutional.

Congress makes law, not the executive.

The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution.
That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.

It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.

If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?

(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)


Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.

Blatantly unconstitutional.

Congress makes law, not the executive.

The law says one must have been adjudicated mentally defective (by a judge) or committed to a mental institution.
That clearly cannot be willy-nilly applied to a whole class of people. Congress is, of course, free to change the law if they want. But then they'd be on the record as being anti 2a, so they won't.

It doesn't matter if tranny behavior is labeled as a mental illness. That's not how the law works. You can be bipolar, for example, and still purchase a gun, as long as you haven't been adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution. Simply having a mental illness doesn't disqualify someone from owning a gun under current law.

If the executive can just declare that an entire group of people's can't own guns....how do you think that'll go next time a Democrat is in office?

(None of this should be a surprise, of course, coming from the president that's on camera talking about wanting to take guns first and go through due process second, while sitting right next to his AG.)


Now go ahead and tell me how supporting the 2a=TDS.

I am a Marine Corps veteran, a range coach, and a hunting guide. I’m about as pro-2A as a guy can be. The idea that anyone who opposes or thinks that the current president is garbage has “TDS” or whatever other nonsense you want to call it is just crazy to me. It’s even crazier how many grown adults have decided to act like children by being generally mean, if not downright hateful, just to “own the libs”. Do you even know any of these “libs” or are you just being a jerk?

Congress makes law, not the executive.

True, but is the criteria regarding mental health reflected in the questions on the ATF form 4473 law actually passed by congress or is it regulation crafted by BATFE? Perhaps you know but I don't. If it is just regulation Trump can drive a change providing it doesn't conflict with the law. In any case, what Trump has done is keep focus on how mental health screening is being done in the NICS process. I see that as a good thing because the current process is obviously not working to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill intent on murder.

I am a Marine Corps veteran, a range coach, and a hunting guide. I’m about as pro-2A as a guy can be. The idea that anyone who opposes or thinks that the current president is garbage has “TDS” or whatever other nonsense you want to call it is just crazy to me. It’s even crazier how many grown adults have decided to act like children by being generally mean, if not downright hateful, just to “own the libs”. Do you even know any of these “libs” or are you just being a jerk?

Don't buy into what it looks like you are.

The point isn't what I a may or may not be "buying in to," but rather that the NICS process isn't working as intended with regard to mental health issues. The recent violence by trans (Audrey Hale, Robert Westman, etc) are just examples, the 2009 Fort Hood shooter, Nidal Hisan, is another. The process needs a hard look and hopefully with get it.

Not saying I agree or disagree with the idea, HOWEVER, it could open up a Pandoras box that results in other mental disorders to being banned from gun ownership.
Not saying trannyism is or is not a mental Disorder ,at least not here, what happens when they say anxiety is a mental disorder, or a phobia is a mental disorder, snakes, heights, crowds, or when they say anyone with PTSD is mentally unstable and should be banned from gun ownership? How many vets, police, or other first responders that suffer from PTSD are suddenly banned from gun ownership? Where will it stop?