No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Pitbulls [Re: Dewey S] #8486710
Yesterday at 09:46 PM
Yesterday at 09:46 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
OK
Aaron Proffitt Offline
trapper
Aaron Proffitt  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2007
OK
Originally Posted by Dewey S
I have Erie for homeowners and they will not cover you if you own a Pitbull, Doberman, Rottweiler and there was one more. Maybe a Rhodesian Ridgeback however I'm not real certain about that one. This was 10 years ago when I got the policy.


I don't think it's Ridgebacks, bud. They're pretty even tempered.


Honor a Soldier. Be the kind of American worth fighting for.
Re: Pitbulls [Re: Dewey S] #8486718
Yesterday at 09:49 PM
Yesterday at 09:49 PM
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
Originally Posted by Dewey S
I have Erie for homeowners and they will not cover you if you own a Pitbull, Doberman, Rottweiler and there was one more. Maybe a Rhodesian Ridgeback however I'm not real certain about that one. This was 10 years ago when I got the policy.


A search of Erie's complete website shows no results for "pitbull".

[Linked Image]

https://www.erieinsurance.com/search-results?searchValue=Pitbull

An online search says:

[Linked Image]

Keith

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486723
Yesterday at 09:51 PM
Yesterday at 09:51 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Iowa
~ADC~ Offline
The Count
~ADC~  Offline
The Count

Joined: Jun 2010
Iowa
No one can out google Kieth.

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486732
Yesterday at 09:57 PM
Yesterday at 09:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell Offline
trapper
Savell  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
…. Evidently AI hasn’t had friends or family mauled by that ghetto breed yet lol

[Linked Image]


Insert profound nonsense here
Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486733
Yesterday at 09:58 PM
Yesterday at 09:58 PM
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
P
Providence Farm Offline
trapper
Providence Farm  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
When it see them out and about im always in a defensive posture hand on gun. If they are on my place they dont leave.

Re: Pitbulls [Re: ~ADC~] #8486734
Yesterday at 09:58 PM
Yesterday at 09:58 PM
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
Originally Posted by ~ADC~
No one can out google Kieth.


Old Buckne, who I miss, would have given me a run for my money.

It's better to have a position you can give evidence of, than to just to make up what you say, go by what you may of heard as fact, or go by what you feel.

Keith

Re: Pitbulls [Re: Savell] #8486736
Yesterday at 09:59 PM
Yesterday at 09:59 PM
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
Originally Posted by Savell
…. Evidently AI hasn’t had friends or family mauled by that ghetto breed yet lol

[Linked Image]


LOL

I don't love pitbulls though. I have little experience with them and only know one person who has one. I just don't think any dog breed should be banned. I think once breed is banned, other breeds will quickly follow.

I absolutely do feel owners should be legally and criminally responsible for their dogs and other dangerous animals.

Keith

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486738
Yesterday at 10:05 PM
Yesterday at 10:05 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Vernal, Utah, USA
Dan Barnhurst Offline
trapper
Dan Barnhurst  Offline
trapper

Joined: Mar 2011
Vernal, Utah, USA
Ticking time bombs. Not worth the risk for a pet. I can see them being a good tool for a hog hunter if kenneled properly and managed well, but never for a pet! There are so many better dogs to choose from for pets.


United we stand.
Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486740
Yesterday at 10:08 PM
Yesterday at 10:08 PM
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
I will wholeheartedly agree there are definitely better breeds of dogs to keep as pets than pitbulls.

Keith

Re: Pitbulls [Re: KeithC] #8486749
Yesterday at 10:31 PM
Yesterday at 10:31 PM
Joined: Jul 2024
IL
NorthwesternYote Offline
trapper
NorthwesternYote  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2024
IL
Originally Posted by KeithC
Originally Posted by Dewey S
I have Erie for homeowners and they will not cover you if you own a Pitbull, Doberman, Rottweiler and there was one more. Maybe a Rhodesian Ridgeback however I'm not real certain about that one. This was 10 years ago when I got the policy.


A search of Erie's complete website shows no results for "pitbull".

[Linked Image]

https://www.erieinsurance.com/search-results?searchValue=Pitbull

An online search says:

[Linked Image]

Keith




It varies state by state as some states ban breed discrimination by law. Some of these laws are more recent developments. But in one example, Farmers was widely reported to drop coverage for pit bulls in California back in 2013:
https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/...ls-rottweilers-and-wolf-hybrids/2055604/

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486752
Yesterday at 10:36 PM
Yesterday at 10:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell Offline
trapper
Savell  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
…. Kieth in his younger days lol

[Linked Image]


Insert profound nonsense here
Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486766
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Joined: Apr 2011
Covington, VA
D
Dewey S Offline
trapper
Dewey S  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Apr 2011
Covington, VA
I know what the woman told me when i signed the papers. I should have never responded. Lesson learned.

Re: Pitbulls [Re: Savell] #8486770
Yesterday at 11:36 PM
Yesterday at 11:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
49th State
M
mad_mike Offline
trapper
mad_mike  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Jan 2008
49th State
Originally Posted by Savell
…. Kieth in his younger days lol

[Linked Image]

Seems friendly enough. lol.

Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486786
13 hours ago
13 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
Son had a female Rhodesian Ridgeback . Smart dog that loved humans. Killed any other animal it could get its jaws on. Including a lot of dogs.


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Pitbulls [Re: NorthwesternYote] #8486914
6 hours ago
6 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by NorthwesternYote
Originally Posted by KeithC
What do you think I "danced around" on. Pitbulls are not a significantly serious danger and I proved so. Use the logical part of your brain and read what I wrote again.

Keith

It's funny how the insurance companies, as charles detailed in his post, which heavily base their decision-making on statistics, have been known to decline to cover homes with pit bulls.

I was an independent insurance agent for over 50 years. I represented 16 different companies. None of them would insure anyone owning a pitbull.

I had a friend who was a State Farm agent. They insured pitbulls with a surcharge. But, he said he didn't think they would be continuing that much longer, as they had had some seriously bad dog bite claims with pitbulls.


My wife says my housekeeping style is best described as, "There appears to have been a struggle."
Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8486921
6 hours ago
6 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Years ago, we had this discussion regarding pitbulls. I remember there was a person from one of the southern states who owned several pitbulls for many years. He said as some on here have also said, that pitbulls are one of the best hog dogs there are. That's what he had them for. But, he said they are never to be trusted, especially around children.

I can give examples of many cases where a pitbull mauled or killed someone. Here's one that happened in Minneapolis couple years ago: A man who owned a pitbull had a 3 year old son. The dog had always been playful with the kid. The man stepped outside to have a smoke. He heard a ruckus in the house. He rushed in to find the dog had his 3 year old son by the throat. The poor kid was dead before the ambulance got there. The man maintained pitbulls always get a bad rap cause his experience with his was that of a gentle dog.


My wife says my housekeeping style is best described as, "There appears to have been a struggle."
Re: Pitbulls [Re: nate] #8487013
36 minutes ago
36 minutes ago
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Online content
trapper
Yes sir  Online Content
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
I got a nice insurance check because of a pit bull once. Insurance company told me they didnt know they had a pit or they wouldn't have covered them. I made sure the problem wouldn't happen again and the sheriff deputy told me thank you. He said they are nothing but a problem for him.
Keith i cant own a pet skunk without jumping through a bunch of paper work to get a special license, dont tell me outlawing pits is a slippery slope to losing our 2nd amendment. It wouldn't be any different than me not being able to own a tiger.

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread