No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486627
Yesterday at 07:55 PM
Yesterday at 07:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
MI
T
trappingthomas Offline
trapper
trappingthomas  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MI
seriously? Feeling like I am trying to argue with my leftist dad. Never asked me my experience. prob. because of you cute clips of a carnivore stronger than you licking a human baby! please idiot!

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486628
Yesterday at 07:55 PM
Yesterday at 07:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Offline
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
MN
I have a 0% chance of being attacked by a shark due to my proximity of them.

I'm thankful my neighbors don't have pits so that they are also not likely to cause me trouble.

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486629
Yesterday at 07:56 PM
Yesterday at 07:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
MI
T
trappingthomas Offline
trapper
trappingthomas  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MI
Seriously idiot! Just to make sure it was clear!

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486630
Yesterday at 07:56 PM
Yesterday at 07:56 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
IL
H
houndone Offline
trapper
houndone  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Mar 2013
IL
Ive got a friend that has had them for years and he's had some that turned and bit him and his granddaughter hasn't learned his lesson as he's still got 2.

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486636
Yesterday at 08:02 PM
Yesterday at 08:02 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Iowa
~ADC~ Offline
The Count
~ADC~  Offline
The Count

Joined: Jun 2010
Iowa
What has 4 legs and one arm?

Re: Pitbulls [Re: trapdog1] #8486642
Yesterday at 08:08 PM
Yesterday at 08:08 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
pa
Originally Posted by trapdog1
One fact you can't Google: pitbull owners that claim their dogs would "never hurt a fly" are dumb arses.


X2


There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
Re: Pitbulls [Re: ~ADC~] #8486643
Yesterday at 08:10 PM
Yesterday at 08:10 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Iowa
T
trapdog1 Offline
trapper
trapdog1  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Feb 2015
Iowa
Originally Posted by ~ADC~
What has 4 legs and one arm?

A pitbull coming home from the park?

Re: Pitbulls [Re: trapdog1] #8486644
Yesterday at 08:11 PM
Yesterday at 08:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Iowa
~ADC~ Offline
The Count
~ADC~  Offline
The Count

Joined: Jun 2010
Iowa
Originally Posted by trapdog1
Originally Posted by ~ADC~
What has 4 legs and one arm?

A pitbull coming home from the park?


Correct! frown smile

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486645
Yesterday at 08:12 PM
Yesterday at 08:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Virginia
5
52Carl Offline
trapper
52Carl  Offline
trapper
5

Joined: Jan 2014
Virginia
The problem with pitbulls comes from their historical lineage. They were bred to not only bite and fight, but to snap once the fight got going.
Breeders who had dogs that did not snap were 'Kristi Noemed'. They were eliminated from the gene pool. After several generations of this selection process, they all carried the 'snap' gene. No different with how retrievers and pointers were selectively bred. The ones that failed to retrieve or point were taken out of the gene pool. A cold hard fact of how things were dealt with way back when.
People aren't killed by a bite from a pitbull. They are killed by an animal which snapped and went berserk until their adversary stopped quivering.

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486646
Yesterday at 08:12 PM
Yesterday at 08:12 PM
Joined: May 2011
Oakland, MS
yotetrapper30 Offline
trapper
yotetrapper30  Offline
trapper

Joined: May 2011
Oakland, MS
I was gonna guess a pitbull coming back from the neighbor's kid's birthday party. frown


Proudly banned from the NTA.

Bother me tomorrow. Today I'll buy no sorrows.
Re: Pitbulls [Re: Savell] #8486654
Yesterday at 08:21 PM
Yesterday at 08:21 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
New Hampshire
N
Nessmuck Offline
trapper
Nessmuck  Offline
trapper
N

Joined: Nov 2011
New Hampshire
Originally Posted by Savell
Originally Posted by KeithC
I don't disagree there are pitbull horror stories. Most pitbulls and pitbull like dogs are never a problem. The facts irrefutably prove that. Just because some people had a bad experience and are now terrified of something, doesn't mean they should be allowed to force other people not to have it.

Keith


…. Them pits as bad as your Muslim buddies


Not all Muslims are terrorists....but all terrorists are Muslim

Not all pitbulls are killers....but all killers are pitbulls..


It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486656
Yesterday at 08:22 PM
Yesterday at 08:22 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell Offline
trapper
Savell  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
… I seen a colored boy in town running a pit down the side of the road chained to cinder blocks while hitting it with a stick … bet that turns out nice


Insert profound nonsense here
Re: Pitbulls [Re: trappingthomas] #8486661
Yesterday at 08:27 PM
Yesterday at 08:27 PM
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
Originally Posted by trappingthomas
seriously? Feeling like I am trying to argue with my leftist dad. Never asked me my experience. prob. because of you cute clips of a carnivore stronger than you licking a human baby! please idiot!


You obviously fail to grasp that your personal experience, though important and emotionally upsetting to you, is not statistically significant.

Keith

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486683
Yesterday at 09:01 PM
Yesterday at 09:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
G
GREENCOUNTYPETE Offline
trapper
GREENCOUNTYPETE  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
one thing I will say about Pits is , when they are at a mutt with some pit they seem a lot more calm than pure breads. it take a lot of the energy out of many of them.


America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
Re: Pitbulls [Re: KeithC] #8486686
Yesterday at 09:05 PM
Yesterday at 09:05 PM
Joined: Jul 2024
IL
NorthwesternYote Offline
trapper
NorthwesternYote  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2024
IL
Originally Posted by KeithC
You obviously fail to grasp that your personal experience, though important and emotionally upsetting to you, is not statistically significant.

Keith

It's statistically significant enough for insurance companies, despite your efforts to hand-wave it away.

How many active Trapperman posters need to come forth with their own pit bull stories before it becomes statistically significant in your sample?

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486687
Yesterday at 09:11 PM
Yesterday at 09:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Central Oregon
AntiGov Offline
trapper
AntiGov  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2014
Central Oregon
Just kill them all and be done with it


The Vink for chief moderator....night shift ...11pm- 5am best coast time zone.....Free Marty


Re: Pitbulls [Re: NorthwesternYote] #8486691
Yesterday at 09:15 PM
Yesterday at 09:15 PM
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
Originally Posted by NorthwesternYote
Originally Posted by KeithC
You obviously fail to grasp that your personal experience, though important and emotionally upsetting to you, is not statistically significant.

Keith

It's statistically significant enough for insurance companies, despite your efforts to hand-wave it away.

How many active Trapperman posters need to come forth with their own pit bull stories before it becomes statistically significant in your sample?


Please give me even a single example of a major US insurance company that won't cover pitbulls if the owners pay them too.

State Farm, USAA and Farmers don't even charge more for pitbulls.

Keith

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486695
Yesterday at 09:22 PM
Yesterday at 09:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2011
Covington, VA
D
Dewey S Offline
trapper
Dewey S  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Apr 2011
Covington, VA
I have Erie for homeowners and they will not cover you if you own a Pitbull, Doberman, Rottweiler and there was one more. Maybe a Rhodesian Ridgeback however I'm not real certain about that one. This was 10 years ago when I got the policy.

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486699
Yesterday at 09:27 PM
Yesterday at 09:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell Offline
trapper
Savell  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
…..pit bulls are African, mescin and white trash dogs

…. Hog hunters excluded but they keep them caged unless on the hunt (and there’s been issues even then )


Insert profound nonsense here
Re: Pitbulls [Re: AntiGov] #8486707
Yesterday at 09:36 PM
Yesterday at 09:36 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Iowa
~ADC~ Offline
The Count
~ADC~  Offline
The Count

Joined: Jun 2010
Iowa
Originally Posted by AntiGov
Just kill them all and be done with it


x2

Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread